|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Karmadillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-28-09 12:26 PM Original message |
How the Obama/Geithner Scam Works |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quiet.american (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-28-09 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well, Mr. Hudson, exactly what is *your* idea to fix this mess? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jakeXT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-28-09 01:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I think he is in the write off the fictitious debts, because they can't be paid camp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quiet.american (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-28-09 01:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Thanks for the link -- here's the thing.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-28-09 09:13 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Ridiculous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 02:39 AM Response to Reply #5 |
16. Ding Ding DIng. We have a winner. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
datasuspect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 08:21 AM Response to Reply #5 |
25. this administration is in the pocket of wall street |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomClash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 09:58 AM Response to Reply #5 |
27. You're actually citing Greenspan and Lindsay Graham? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-28-09 10:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Oh, the alternative is viable. It's been done before. And some Republicans already suggested it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meuniermr (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 12:45 AM Response to Reply #2 |
10. Exactly, write off the derivatives bubble. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doremus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 10:51 AM Response to Reply #10 |
32. Are we really prepared to live with the consequences? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 12:20 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. The prospects.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-28-09 10:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Your comment indicates a) you didn't read a thing and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-28-09 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
4. I'm extremely angry about their plan. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-28-09 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
6. i don't think you're explaining it correctly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-28-09 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
7. k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Tiger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 01:28 AM Response to Original message |
11. It's amazing how suddenly all these "economists" have come crawling out of the woodwork |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kitty Herder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 02:12 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I've been reading Hudson on Counterpunch since 2003, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Tiger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 02:27 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. So I assume since he's such an expert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kitty Herder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 03:10 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Many economists predicted it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 11:59 AM Response to Reply #14 |
36. ...also, I'm pretty sure Counterpunch is not allowed to be linked to here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yes We Did (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 04:02 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. 5 years ago... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
natrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 05:56 AM Response to Reply #11 |
20. my god even an 8 year old could see this for what it is-complete fraud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aggiesal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
12. When JPM Chase purchased WaMu, it was at the urging of ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 01:48 AM Response to Original message |
13. This is what I call "going too far." I don't believe Obama is trying to scam anyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 08:03 AM Response to Reply #13 |
22. Thank you for your voice of reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pam4water (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 03:52 AM Response to Original message |
18. Why does the Obama administration keep putting off cleaning out the septic tank? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomm2thumbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
21. This sounds like a mess in the making - egad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orwellian_Ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 08:09 AM Response to Original message |
23. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jester Messiah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 08:11 AM Response to Original message |
24. This article smells fishy to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 10:03 AM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Deleted message |
Jester Messiah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 10:27 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. I was trying to keep my tone civil... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karmadillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 10:46 AM Response to Reply #24 |
31. Don't know if this helps, but Jeffrey Sachs seems to agree with Hudson. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 11:43 AM Response to Reply #31 |
35. So the suposition is that the hedges would make incredibly bad bets on purpose? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karmadillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 01:13 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. No, if Hudson and Sachs are correct, they would be overbidding themselves into being winners. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 12:02 PM Response to Reply #24 |
37. Welcome to Counterpunch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 08:25 AM Response to Original message |
26. I think you meant this post for the pubic blog. You accidentally posted it to a Dem. forum. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TWiley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
28. So Einstien, you fix a broken leg by dressing the finger? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlingBlade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
33. You MUST have that Petition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlbertCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
34. in order to let the banks pull off the following scam. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-29-09 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
39. The valuation in that scenario assumes an 80% default rate, doesn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 03:49 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC