|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 12:30 PM Original message |
Anyone else think the protestor smashing thru @ the RBS window looks like a military type? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yes, it's really typical behavior |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
2. First thing I thought when viewing that picture: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 02:40 PM Response to Reply #2 |
48. First thing I thought: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
3. Oh Heaven Forbid we even suggest that Big Brother would have covert Ops such as this! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. What is a protester supposed to look like? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geegollygosh (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
5. ...or maybe he's more interested in causes than looking the part... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 12:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Most protestors aren't violent. The one's that are, do a great disservice to the cause. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geegollygosh (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 12:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. But, the reason you chose to back up your suspicion was that he looked "clean cut" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:00 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. I suspicious of those who turn violent because agent provocateurs have been used |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 12:56 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Unlikely. He's probably a government agent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:02 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Someone who looks like a government agent trying to get anarchists to follow his lead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:39 PM Response to Reply #17 |
31. Apparently you're unfamiliar with such events at the GOP convention 2008. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
6. I've got a "high and tight" and I am not a "military type". I just prefer clean cut |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:15 PM Response to Reply #6 |
22. And of course, the clean cut look really blends in with a mob of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 02:15 PM Response to Reply #22 |
36. I've known plenty of anarchist types with tight haircuts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 02:39 PM Response to Reply #22 |
45. Protip: Other countries are not America, and often have different subcultures. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
7. That sounds like the RNC Convention= a story going around is that a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
8. It's not unprecedented. Remember the SPP protests in Quebec? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 02:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
39. i remember that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
10. Yes, but so do these soccer hooligans... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 12:51 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. The difference to me is that those are dudes wanting to rumble. This is a man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 12:59 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I saw it all live |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
16. Hard to say for certain...but yes, standard procedure is to discredit protesters... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-02-09 10:05 AM Response to Reply #16 |
129. very standard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
18. Great disguise, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
19. I doubt it. What do the police benefit by starting a riot? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:09 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Yes, police never join for action. Nor would certain elements wish to cause damage in order |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:13 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. didn't say that. I"m just not a zebra person. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 02:33 PM Response to Reply #21 |
40. You crack me up. There are several instances ... but you will not stop adoring "authority" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:14 PM Response to Reply #40 |
57. Deleted message |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:22 PM Response to Reply #57 |
62. As always, you default to the cheap shot. You truly have no shame ... that must suck. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:37 PM Response to Reply #62 |
81. I'm snarky but honest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 06:07 PM Response to Reply #81 |
111. Perhaps a little willfully ignorant? Here's a video of alleged London Police Brutality with ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 06:00 PM Response to Reply #57 |
110. Unfortunate for you to believe that the London Police do NOT have a history of CORRUPT Officers: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-02-09 09:59 AM Response to Reply #21 |
128. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:38 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. And in other instances they're simply "following orders," even if those orders aren't made public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:18 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. PR. If a riot starts, they get to blame the protesters, and if a riot does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 05:51 PM Response to Reply #25 |
109. Exactly. It's not like this is a new thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
23. Anarchists don't need provocateurs to smash windows for them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:41 PM Response to Reply #23 |
33. Many intelligent Anarchists wouldn't resort to property damage or violence... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 02:10 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Yeah, but there are stupid anarchists out there too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 02:18 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Being non-violent doesn't = "angelic." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 02:27 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. I think you know very well what I mean. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 02:38 PM Response to Reply #38 |
44. You're missing the point: within the context of protests where the M$M will intentionally use... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 02:55 PM Response to Reply #44 |
50. No, I'm not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:08 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. We'll just have to agree to disagree then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:18 PM Response to Reply #33 |
60. Yes, but many would. Do you really think Black Bloc anarchists would shrink from breaking windows? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
24. I see one "protestor" and no less than SIX photographers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:38 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. uh, that's a still. I watched it live, and it looked quite spontaneous and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peregrine Took (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
26. Just odd how this clean cut, military looking lad decided to be the first ONE to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:35 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Not really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:42 PM Response to Reply #27 |
34. Yeah, this guy is trying for the chav aesthetic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azureblue (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
28. staged photo op |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 01:40 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. sorry no. I watched it live. oh, and there were quite a few window breakers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 02:37 PM Response to Reply #32 |
41. Yes, and those scrappy "window breakers" are far more EVIL than the CEOs who bankrupt the ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 02:40 PM Response to Reply #41 |
47. Nobody has ever claimed anything like that. You're silly. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:03 PM Response to Reply #47 |
53. or just terminally addicted to tossing out utter bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:32 PM Response to Reply #47 |
68. It was a comment. However, do you feel guilty? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:41 PM Response to Reply #68 |
86. So you admit, then, that nobody had claimed anything of the sort, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 11:15 PM Response to Reply #86 |
119. You're hopeless! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:02 PM Response to Reply #41 |
52. grow up, dear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:26 PM Response to Reply #52 |
64. You can't change, can you? With time, your behavior is increasingly rude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:34 PM Response to Reply #64 |
72. You should talk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:39 PM Response to Reply #72 |
83. I was not addressing this to you. p.s. stop following me around - we're not dating. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:48 PM Response to Reply #83 |
95. Strangely, you replied to one of my comments before I replied to yours. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 11:13 PM Response to Reply #95 |
117. We are obviously not communicating and are now entwined into one-ups-man-ship. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
42. Everyone knows protestors never break things. It must be the government! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
43. Check out this video about 45 seconds in... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
46. Not all anarchists are crusties. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
49. amazing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 02:58 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. amazing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:11 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:13 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Agreed. It speaks to the efficacy of the methods of thought control |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:26 PM Response to Reply #56 |
65. Right...only those who agree with you are capable of thinking for themselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:29 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. No alternative explanation to "big brother" is allowed. If provided, it's "conspiracy" ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:35 PM Response to Reply #66 |
77. Ironic, considering that "Big Brother did it" is the only explanation you'll accept for anything. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:42 PM Response to Reply #77 |
87. No, it's a possibility that FRIGHTENS the shit out of some so much that they have to trash me so ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:46 PM Response to Reply #87 |
92. Yes, and what about the possibility that the protester is actually an alien from space? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:52 PM Response to Reply #92 |
99. Oh, now you've done it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:54 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. David Icke is a great example of the pitfalls of "but you must consider the POSSIBILITY!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 04:05 PM Response to Reply #100 |
105. Reptilians peed in my cornflakes today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 04:35 PM Response to Reply #87 |
107. Even tho I basically agree w/you on the possibility of 'plant' involvement, I'd disagree that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:44 PM Response to Reply #66 |
88. Find a mirror. Take a good, long look in it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 06:12 PM Response to Reply #88 |
112. Why are you so threatened at the mere possibility that not all violence is fomented by protesters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 07:34 PM Response to Reply #112 |
113. I'm not, and I'm tired of your patronizing attitude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 11:00 PM Response to Reply #113 |
116. You have been following me and responding in a condescending way. What the hell makes you think ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 11:44 PM Response to Reply #116 |
120. You are deluding yourself. It's months since we last conversed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-02-09 12:12 AM Response to Reply #120 |
123. I believe that you are in denial but are 100% convinced otherwise. My condolences. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-02-09 10:19 PM Response to Reply #123 |
131. I really don't care what you believe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:16 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. So wait. Your argument is that it is actually more likely that a window broken in a demonstration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:24 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. ROFL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:33 PM Response to Reply #63 |
69. And you are using a common style of argumentation called 'moving the goalposts'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:35 PM Response to Reply #69 |
76. don't be ridiculous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:55 PM Response to Reply #76 |
102. My mistake; I referenced the wrong message (ie, not yours) upthread. Sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:59 PM Response to Reply #102 |
104. no worry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:34 PM Response to Reply #63 |
75. All speculation that it might be a cop is pretty much invalid, yes, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:36 PM Response to Reply #75 |
79. NO, it's not. It's only INVALID to people who "embrace authority" without question. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:38 PM Response to Reply #79 |
82. It's invalid to people who embrace empiricism. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:44 PM Response to Reply #82 |
89. Just like the Authority Figures admired, you will not even entertain the possibility that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:57 PM Response to Reply #89 |
103. And you're not entertaining the possibility that it was a reptilian humanoid, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:34 PM Response to Reply #58 |
74. No, the argument is that "it's possible" but you are so threatened by the possibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:37 PM Response to Reply #74 |
80. Conspiracy theorists always claim people are "threatened" by their bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:45 PM Response to Reply #80 |
91. But you are... look at all the haranguing and gnashing of teeth. You are FREAKED. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:49 PM Response to Reply #91 |
96. I've always thought conspiracy theorists need to believe they frighten people because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 05:44 PM Response to Reply #96 |
108. As the GOP's Saint Ronnie would quip, "There you go again!" ... It's "a tell." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:20 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. most pathetic "argument" I've seen in a while. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:44 PM Response to Reply #61 |
90. that is not a rebuttal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:17 PM Response to Reply #49 |
59. bzzzt. I am ridiculing the automatic assumption by people on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:30 PM Response to Reply #59 |
67. Newsflash: You're repeating old behavior patterns that do not serve your intelligence nor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:33 PM Response to Reply #67 |
71. rofl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:48 PM Response to Reply #71 |
94. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:33 PM Response to Reply #59 |
70. It's you who makes assumptions, no one but you suggested " all cops are evil pigs ..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:36 PM Response to Reply #70 |
78. yes, most protesters are peaceful. duh. did you figure that out all by your little |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:47 PM Response to Reply #78 |
93. Yes, we all must LEARN because if we disagree with "certain people" we are just plain WRONG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:41 PM Response to Reply #59 |
85. no one did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:49 PM Response to Reply #59 |
98. "I'm ridiculing anyone ..." No, you end up ridiculing EVERYONE except those who agree with you. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arbusto_baboso (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
73. Straw Man operations are nothing new. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:39 PM Response to Reply #73 |
84. We have just reached an all-time record for "most inaccurate use of the term 'straw man.'" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 07:39 PM Response to Reply #84 |
114. I believe the term is "agent provocateur". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
97. I wonder if he was one of the eight; arrested? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
101. It Looks Like Morrissey |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
106. My first thought. The distinct possibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Dawn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
115. Video of Canadian agents-provocateurs caught in the act. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
118. I think anyone smashing a window without a balaclava is likely to be a provocateur. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 11:52 PM Response to Reply #118 |
121. Right...while provocateurs want everyone to be able to ID them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-02-09 12:21 AM Response to Reply #121 |
124. And you KNOW all these "tells" because you worked for a left leaning publication? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-02-09 10:15 PM Response to Reply #124 |
130. No, because I have basic common sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moondust (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-01-09 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
122. Profile much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-02-09 12:30 AM Response to Original message |
125. Ah yes. Every protester who breaks something, hits something, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-02-09 12:33 AM Response to Reply #125 |
126. We've already had our full dose of hyperbole on both sides. No need to stoke the fires |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-02-09 12:39 AM Response to Original message |
127. responding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC