Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Over marijuana. Lethal force? Are you fvcking kidding me?!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 09:09 AM
Original message
Over marijuana. Lethal force? Are you fvcking kidding me?!
Edited on Sun Mar-29-09 09:29 AM by kpete
Police shoot unarmed student over marijuana, campuses erupt
by Cenobyte
Sun Mar 29, 2009 at 06:42:28 AM PDT

Seriously, this insanity has to stop.

I can't even use marijuana -- it just knocks me out -- so I hope that that disclosure heads off any assumption that I'm in this to get high.

But in Michigan, a college student was shot in the chest by police during a search of his off-campus apartment for marijuana. According to reports, he opened the door, and was shot by a deputy in the chest.

Over marijuana. Lethal force? Are you fvcking kidding me?!

From The Holland Sentinal:

He returns to class following punctured lung, fractured ribs, damaged liver

Copp was unarmed when a deputy shot him in the chest at his off-campus apartment more than two weeks ago. West Michigan Enforcement Team officers entered the residence on a search warrant.

That deputy remains on paid leave while the Michigan State Police investigate the shooting.

The shooting spurred several student protests ...

Copp’s attorney has said “a few tablespoonfuls” of marijuana were found in the apartment.


http://www.hollandsentinel.com/news/x1984813816/GVSU-student-shot-in-drug-raid-calls-for-patience-in-investigation


more at:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/3/29/714283/-Police-shoot-unarmed-student-over-marijuana,-campuses-erupt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Summermoondancer Donating Member (315 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. They shoot old 92 year old ladies over it too
Do you recall the situation in Atlanta where they shot an elderly lady? They broke down her door with a no knock warrant trying to accuse her of drug dealing...it was a warrant they lied to get in the first place...they based it on burgler bars...who would be stupid enough to NOT have burgler bars in the West End of Atlanta, Georgia? It is the Hood extra heavy...! Well they broke down the door, didn´t identify themselves as cops and were in plain clothing...stupid...she shot at them and they killed her...well she wasn´t a drug dealer, she didn´t have drugs, they planted them...then they tried to threaten someone that saw the whole thing...it all came to light and they were suspended and the entire narcotics force had to be replaced. Nice job!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Can't believe some of the nutty comments at the Holland Sentinel website.
Cogent thought and literacy apparently are not valued by some of those folks. Hope none of their kids are found by cops to be in the presence of two or three spoonsful of weed.

i stand on the sideof the sheriffs dept. and our drug team. they were doing their jobs. copp was had something he knew was illegal to have. it dont matter how much or little he had. it was still illegal. and the drug policys. their is nothing wrong with them.if it were not for the dea. and other drug agencys. the big drug cartels would run the world. and we would not have the freedoms we have now.drug users are just a small part of a much bigger picture. the drug has to come from some where,read up on the cartels and their violence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. What a kool aid quote from the freeper.
"the big drug cartels would run the world."

Right...."would run", huh?


"and we would not have the freedoms we have now"

I will bet dollars to doughnuts that writer could not even list the "freedoms" in the Constitution versus the
"freedoms" we have lost, or even state what "freedoms" we have now.
Gotta protect those "freedoms"...which apparently no longer cover being shot by the police for no reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Big Drug cartels already rule the world - Phizer, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline
typical Freeper - can't ever see what's in front of their face, but always willing to misspell their radio broadcast talking points in any and every forum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Commonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
19. Yeah, like what about the freedom...
...to enjoy a bonghit in the privacy of my own home?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. ... or even just the freedom not to be gunned down in your own home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. looks like that poster was stoned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Probably gettin' ready to call the cops and report himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuxvomica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
37. Maybe not. Some folks smoke pot to get "stupid"
While other folks don't need any assistance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. Holland is a Hardcore winger area which is about ten miles from my house
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
63. Isn't Holland where Hope College is?
College towns are usually better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. ooo I live in west michigan and it doesnt surprise me
lots of people like that here. creepy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
30. That fucker is lucky the cops aren't allowed to shoot someone based on
how ignorant they are. He would have been worm food long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammythecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. (sigh)
The sad thing is, there are millions and millions of voters in this country just as brilliant as this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
41. That poster's grammar and spelling are equal to his logic
and intelligence. I stopped counting at 12 errors in spelling and grammar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. From your OP, I wouldn't have known that the student is still alive, if I hadn't clicked on
Edited on Sun Mar-29-09 09:25 AM by scarletwoman
the first link. I got really upset as I was reading your post, thinking how horrible, what a waste of a life, hope his parents sue the shit out of that police department -- until the Holland Sentinel page finally loaded (I'm on dialup) and I saw the actual headline.

Yes, it still sucks that he was shot, but I think it's a bit of a disservice that your OP doesn't make it clear that he survived the shooting.

I love you dearly, kpete, and appreciate all that you do for DU and all hundreds and hundreds of incredibly important pieces of information you tirelessly gather week after week -- so I hope you'll not take this small criticism personally.

Best wishes,
sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I do not mind at all...
you are right and I thank you.
I updated post to include:
"He returns to class following punctured lung, fractured ribs, damaged liver"


peace, kp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Thank you.
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
43. Well they shot a 68 year old man, and he died
in Oregon at the begining of March. Arrested an 80 year old woman for growing plants, shot the man dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. I didn't know that we measure pot by cooking utensils now.
I can just hear someone asking to buy one half cup of the stuff. Too funny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. Fucking domestic terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wow. They thought he had pot so they shot him in the chest.
Seriously. They shot him over a mistake. Either the cop was incompetent or the cop believed the guy had a weapon.

We should get rid of all cops. When somebody calls 911 they can get a drug dealer instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
61. I think that is a grand idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. Of course the insanity has to stop
The majority of people of this country want it to stop, other countries want it to stop, but the power elite certainly don't want it to stop. After all, the War on Drugs brings the cash rolling in for the select few, police departments, certain segments of the legal community, various government agencies, etc. etc. Despite his being initially in favor of decriminalizing pot, apparently this power elite has gotten to our new president, who now says, "The answer is 'no," Obama said flatly, "I dont think that is a good strategy to grow our economy."

Thus this failed war is going to roll on as more people get killed and all our civil rights disappear.

What's even more troubling is that the Obama administration is even backpedaling on their pledge of no more medical marijuana raids. <http://cbs5.com/local/medical.marijuana.raid.2.968019.html> So much for that "change we can believe in" at least when it comes to marijuana policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. Why are you ignoring Senator Webb's plan?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=8298114&mesg_id=8298114

And no the admin is not backpedaling on their pledge, the DEA is claiming the dispensary broke federal and state law. That claim is being litigated now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. I would love to see Webb's plan come to fruition,
The trouble is, given Obama's recent statements, I doubt that the bill would get much traction in Congress without the president pushing it, not to mention Obama signing it into law.

As far as Obama breaking his pledge, yes, he did. He promised in the campaign that if he were to be president he would “not use Justice Department resources to try and circumvent state laws” in regards to medical marijuana. <“not use Justice Department resources to try and circumvent state laws” [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTWZ7W5w48s> Yet that's what the DEA just did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. The bill already has traction AND bipartisan support.
It's going to happen, period. This year.

And you're still wrong about the Obama/Holder pledge, but it looks like there no convincing you. If the DEA was in the wrong (and I'm guessing might be), they'll be dealt with. But for now, all we know is that the dispensary was allegedly not paying some taxes and that's a crime regardless of what Obama and Holder said. Let's see where this goes before condemning the President who had exactly nothing to do with the recent raid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Will Obama sign it?
Somehow I doubt it, but we'll see.

As far as the dispensary raid, if the problem was with taxes, then why send in the DEA and not the IRS? Sorry, but this looks like another case of unleashing the DEA to subvert state laws and the will of the people. Oh, and since the DEA is part of the executive branch of government, Obama does indeed have everything to do with this raid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. I don't know why they sent the DEA instead of the IRS
That's what they're trying to determine as we type.

But I know that Obama didn't send them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. So Obama isn't in charge of the Justice Dept. and by extension the DEA?
I'm sure that if Obama had actually put his foot down on the matter, the DEA wouldn't have been involved in this. Instead we see that Obama was simply paying lip service to the notion of restraining the DEA, while the reality seems to be that there is no change and the DEA is still free to raid as it pleases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Obama did put his foot down, and it's still down
You're still ignoring that fact.

Do you really believe that Obama called the DEA and told them to raid the dispensary? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Apparently not, being the President, if he had wanted the DEA to stop these raids,
They would have stopped. One call to the DEA and there would be no more raids. Yet Obama didn't make that call, and instead of the IRS going in on a tax matter, the DEA went in and raided the place.

Understand this, please. Obama has control over the DEA. What he says concerning their actions is law. And while he publicly promised that there would be no more DEA raids, apparently he "forgot" to pass that memo on to the DEA. Thus, he broke his promise. The only other alternative is that we have a rogue DEA, which would be a much more serious problem. So which is it? A rogue DEA or a broken promise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. Do you really think they go to him for approval of every action?
I'm sorry that you're angry. I think you're mistaken in your assumption that this particular raid was approved by Pres. Obama himself rather than other people interpreting his policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. If Obama ordered the DEA to stop the raids, they would stop.
It's just like NAFTA: "Sometimes during campaigns the rhetoric gets overheated and amplified."

In other words, his words are frequently just talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. So do you fault him for not ordering a stop to raids (that haven't happened since
this one instance in SF)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. Yes. Especially since he claimed to have ordered a stop to them weeks ago.
More "amplified rhetoric", I'm sure. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #49
54. Good. Glad we're at the bottom of it. IMO the only amplified rhetoric is here online. n/t
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 12:02 PM by crikkett
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. Right. It sounds like you support DEA raids on Medical Marijuana facilities. I oppose them.
President Obama has claimed to oppose them, but has allowed them to continue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. "Obama ...has allowed them to continue" is your contention. I say, the single solitary drug raid
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 04:50 PM by crikkett
that occurred in SF since the Atty General announced a halt to Raiding Drug Clinics that are Operating Lawfully was
a) against a clinic allegedly in violation of tax law
b) the result of an underling's interpretation of Obama's policy against raiding drug clinics
c) not Obama's direct decision in itself.


What I say is a LOT less hyperbolic than what you say.

I do not say that I support raids on drug clinics.

To the contrary, I support calm reasoning and critical thinking, instead of leaping off a cliff like so many hysterical lemmings at the slightest provocation, Cursing Obama the entire way down, the way you and half of DU has.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #24
45. When a business fails to pay taxes
is it common for the DEA to raid them? Is that how taxation issues are usually dealt with, by armed agents raiding the business?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. DEA goes in whenever drugs are involved, legal or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. Background would be helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
14. It's a reason for no-knock raids in the middle of the night
You know, cause big time drug dealers are just seconds away from being able to dump their entire stash down the toilet without a trace, so this violent and dangerous entry into a suspects homes is required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Big timers couldn't flush their weed down the toilet.
In Tucson big dealers have bedrooms packed floor to ceiling with weed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Butch350 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
60. How do you know this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
18. Better dead than head?
That's insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCappedBandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
20. And he gets paid vacation. Fuck these lunatics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
22. But if you steal 50 billion dollars you get to stay in your 8.4 ...
million dollar apartment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #22
42. Bingo. Fucking George Soros says he's doing

very well out of this economic crises, making billions, and it's the culmination of his life's work. Don't anybody tell me this guy's a liberal again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
26. 8.5 Miles from my house sits Grand Valley. The college student is out of the hospital and the irony
of the whole story to me was his last name is Copp. The Students protested and the Dean actually supported the student and not the officer which was nice to see. I haven't seen anymore about the story on our local news but of course the cop who shot the student is not cooperating. Legalize it, Tax it and use the police for real crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
35. People are happy he got shot on the posting board, wtf?
Shooting an unarmed man, even if he was a drug addict (on a drug that doesn't cause violence), is unjustifiable. I wonder if the police officer just got trigger happy and fired when he shouldn't have. I'm interested in updates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
36. This article is shit....
... he opened the door and was shot. Willing to bet there is something else going on here. Christ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #36
51. All the info that was disclosed, is in the article. There's an ongoing investigation.
What's your beef?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. My beef is...
... that all the info that was disclosed consisted of "The student was shot." It doesn't say why, if the officer was threatened, if the student had a weapon, what the warrant was for etc.. etc.. etc.. Shoddy "journalism"

The post and especially the KOS post try to insinuate that the cop said something along the lines of "Gosh, this defenseless boy has a few ounces of pot, I think I'll shoot him when he opens the door." It is misleading and frankly insulting.

Everyone jumps on the "Fucking Pigs" bandwagon with zero information and it shows an intellectual laziness that is pervasive around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
38. Mary Jane makes the government nervous, they don't like the fact
that THC won't lead to violence like booze or coke. It really pisses em off when people want to do a peaceful drug. Since they don't understand peace, they shoot to kill and lie about the effects of THC.

Weed is the most politicized drug in America and the most hated by people who are boring and hate watching people feel good without wanting to smash a chair over someone elses head in a bar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #38
50. Pretty much. There's a real ideological drive fueling the 'war' on pot
That the fascists get to make so much $ on harmless "criminals" is the icing on their cake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
40. A few tablesponfuls! Why he was obviously a HUGE dealer!!
Lock em all up!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
48. Something tells me the cops have a higher chance of getting nailed than in other cases like that
Can you tell why?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
53. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
57. LEGALIZE THIS ALREADY
Obviously there are more harms in getting caught with weed as opposed to actually doin it. So sad, why guns drawn? I actually was a victim of an unreasonable search of my house I was renting while in college, 6 armed undercover officers barged in my house without a warrant, accusing us of selling cocaine. Tried it once when I was 22, never have never will sell it. Marijuana is a peaceful drug, you might need firepower when dealing with a drunk but never a pot head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
58. It is a war after all. What do you expect?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
59. Police. Side effects may include being shot, tasered, pepper-sprayed, run over...

Of course, the side effects are categorically your own fault. The police are angels who patrol the streets, tracking down the boogey men, boogey women, and boogey children who mean to do you harm...

Funny thing, in all my time driving a taxi in East and West Oakland, I lost more time hassle and real property to the Police than I did to all the pimps, prostitutes, thugs, playuhs, thugs, gangstas and hustlers... combined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
62. Grand Valley State has been harrassed by Dutch Christian Reformed Church and its cops for DECADES
This is just the latest salvo of police harassment and worse at the direction of Holland county and its church cronies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC