Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Life in Mendota, Calif., where the jobless rate is 41 percent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:23 PM
Original message
Life in Mendota, Calif., where the jobless rate is 41 percent
Life in Mendota, Calif., where the jobless rate is 41 percent

By Chris Collins | Fresno Bee


MENDOTA, Calif. — The customer seemed interested in a black blouse offered for $1 at the thrift store. But instead of buying it, she set it on the front counter.

Maybe tomorrow, she told the cashier, she would have the money. Or the next day. But not now.

"That is the way people are now," said the cashier, Alicia Reyes, as she watched the middle-aged woman walk out of the store. "They just come in here and look. They just come in here to kill the time. And then they take off."

Welcome to life in Mendota — the unemployment capital of California. With a 41 percent jobless rate, the town's social fabric is tearing at the seams. Alcoholism and crime are on the rise. To save money, some mothers wash and re-use disposable diapers. Unemployed men with nothing to do wander the streets and sit on benches.

The irony is obvious: In a large swath of the nation's most productive farming region, many struggle to fill their own cupboards.

During this third year of drought, farmers on the west side are fallowing hundreds of thousands of acres and hiring fewer than half the workers they did two years ago. They blame the dry weather and federal environmental laws — meant to protect endangered species of fish — that have severely restricted how much water can flow into the west side.

more...

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/226/story/65076.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. " the nation's most productive farming region, many struggle to fill their own cupboards"
says it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Productive because of irrigation
and the water is running out. That's what really says it all, but the locals won't accept. Same as here, every time we have a government economic crunch, they want to cut more trees to pay for it. I don't understand why they can't see that there aren't any more trees, all that's left are some replants that aren't even 15 years old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. To a large extent the farmers brought this on themselves
and the local economy is going down the crapper because of it.

A century of wasteful irrigation practices based on the availability of cheap (to the user) taxpayer funded water has prevented them from being able to deal with the inevitable droughts we face in this part of the world.

We are a feudal society in this valley. A few very wealthy, a large group of very poor and no middle class to speak of.

I've dealt with these farmers for almost 50 years. I delivered propane to some of them when I was a teenager. They really think they are rugged individualists when in fact they are the biggest welfare queens around. They've been getting federal bailouts in the form of cheap water, crop subsidies and in lieu payments for years. And bitched about the government the whole time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Bingo. What you said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. those unemployed aren't the "farmers"
most of them are just workers in the fields or work ancillary to farming.

the "farmers" that you say brought it on themselves are likely not the ones suffering since nearly all Central Valley ag land is owned by a handful of large landowners who never feel any pain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. That's exactly my point
When the times are good the farmers make a bundle and everybody else does more or less OK.

When the shit hits the fan, the farmer may cut back on his acreage and lose half his income. But the farm workers lose ALL theirs.

That's the way it is here in the Appalachia of California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. So, what is not being planted/grown now, and when will we notice is it gone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Yup -- the agri-combines pissed away that water, with open ditch irrigation
...and every other wasteful practice the taxpayers would subsidize (without ever really knowing it).

Then they turn around and blame the "eco hippies" when the inevitable end of productive soil (also leeched out and salted, due to those same irrigation practices) and "infinite water" comes 'round...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. That's a pessimistic read of the situation
How about calling it 59% employment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Does that make it better? With nearly 1/2 your people out of work? n/t
Edited on Tue Mar-31-09 06:49 PM by TBF
Please tell me you just forgot the sarcasm thingy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Are you serious? That makes it better? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. With a user name like "goes to 11" I'm hoping it's just sarcasm. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I hope you just forgot to add the sarcasm emoticon.....
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Of course sarcasm.
41% unemployment is unimaginable to me. Very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. Say NO to Shasta enlargement!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. 41%?!
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
17. Meth... n/t users/cookers/sellers
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. "at least three families that were so short on cash that they were rewashing disposable diapers"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC