Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Obama's Car Czar Plotting to Crush the Auto Unions?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:27 AM
Original message
Is Obama's Car Czar Plotting to Crush the Auto Unions?
Is Obama's Car Czar Plotting to Crush the Auto Unions?

By David Sirota, Blog for Our Future. Posted March 1, 2009.

Obama put corporate raider Steve Rattner in charge of overseeing the auto industry and his "plan" seems to be to crush the autoworkers.


Remember Gordon Gekko from the movie Wall Street? Specifically, remember how Gekko's entire scheme for the airline industry was based on crushing the blue-collar union that Bud Fox's dad (Martin Sheen) was part of? Welcome to a real life version of that story, starring corporate raider Steve Rattner, who President Obama appointed to head the White House team now overseeing the auto industry (and don't say you weren't warned).

As the Wall Street Journal reports, Rattner's strategy is to use the government's leverage to try to specifically crush auto workers and force them to accept even more contract concessions than they've already agreed to:

DETROIT -- President Barack Obama's recovery plan for General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC appears to take aim at union retirees, a usually reliable Democratic constituency. After studying the plight of the companies, the president's auto task force concluded GM and Chrysler's survival is dependent on greater concessions from the United Auto Workers union.

The White House has total leverage over the situation because the UAW knows that if the industry doesn't get the loans it needs, it will be forced into bankruptcy court, where judges will shred labor contracts (somehow, AIG bonus contracts are sacrosanct, but union worker contracts can be shredded in a heartbeat). Indeed, many analysts believe this is the administration's ultimate goal.

<snip>

http://www.alternet.org/workplace/134389/is_obama%27s_car_czar_plotting_to_crush_the_auto_unions/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Obama could be a one term President if that happens
He will lose a very large contingent of organized support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. yea and like whackamole another just like him will pop up
carter was the last good man in that job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ultimate goal? What tosh
If the ultimate goal were bankruptcy the much cheaper option would have been to simply stand by and let it happen, since that's where GM for one would already be without billions in bailouts.

They can't compete with the cost structure they have. Pure and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. It might be simple but

doing it this way allows for 'plausible deniability'. This way the administration can say, 'See, we tried, but we had no choice."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. But why can't they compete?
Edited on Wed Apr-01-09 07:51 AM by Kalyke
They're the top-selling car company in the world. Their sales are down, but so are Ford's, Toyota's, Honda's, etc.

They can't compete because, unlike Japan, American automobile companies are NOT subsidized by the government and their workers are not give single-payer and/or universal health care.

I say we level the playing field by providing single-payer health insurance NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Geez, that makes too much sense.

Always ask, "who profits?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good story on NPR this morning about what sort of options GM
and Chrysler have.

Next few months should paint a very clear picture of where the administration stands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. we`ll see when the union bill comes up for the vote...
where obama stands on the future of the unions in america.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. Sad sichiation for all concerned. I wish they could fix it in spite of the shredder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. More likely, he is playing hardball and "chicken" with GM's bondholders.
Bondholders know that bankruptcy means their bonds will be worthless. He can't come out and say this. He is a tough, smart negotiator.

Nothing about President Obama indicates to me that he is out to get unions. He would go against his beliefs (not to mention that he is a smart politician who knows which side his bread is buttered on).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Why the appointment of Rattner?
In the same story, of course, we get hedge fund shark Steve Rattner -- a huge Democratic fundraiser on Wall Street -- bashing Hindery for backing populist Democratic candidates for local and national office.

And that's the big story here: Leo Hindery, one of the few business leaders to use his wealth to challenge deregulation, corporate trade deals and anti-worker policies was blacklisted by the Obama administration well before the Daschle flap ever happened -- and he was blacklisted because he dared to clash with the same Wall Street Democrats whose corporate-backed policies destroyed the economy.

You can say this is just theory -- just a single example. But that's willful ignorance, as the Hindery scalping is only one chapter in what has been one long narrative arc whereby economic progressives have been deliberately shut out of top administration jobs. Just step back and think about it for a minute: Amid a stable of eminently qualified and well-respected progressives like James Galbraith, Joseph Stiglitz, Robert Reich, Paul Krugman and Larry Mishel, Obama has chosen Rubin sycophants like Larry Summers and Tim Geithner to run the economy -- the same Larry Summers who pushed the repeal of the Glass-Steagal Act, the same Geithner who masterminded the kleptocratic bank bailout, the same duo whose claim to fame is their personal connections to Rubin, a disgraced Citigroup executive at the center of the current meltdown. And the list of Rubin sycophants keeps getting longer, from Peter Orszag to Jason Furman.

<snip>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/the-untold-daschle-story_b_163685.html

Steven "Steve" Lawrence Rattner is an American financier and private equity investor. He is one of the four founding partners of the private investment firm Quadrangle Group, which invests media and communications companies globally.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Rattner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. That's exactly what they are doing - here is the update from Reuters
this morning:

GM said the automaker was focused on restructuring more quickly and would use the next two months to seek cost-cutting deals with bondholders and the United Auto Workers union.

"Our focus is on accelerating the speed of our operational restructuring and reducing liabilities and debt on the balance sheet," said GM spokeswoman Renee Rashid-Merem. "During the next 60 days, we will work aggressively on restructuring our financial obligations."


cite: http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE53003A20090401





UAW is one of the largest and most diverse unions in North America, with members in virtually every sector of the economy... The UAW has about 513,000 active members and more than 575,000 retired members in the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico. cite: http://www.uaw.org/about/uawmembership.html]


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corruptmewithpower Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
10. If Obama was anti-auto unions they'd be in bankrupcy court now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC