Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US accuses Pakistan intelligence branch of aiding Al Qaeda - Holbrooke refuses to rule out strikes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 11:16 AM
Original message
US accuses Pakistan intelligence branch of aiding Al Qaeda - Holbrooke refuses to rule out strikes
WASHINGTON (AFP) — The United States has vowed to put the heat on Pakistan's spies in its new regional strategy, with top officials openly accusing elements in powerful intelligence agency of abetting Al-Qaeda.

Richard Holbrooke, the US special envoy to the region, said he would visit Pakistan again next week to follow up on the plan. Of all issues, investigating the nuclear-armed nation's spy network "is the most important," he said.

"The issue's very disturbing," Holbrooke said on public television when asked if Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) was assisting Al-Qaeda and Taliban extremists.

"We cannot succeed if the two intelligence agencies are at each others' throat or don't trust each other and if the kind of collusion you referred to is factual," Holbrooke said.

General David Petraeus, the commander of US forces in Afghanistan and Iraq, did not dispute that ISI elements have tipped off extremists to let them escape US-led forces.

"There are some cases that are indisputable in which that appears to have taken place," Petraeus said.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jBs_MR2HFabpaowjNKkGDWHomWvw


U.S. cagey on possible Pakistan strikes

March 28 (UPI) -- Obama administration officials are being cagey about whether U.S. forces should directly engage terrorists operating in northwestern Pakistan, analysts said.

Richard Holbrooke, U.S. special envoy to Pakistan and Afghanistan, declined Friday to say whether the United States would fight inside Pakistan to target Osama bin Laden and other terrorist leaders known to be based there, the Washington publication The Hill reported.

It would be "deeply injurious to our national interest to speculate" on that, Holbrooke said.

His comments came an hour after U.S. President Barack Obama told reporters that the United States was reserving the option of attacking terrorists within Pakistan, saying, "We will insist that action be taken -- one way or another -- when we have intelligence about high-level terrorist targets."

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/03/28/US_cagey_on_possible_Pakistan_strikes/UPI-98411238248726/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't trust Holbrooke or Petraeus aka, "I have a bad feeling about this".
Edited on Sat Mar-28-09 11:29 AM by EFerrari
Holbrooke is too close to the neocons and Petreaus lied his ass off for Bush before Congress. Can anyone explain to me how they can be trusted to deal with Pakistan? I sincerely don't get it.

/oops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. this looks like escalation to me
Maybe the rhetoric will be dialed back when the discussion reaches the Oval Office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And I wasn't thinking about escalation but of the actors themselves.
It looks like escalation to me, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC