Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What happened to SOX? (Sarbanes Oxley)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 10:11 PM
Original message
What happened to SOX? (Sarbanes Oxley)
Read here specifically Sections 302 and 404. And Section 1107 Criminal penalties
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarbanes-Oxley_Act#Sarbanes-Oxley_Section_302:_Internal_control_certifications

Sarbanes-Oxley Section 1107: Criminal penalties for retaliation against whistleblowers

Section 1107 of the SOX 18 U.S.C. § 1513(e) states:<32>
“ Whoever knowingly, with the intent to retaliate, takes any action harmful to any person, including interference with the lawful employment or livelihood of any person, for providing to a law enforcement officer any truthful information relating to the commission or possible commission of any federal offense, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.


---

Yeah I know it is wikipedia but that is a very accurate summary.

SO what happened to SOX? Cassano and the rest of the crew at AIG (including the highpaid executives) clearly knew that what they were holding and buying was of no value at some point. Did they sign off on SOX for a monthly or quarterly report? I knew several people in the accounting world who deal with this indirectly every month. Suddenly everyone had to stay late for month end closing after SOX passed, why? because the executives now had to be SURE that they were signing reports that were accurate. How do you make informed decisions if you DON'T know if the balance sheet is accurate but that is a question aside from the original.

WHAT HAPPENED TO SOX?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Honestly, SOX created more problems than it solved.
I was involved in many SOX-compliant programs. Although it was very ambitious and many of the requirements SHOULD have been considered nothing more than responsible business practices, it wasn't very practical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marketcrazy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. it only applies to small business
apparently!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC