Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OBAMA at WebHall - Legalize marijuana ----> NO!!! nt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Traveling_Home Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 11:15 AM
Original message
OBAMA at WebHall - Legalize marijuana ----> NO!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. I disagree with him on this but recognize that it is a political problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. It's been a "political problem" for too long
It's time for this country to grow the fuck up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuckessee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. It's not a political thing.
It's a puppet master thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Decriminalize possession of small amounts of marijuana ----> YES?!? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
empyreanisles Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. He said legalizing Marijauna would not help the economy.
Not that legalizing Marijuana was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. That's a ludicrous statement
Edited on Thu Mar-26-09 11:32 AM by shadowknows69
Taxed and made into an industry? The money and new small businesses would be like a flood. You'd see a WeedMart store chain owned by the Walton family within a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
empyreanisles Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Honestly? I agree with you, but it is a politically toxic idea.
And we need Obama for 2 terms. Right now, I'm fine with simply reducing prosecutions of Marijuana-related issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. And it would have stirred up controversy that would have pushed the
rest of his agenda to the side. Let's work at the state level, that is where the change can be made. Remember, Holder said he wouldn't step in if it wasn't against state laws. So change it at the state level, and the feds will have to follow suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. The question was in reference to legalization saving the economy
I agree. Legalization alone, will not save the economy.

The question wasn't whether or not he was in favor of legalization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnutbutr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. it would help
by creating new farms, jobs, related businesses, shipping of product, manufacturing, processing etc... It would create an entirely new industry and businesses related to it.

There is some other reason he is opposing it that he is not telling us because unless he's a complete moron he would see that it will create jobs and in turn improve the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I am for decriminalization
Edited on Thu Mar-26-09 11:27 AM by blogslut
But not for the purposes of mass production. I would rather it be legal to grow enough for a personal supply. As for hemp production, that I can get behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnutbutr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. I was lumping the two together nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No.23 Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. This position distances President Obama from FDR, unfortunately.
Who ended Prohibition.

Too bad; so sad.

He (the Prez) needs to be more like FDR, not less like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. You cant compare alcohol and weed
In terms of the what society thinks of the two, they are miles apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No.23 Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Unfair comparison.
Edited on Thu Mar-26-09 11:32 AM by No.23
You have to compare what the public felt about alcohol then... with what the public feels about Mary Jane now... for a fairer assessment.

Not what the public feels about both now.

They both are victims of unwarranted moralization... in their own respective time frames.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Prohibition was extremely unpopular in the 20s and early 30s
Marijuana is much more evenly split. A recent poll showed 40% were for legalization, while 46% were against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No.23 Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Does this suggest that...
Edited on Thu Mar-26-09 11:47 AM by No.23
the prohibition against Mary Jane (I know I'm showing my age here :)) has to become a lot more unpopular before it is repealed?

Sad if this is so.

A true leader doesn't wait for that to be the case, to do the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FudaFuda Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. They passed a Constitutional amendment
36 states ratified it before there was a vote in the Senate ... and we only had 48 states then. It wasn't that unpopular with the population as a whole. Public opinion changed in response to the violence that resulted from gang warfare.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. And this is a surprise somehow?
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bennyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
15. At least the conversation is changing....
People are asking leaders about it now too.....

There is no way he could support MJ legalization. Perhaps in a year or two.

There has been a SEA CHANGE on this issue since the Phelps situation. People are realizing what stoners already know, Marijuana is smoked by everyone and has NO detrimental effects.

But the problem is with how it could be taxed. I think everyone that smokes it will grow it. I also think the industry would take on a wine growing type feel. Certain areas would be know for certain type ofsbud.

So how do you tax that? And in that case, the price will go down dramatically.

The real savings will be at the courts, jail, probtion complex. That is where the money goes now. Lawyers, guns and Money.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. so why not hemp??
:shrug: why doesn't anyone ask him about hemp? it's NOT marijuana!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Hemp hype
I'm all for legalization, and I do understand that hemp has some great properties as a fiber crop. However, it isn't that compelling an economic argument. Yes, you can make cloth out of it, but I'm not aware of a clothing shortage. It makes fine rope, but again, is there a rope shortage?

Basically, hemp could replace some fiber crops and possibly some vegetable oil producing crops and maybe even allow us to cut back on some plastics, but these are all pretty incremental and not all of the replacements are much worse than hemp. It just isn't compelling.

Keeping it illegal isn't compelling either, but I just don't buy the economic savior argument for hemp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. it's not hype
besides the examples you mentioned, it's also used in food products. ever had hemp ice cream? yuuuuummy!


it grows, well, like a weed, organically, etc. saves trees. i can go on and on. fact is, like cannabis, too much money is invested in alternatives to hemp for them to allow it to be legal here, too many industries against it.

besides..oh no!...it actually looks like cannabis! can't have that, can we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. That's the hype!
Exactly how is our economy going to improve because hemp is used in ice cream? Even the "replaces trees" although it has some merits, is hyped...believe it or not, trees grow organically and well, like weeds too...AND I still see no case for the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coffee and Cake Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. I think it would be better to clog up our judicial system and jails
Edited on Thu Mar-26-09 02:12 PM by Coffee and Cake
instead of legalizing a non-criminal act, such as smoking pot. This could be a good way to stimulate the economy. We can hire more police officers, border patrol agents, lawyers, judges, correction officers, parole officers, DEA agents, and construction workers to build bigger jails.

/sarcasm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
24. I didn't expect him to say anything different. I can't believe anybody is surprised
I don't think anybody who had a realistic chance of being president was going to come out for legailizing any drugs even pot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. yeah, it would torpedo everything else, like Clinton and gays in the military
Very sad and very stupid, but "Gob 'less 'muricah"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC