Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you believe having more accessible, affordable, non-stigmatic mental health care available could

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 02:42 PM
Original message
Poll question: Do you believe having more accessible, affordable, non-stigmatic mental health care available could
could have prevented the recent rash of shootings?

I vote yes,it could have. And yes, we need more accessible, affordable, non-stigmatic mental health care
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another yes vote for a sane response to the recent rash of preventable tragedies
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I know there are other issues, poverty, education, etc, that also impact
things. Societal cultures, worshipping the almighty dollar, etc.

But wanted to limit this poll to this one thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am wondering why the vote for no. I'd like to hear reasoning.
thanks. I have been wrong before, and will be wrong in the future. Am wondering why you voted no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I'd assume that'd be a "some folks are just assholes" type of thing
Which is true, of course, but I'd also bet the overwhelming majority of these situations were people who had some mental issue or another that could very well have been addressed beforehand.

I wonder if the discussion of the mental aspects of the shootings lately is going to help or harm the stigma problems about mental illness, though. It feels like a catch-22 sort of situation, and that depresses me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yep. Preach it from the rooftops.
Ask yourself why people do what they do when it comes to killing others. Is it because they own a gun?

I don't think anybody kills other people because they own a gun.

Stop violence by preventing it by dealing with the issues that cause it, not the tools used by the perp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Nice to know I'm not alone in this thought.
There are other reasons, big reasons, that contribute. Poverty, USAnian pop-culture, worshipping the almighty dollar that the cost of losing your soul, etc.

Deal with the issues. Next up, why do mass deaths get more notice than the higher numbers of individual deaths due to preventable causes or murders or accidents? But that is for another topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I was thinking about writing an OP on just that
How many people die while we wait on real health and mental care, and to top it off we see some companies as too big to fail but we see the little guy failing as nothing and their own fault.

You reduce crime not by controlling what people use to commit it, but by removing the reasons for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, also more effective enforcement of existing laws
And maybe an English language proficiency requirement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. An "English language proficiency requirement" for what?
To be in the USA? To own a gun? To kill people? To get mental health care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. To buy a gun
Edited on Sun Apr-05-09 03:00 PM by slackmaster
It seems that poor English was at the root of Jiverly Wong's problems. If he really couldn't hack the language, he would have failed a proficiency test just as James Poprowski would have failed the Brady background check had he attempted to acquire a firearm through lawful channels.

I am being sarcastic BTW - I don't believe in English language proficiency requirements other than for positions where it is obviously necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Thanks for the clarification.
Re the sarcasm, I can't keep everyone straight who supports which views around the gun issue.

As far as legal requirements for buying guns, problem I run across is those of us who are law abiding citizens follow the law but seems most of those who end up shooting people like this aren't law abiding citizens, can get guns outside the law.

But that is for another topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes, and recommended
.
.
.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. Single-payer health care, including medical, dental, vision, and mental health.
Edited on Sun Apr-05-09 03:18 PM by TahitiNut
The "loss of job" MUST be understood as both a loss of 'identity' (particularly for males) and a loss of all forms of health care. It is, in effect, a disenfranchisement ... and the 'message' is that the person isn't even worth keeping alive. We live in an increasingly narcissistic society where we only exist to the extent we're USEFUL to someone with money. Attaining and maintaining one's own mental and emotional health while IMMERSED in such a flood of dysfunction is a task not many are up to.

I would also say that our public schools are remiss in not including, as a part of the core curriculum, "Health" classes that include physical education (exercise and activity) as well as emotional/mental health. It's ridiculous that someone can graduate high school and not comprehend the basics of depression, codependency, and other common mental health issues. We pretend to "prepare the mind" but we fail in teaching critical thinking ... or thinking at all.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. yes, but as a society we're not mature enough to NOT stigmatize the mentally ill
This country is so self-absorbed, so CHILDISH - we won't have a decent mental health program even if we get universal health care. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. As individuals though, we can. And we can work towards getting decent mental health care
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Right, let's just not bother trying, then! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yes real healthcare, not cult healthcare! k+r, n/t
Edited on Sun Apr-05-09 04:52 PM by ColbertWatcher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. Definitely. Sometimes I think this country is insane
We let everything go to hell in the name of capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
20. and a fairer country as a whole, and a rational criminal justice system
Edited on Sun Apr-05-09 10:11 PM by upi402
and I'd like a pony too!
I voted YES of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. so could an authoritative totalitarian regime that outlawed guns, and harshly punished offenders.
i grew up in a town with a state 'mental health center'- and 'non-stigmatic mental health care' is more about changing long-ingrained public perceptions- which would require a somewhat enlightened populace- which is still a very long way off. they have to want to be enlightened first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
22. Yes and in Florida you can't pass a background check if you have a record of a mental health problem
A record of a mental health problem should be a disqualification for anyone applying for a gun permit of any kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
23. Not really.
You have to admit you have a problem before doing something to solve it. I guess it depends on the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
24. Of course. And it's not really even about stigma at that level.
We don't have a mental health care system that works, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
25. I don't know
Because sociopaths are not mentally ill.
They do not change with therapy or meds or anything else.

However if you want to help the really mentally ill or those with psychiatric injuries,yeah having more accessible, affordable, non-stigmatic mental health care available would help.
But be aware it won't help any sociopaths,narcissists or those with authoritarian personalities learn to care or to empathize or do the right things because sociopaths cannot 'grow' a conscience..from nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. I agree, having lived with one. Hence the "could" in my OP
It won't solve all violence, in no way. But I think it could help, esp with those who are capable of having a conscience, but having difficulties. Having lived with one of those also.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC