|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
FourScore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 12:39 PM Original message |
Famed Gitmo Lawyer Facing Time in Prison For Writing Letter to Obama Detailing Torture of Client |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
1. Guess this shows who the Pentagon really works for, doesn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 02:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Ain't that the truth. And Obama needs to not put up with it. ASAP, for his own safety as well as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomm2thumbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 05:55 AM Response to Reply #1 |
21. Oh, I don't know - I think the letter speaks for itself... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 12:11 PM Response to Reply #1 |
26. What? If anything it seems to me to show just the opposite. If they don't work for the President . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
2. This shit needs to stop, right now. Since when does the government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConcernedCanuk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 05:31 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. Since when does the government get to breach attorney-client privilege?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ezdidit (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 09:29 AM Response to Reply #16 |
23. there are no "rules" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
3. So that's the action taken for the letter that was heavily censored |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 02:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. This is intimidation, pure and simple. And bet me whoever is pushing this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 04:02 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. It will be telling to see how this plays out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
4. Hopefully Obama will become involved in this and correct this travesty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TroglodyteScholar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 05:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
17. How can Obama hide behind chain of command? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imdjh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 08:51 AM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Controlling access to the President is part of what the President does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBigotBasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
5. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressIn2008 (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
6. I don't know how many more excuses can be made, at this point. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBigotBasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 01:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. There is 8 years worth of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
7. Some DU backthreads... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
williesgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
9. It's not exactly like Obama doesn't have security clearance! This is bullshit and must stop. rec'd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
williesgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
10. deleted dup message |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
11. and when the ABA is put on the spot, who do you think they will support?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Lane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 10:41 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. The ABA has frequently opposed Bush administration depredations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barbtries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
12. he deserves a medal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
19. Good man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
20. Wait, the privilege team redacted the memo . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
24. As long as Gates and other members of the Rummy/Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 01:40 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. And doesn't Clive still have other active cases at Gitmo? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jefferson23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
25. Holy shit, this is a terrible indicator of what is ahead, they must be sweating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pberq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
27. Thanks for posting - nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC