Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cafferty Argues to Legalize Pot - Cafferty?!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Danascot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 05:57 PM
Original message
Cafferty Argues to Legalize Pot - Cafferty?!
Edited on Tue Mar-31-09 06:29 PM by Danascot
War on drugs is insane

Here's something to think about:

How many police officers and sheriff's deputies are involved in investigating and solving crimes involving illegal drugs? And arresting and transporting and interrogating and jailing the suspects?

How many prosecutors and their staffs spend time prosecuting drug cases? How many defense lawyers spend their time defending drug suspects?

How many hours of courtroom time are devoted to drug trials? How many judges, bailiffs, courtroom security officers, stenographers, etc., spend their time on drug trials?

How many prison cells are filled with drug offenders? And how many corrections officers does it take to guard them? How much food do these convicts consume?

And when they get out, how many parole and probation officers does it take to supervise their release? And how many ex-offenders turn right around and do it again?

So how's this war on drugs going?

<snip>

What do you suppose the total price tag is for this failed war on drugs? One senior Harvard economist estimates we spend $44 billion a year fighting the war on drugs. He says if they were legal, governments would realize about $33 billion a year in tax revenue. Net swing of $77 billion. Could we use that money today for something else? You bet your ass we could. Plus the cartels would be out of business. Instantly. Goodbye crime and violence.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/31/cafferty.legal.drugs/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cafferty obviously needs to get stoned to deal with Blitzer. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cafferty is the best thing CNN's got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icnorth Donating Member (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. With one or two exceptions
Cafferty is about the only thing CNN's got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. good for him ....
personally, i'd love to see it legalized. Not because i use it, never have. But my inner horticulturist loves that plant! It's beautiful, complex, and mysterious. :D

But Cafferty is so right. If they're going after pot so aggressively, they should be pursuing alcohol with equal tenacity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. I love him more every day....
heh,....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Makes a lot of sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thank you Cafferty! I like him because I think he makes Wolfie a
bit nervous from time to time. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm not a fan of the guy, but it's certainly refreshing
that a very vocal representative of the curmudgeon demographic is acknowledging what a trainwreck our drug policy is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. In a round & about way, even Pat Buchanan!
I was floored when I read this in my local newspaper a few weeks ago.

I had to Google to find his column:
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=30966

- snip -
When Richard Nixon declared the War on Drugs in 1972, Milton, writing in Newsweek, objected on ethical grounds:

"On ethical grounds, do we have the right to use the machinery of government to prevent an individual from becoming an alcoholic or a drug addict? For children, almost everyone would answer at least a qualified yes. But for responsible adults, I, for one, would answer no. Reason with the potential addict, yes. Tell him the consequences, yes. Pray for and with him, yes. But I believe that we have no right to use force, directly or indirectly, to prevent a fellow man from committing suicide, let alone from drinking alcohol or taking drugs."

"Am I my brother's keeper?'" asked Milton, answering, "No."

Americans are never going to adopt the Maoist solution. For the users of drugs are all too often classmates, colleagues, friends, even family. Indeed, our last three presidents did not deny using drugs.

Once, a Christian America outlawed and punished homosexuality, abortion, alcohol, loan-sharking and gambling, all as criminal vice. Now, homosexuality and abortion are constitutional rights. Gambling and booze are a rich source of government revenue. And loan-sharking is done by credit-card companies, and not just the Corleones.

Will we raise the white flag in the drug war, as well?

Which is the greater evil? Legalized narcotics for America's young or a failed state of 110,000 million on our southern border?
- snip -



Like prohibition, the War on Drugs has spurned way too much violence, greedy seizure-control cops, an over-populated prison industry, and goodness knows what else. There certainly would be less victims - whether at the hands of dealers or the justice system.

Imagine how better off our country would be if the 5+ tons seized in Arizona this week had been regulated, taxed and sold to adult consumers.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't think a reasonable person can really argue in favor of marijuana prohibition.
At least I haven't heard the argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. woa ..Cool .. makes sense
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC