First, if you are thinking about posting a reply that goes something like "But the shooter did not work for IBM", please read the rest of this journal first. Even if Voong did not work for Big Blue, his community has suffered from the recent round of lay offs and job outsourcing that IBM has implemented. Nothing happens in a vacuum. When the nation's big employers start moving jobs overseas, they affect everyone, not just those who got the pink slips.
And yes, I know this is a long journal. That is the only kind I write.
Into. Reuters has a rep for downplaying charges of “terrorism”, and yet they went out of their way today to make a domestic shooting in New York state look like an act of terrorism planned by the Taliban. Why? Here is what I found when I did a little internet investigating.
I. Reuters Cries “Terrorism!” As the nation’s jobless rate climbs, we have seen an increase in unemployed male shooters whose main motivation for killing seems to be their desperate financial situation. For instance, there was a shooting in Omaha, Nebraska in December 2007
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16961899Wearing a camouflage vest and a black backpack, Robert A. Hawkins began firing as shoppers and employees at the Westroads Mall scrambled for cover in dressing rooms, clothing racks, offices and storage areas.
Hawkins had recently split with his girlfriend and had been fired from a job at McDonald's. He had a criminal record and had been kicked out of his parents' house.
More tales of unemployed shooters can be read at the links below:
http://www.ocregister.com/news/police-old-year-1986618-boy-callhttp://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=fe3c0a263611f4eb3863936c2f893904http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/jul2008/knox-j31.shtmlhttp://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5goJA5vFRxnmibf1hUwG8-7WE2aAAhttp://www.spartacuslives.org/node/20815Now, local news sources in Binghamton, New York are suggesting that the man who committed the shootings may have been recently laid off by IBM.
http://wcbstv.com/breakingnewsalerts/binghamton.hostage.shooting.2.975228.html Hinchey said his office was told by four sources the gunman was recently laid off by IBM, but an IBM representative told wcbstv.com on Friday night there was no record of a Jiverly Voong ever working at the company. Investigators said Jiverly Voong also went by the name Lin Voong.
There are good reasons why IBM would want to disavow any knowledge of Voong. For years, IBM has earned the loyalty of its employees by never, ever firing or laying them off. But that was before outsourcing became the rule rather than the exception in the United States. Here is a story from last month about IBM’s plan to let American workers go and move jobs to India.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/03/26/ibm.outsourcing/IBM's reported plans to lay off thousands of U.S. workers and outsource many of those jobs to India, even as the company angles for billions in stimulus money, doesn't sit well with employee rights advocates.
At a time when unemployment in the United States continues to rise to record levels (check out this March report
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm which describes our
8.5% unemployment rate ), this is not the way to get good pr.
Now, imagine how much worse IBM’s pr would look if the nation’s major news outlets were to establish a link between its outsourcing policy and the New York State murders?
Fortunately for IBM, Reuters decided to send the American public up the wrong trail. Today, Fox News told us that Reuters told them that a Taliban chief, Baituallah Mehsud had
told them that he ordered the Vietnamese immigrant to attack an immigration center in New York state.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,512537,00.htmlThe Vietnamese-American Taliban? Say what?
The FBI was quick to rebut the story. Reuters even published their response---after the original story was already in wide circulation.
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N04368480.htmNote, from the Fox link above,
U.S. officials were not immediately available for comment about Mehsud's claim, Reuters reported, and one Pakistani security analyst dismissed the claim as a publicity stunt.
Reuters published a news story meant to link the Taliban and Binghamton in the minds of U.S. news consumers, even though Pakistan had rejected the terrorism claim. Worse, Reuters was so eager to print the piece, they could not even be bothered to get any comments from U.S. law enforcement officials first. Is this the same Reuters which had a policy of not calling acts of violence acts “terrorism” in the wake of 9/11?
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/reuters.aspWhat happened to Reuters between then and now?
II. Connect the Dots 1: Reuters and IBM Like almost all news organizations today, Reuters news is just a piece of a much larger corporation which has its fingers in lots of pies. For instance
Reuters Market Data System advertises itself as
a robust, resilient platform that can support huge throughputs of data, not just to the trading floor but to every part of your organisation. A platform that won’t be flooded by the even greater data volumes forecast for future years, one that combines direct and consolidated feeds in addition to internal information for full market access.
http://about.reuters.com/productinfo/rmds/And it boasts
Reuters Market Data System (RMDS) is the fastest growing open data integration platform in the world today and encapsulates 35 years of Reuters engineering experience in data distribution and integration.
https://loginabout.reuters.com/Home/RMDS.aspxLast year, Reuters was purchased by the Thomson Group, in yet another merger of mega-giants that the Bush administration rubber stamped. Journalists at Reuters were alarmed.
Robert Peston, business editor at BBC News, stated that this has worried Reuters journalists, both because they are concerned that Reuters' journalism business will be marginalized by the financial data provision business of the combined company, and because of the threat to Reuters' reputation for unbiased journalism by the appearance of one majority shareholder.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomson_ReutersNow, I know even less about computers and their operating systems than I do about economics. To me, Linux is just a misspelling of Linus, the Peanuts character. However, Google is the great equalizer. I decided to Google “Reuters” and “IBM”. Turns out that the two are partners in Reuters Market System as described in this 2003 online article.
http://www.open-mag.com/1225339824.shtml Without going into the details of the contract, I can tell you that IBM is helping us to support their platform. No modifications to apps themselves being made, same RMDS software that is running today. Under this agreement, what would probably happen is that you as a customer would call Reuters and say that you would like to run RMDS on a blade system with Linux. Reuters and IBM in their close relationship would work together, with a good division of labor. IBM is relatively well versed in its product and we’re relatively well versed in ours.
Here is another article, this one from 2007, about the business ties between Reuters (Market Data) and IBM.
Reuters is one IBM Business Partner that has already sought to harness the power of IBM WebSphere MQ Low Latency Messaging. Reuters recently announced the development of a new distribution component for their premier Market Data System, RMDS 6, the Multicast Distributor (MCD). The MCD will harness the power of IBM's Low Latency Messaging technology, and is designed as an ultra low latency device to enable the distribution of vast amounts of data from RMDS to thousands of client applications.
http://www.sys-con.com/node/456958 III. Connect the Dots 2: IBM and Binghamton If you go to the Binghamton web page you will learn
At the same time Johnson City (formerly Lestershire) and the planned community of Endicott (incorporated in 1906) were growing, so too was a firm that started in Binghamton in 1889 as the Bundy Manufacturing Company. Involved in time clock production, it merged with several other firms and went through a variety of names before hiring Thomas Watson, Sr. in 1914. His corporate leadership moved the company into a new era, and in 1924 he changed the name of the company to International Business Machines. IBM has since become the area's leading employer.
http://www.cityofbinghamton.com/history.aspEven if Voong was not laid off by IBM, the area in which he lived had suffered economically due to its “largest employers” recent practices. From the Associated Press:
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97B629O0&show_article=1 At the junction of the Susquehanna and the Chenango rivers, the Binghamton area was the home to Endicott-Johnson shoe company and the birthplace of IBM, which between them employed tens of thousands of workers before the shoe company closed a decade ago and IBM downsized in recent years.
The economic effects of IBM's downsizing on Binghamtom are so bad that a scholarly paper was written on the subject. Here is the abstract:
This article conceptualizes, describes, and analyzes the phenomenon of corporate downsizing and the experience of worker displacement as a process of work and employment change that occurs within the context of structural changes in the economy, large firms and labor markets. The research is based on a case study of displaced IBM computer and Link aerospace workers in Binghamton, New York. Research participants encountered a process of displacement that began before job loss, as the firms abandoned longstanding paternalistic work relations and altered their internal labor market structures. Following job loss, displaced workers negotiated a job search in a declining Binghamton economy and a competitive local labor market. In subsequent employment, the majority of those in the study experienced significant work and employment change associated with downward mobility. The findings suggest that in the new economy, the concept of worker displacement should be thought of in more expansive terms than the more narrow and conventional definition that is often associated with it. Workers' experiences of downsizing, displacement and employment change were not simply, or even primarily, associated with job loss, but were characterized by significant departure from objective conditions and subjective meanings of work and of being workers.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/tc58b847btlbne1y/ In Studs Terkel's
Hard Times , the author recorded stories about the Great Depression. More than poverty or deprivation, people hated being without work. Work defines the middle class in the United States. Take away someone's employment and you take away his sense of identity. The FDR jobs creation programs were successful, because they got people back to work---and helped them reclaim their sense of hope.
In too many American communities today, hope is being outsourced to India---and people become scared and angry, a combination that is dangerous in a country where guns can literally be purchased in your local grocery store.
IV. It Does Not Matter If Voong Never Worked for IBM Early reports that Voong was laid off by IBM have touched a nerve in a nation where violent crimes committed by victims of the recession/depression have become almost commonplace---and where people blame their misery on corporate greed.
IBM has been quick to deny that it had anything to do with Voong.
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/IT-Management/Binghamton-Gunman-is-Reportedly-Laid-Off-IBMer-408098/However, where Voong may have worked is beside the point. Communities suffers when a large local employer decides to ship its jobs overseas in the middle of a recession. Businesses that cater to the (former) employees of IBM have to cut back. It becomes more difficult for everyone to get or keep a job.
Unfortunately, the press in this country is now controlled by a handful of major corporations. Newspapers and TV news programs once made their money by providing in depth coverage of events for news consumers. Now, these same folks are little more than pr spokesmen for their parent companies. The financial interests of the corporate masters dictate what story various news outlets are willing to tell. If outsourcing is good for Big Business's all important bottom line, then outsourcing can never, ever be blamed for any of the problems which plague our country.