Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Texans forge compromise on evolution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 08:57 PM
Original message
Texans forge compromise on evolution
Theory’s backers voice dismay over school board’s ‘convoluted’ standards

By April Castro
updated 6:14 p.m. MT, Fri., March. 27, 2009

AUSTIN, Texas - State education leaders forged a compromise Friday on the teaching of evolution in Texas, adopting a new science curriculum that no longer requires educators to teach the weaknesses of all scientific theories.

The State Board of Education voted 13-2 to put in place a plan that would instead require teachers to encourage students to scrutinize “all sides” of scientific theories, a move criticized by evolution proponents.

Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills, which will be in place for the next decade, governs what teachers are required to cover in the classroom, the topics students are tested on and the material published in textbooks.

The backers of evolutionary theory, who wanted the State Board of Education to drop the 20-year-old requirement that both “strengths and weaknesses” of scientific theories be taught, said the new plan uses confusing language that allows creationist arguments to slip into Texas classrooms.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29902944/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. The magic man in the sky did it is not science
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. bingo
that, to me is the main point.

iow, the point is NOT "are the creationists right?"

the point is that you can't teach CREATIONISM, as science, or as an alternative to science.

cause it's not science.

period.

i am all for teachers expounding on the fallibility of science.

science has been wrong about plenty of stuff, and still is.

but it has a method, it has accountability, it has a rigorous process, etc.

that's why we use it, and not fillintheblankswithgod(tm) in science classes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. An informed voice on the "compromise"....
Edited on Sat Mar-28-09 09:06 PM by BlooInBloo
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/03/texas_confuses_me.php


EDIT: Fuck it. If people are gonna fight that hard to be stupid, let them be, and forever remain, so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC