Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Salon: What you never knew about Columbine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:34 PM
Original message
Salon: What you never knew about Columbine
What you never knew about Columbine

As a Salon reporter, Dave Cullen exploded myths about the tragic school shooting, now the subject of his new book. He talks about what the media bungled -- and what still surprises him.


By Joan Walsh

Dave Cullen's "Columbine" is a chilling page-turner, a striking accomplishment given that Cullen's likely readers almost certainly know how the tragic story ends. Twelve students and one beloved teacher died at the suburban Denver high school on April 20, 1999, the worst school shooting rampage until two years ago, when Cho Seung-Hui slaughtered 32 classmates at Virginia Tech.

I know more about the Columbine story than most of Cullen's audience: I was Cullen's editor at Salon 10 years ago, on that awful day when the cable networks told us teenagers were dying in Littleton, and he told me over the phone he'd head there immediately. Little did either of us know then that he'd still be at Columbine a decade later.

So I can't be dispassionate about this book. I will point to raves from Time and Newsweek before offering my own personal observation: I knew Cullen was a dogged reporter and a terrific writer, but even I was blown away by the pacing and story-telling he mastered in "Columbine," a disturbing, inspiring work of art.


In "Columbine," Cullen is surprisingly but appropriately modest (appropriately, because it makes the book better) about his own role in exploding trite Columbine myths. You'll read his book and learn that the smartest crime investigators were frustrated and bedeviled by national and local media jumping on specious favorite theories about the killers and their victims — theories that investigators knew from the beginning weren't true. The killers weren't part of the Trench Coat Mafia, they weren't gay, they didn't target jocks or minority students. Eric Harris was a psychopath, but Dylan Klebold was a depressive who'd shown little capacity for hatred and violence.

Maybe most explosive, against the backdrop of the strong suburban Denver evangelical culture, was the story that student Cassie Bernall was killed because of her Christian faith, after she said "yes" when Dylan Klebold asked if she believed in God. The tale simply wasn't true, despite the fact that Bernall's mother, Misty, and the girl's evangelical church launched an campaign around Cassie's martyrdom that culminated in Misty Bernall's moving memoir, "She Said Yes," which wound up on the New York Times bestseller list and won her interviews with "Larry King Live" and "The Today Show."

What you won't learn, except in the footnotes, is that it was Cullen who broke most of the crucial Columbine myth-debunking stories and expanded on others. He was an army of one against the dozens sent by large national dailies, the news magazines, and local and national television networks. But he had key advantages: He lived there, he's charming and ingratiating, he's got an instinct for bullshit, and he's got a heart bigger than most hearts I know. He suffered through the Columbine story with the locals after the national stars went away; he also had the distance from local politics that a national outlet provided him. Still, what got him the story was his passion and smarts and sensitivity — he knew how to wrangle information out of traumatized teens and families and investigators because he was traumatized, too; I'll never forget some of our conversations when he talked through his own despair at what he was seeing...

http://www.salon.com/books/int/2009/04/06/cullen/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. SUWEET!
I have been wondering what happened to Dave Cullen's book idea.. especially in the last few days.

Thanks for posting this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. And still "journalists" tut-tut, and tell us how much we need them...
and will miss them when the newspapers go under.

Go bankrupt, fuckers. We'll find a way to live our lives without you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Even Salon missed the REAL history of the FIRST Columbine massacre and Ludlow massacre of 1914
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbine_Mine_Massacre

The first Columbine Massacre, sometimes called the Columbine Mine massacre to distinguish it from the Columbine High School massacre, occurred in 1927, in the town of Serene, Colorado. A fight broke out between state police and a group of striking coal miners, during which the coal miners were attacked with machine guns.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludlow_Massacre

refers to the violent deaths of 20 people, 11 of them children, during an attack by the Colorado National Guard on a tent colony of 1,200 striking coal miners and their families at Ludlow, Colorado in the U.S. on April 20, 1914. .............Baldwin-Felts had a reputation for aggressive strike breaking. Agents shone searchlights on the tent villages at night and randomly fired into the tents, occasionally killing and maiming people. They used an improvised armored car, mounted with a M1895 Colt-Browning machine gun that the union called the "Death Special," to patrol the camp's perimeters. The steel-covered car was built in the CF&I plant in Pueblo from the chassis of a large touring sedan. Because of frequent sniping on the tent colonies, miners dug protective pits beneath the tents where they and their families could seek shelter.


ANYBODY recognize the Date APRIL 20th?


If you ever doubt that there is an anti labor bias to the news then why has it NEVER been brought up that there was OTHER MASSACRES on April 20th other than the Second Columbine?

Even this self congratulatory Fuk who wrote a whole frikkin book fails to mention that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. "Self congratulatory fuk???" The guy wasn't writing a book about massacres that occured on a given
date.

He was writing about one particular event at one particular school.

Why are you so annoyed with this guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Hitlers birthday.
A number of conspiracy theorists believe that there's some connection (motivated, in observance of), between intentional acts of mass violence and the dates on or close to Hitlers birthdate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Cullen is a local-one who was there from the very first and did all
he could to counter the propaganda from day one. You are way off base. His book was not about APRIL 20, nor "all violent incidents linked to the name, "columbine." It was about the Columbine School Shootings. PERIOD.

As someone who is also very pro-labor, I understand your frustration with the anti-labor bias in the MSM, but Cullen doesn't deserve your wrath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. Interesting.
People in Denver have been speculating about a CIA connection since the afternoon of the shootup and nothing that's occured since would lead me to doubt it. If anyone is interested, Google it up and prepare to be shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Ah, because it's not relevant to his investigation
of what happened at Columbine High School in April of 1999.

Just a thought, but maybe you ought to do your own research and write your own book about this event instead of blaming others for not writing about something they had no expressed interest in writing about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I think it depends on what he's written.
If he's just repeating a slightly less maudlin version of the original story, as the OP suggests, then I think there's legitimate grounds for objecting. It took all of about two minutes on Google to discover that the story as officially reported has some sizable holes, for example the fact that a number of students identified -- by name -- several other shooters who were never arrested or publicly named. Take a look at this piece for example, which is based on an examination of the official report:
.....................................
The Columbine Cause

"The Columbine Cause" by Evan Long raises questions about the April 20, 1999 attack on Columbine High School which have gone unaddressed or unanswered by corporate and state media, including: Why do counts of the ballistics evidence charts yield totals far greater than the three hundred-odd shots officially stated by law enforcement officials to have been fired? Why did students and teachers inside the school during the attack describe up to a dozen distinct shooters, some of whom some of them were able to identify by name as neither Eric Harris nor Dylan Klebold? Why were the people of the world told that the attack was a "wake-up call" when some Columbine students knew it to have been "the big rumor" for up to two years in advance? There is much more to the story of the attack on Columbine than has been widely made known.

http://evanlong.buzznet.com/user/video/3746811/the-columbine-cause/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democracyinkind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't really get the hostility

...any sane discussion of why we produce these kind of massacres on a regular basis when they are so uncommon everywhere else should be invited, not shouted down.

America has no regard for its labor history, I'll grant that.
But I don't think Cullen is responsible for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. the myths that travelled overseas
revolved around the premise that Columbine was something new - when it was only new in white middle class schools
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. This is actually a pretty good example of why I was so fed up with all the conclusion-jumping
that went on here as a result of the Binghamton shootings...it's like an event happens, or is in the process of happening, and not only does everyone act as if every tidbit of information they receive about it is the pure unadulterated truth (despite the fact that false rumors fly constantly at such times), they also speculate like crazy as to the cause, projecting their own personal beliefs and prejudices on the situation without fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. Does he also make martyrs out of the "victims" of the shooting?
The real problem with school shootings is that the insane actions that the real victims are driven to, to the point where they feel they have no recourse but to pick up a gun and start killing the bullies who make their lives miserable and the administrators who stand by and do nothing, make people think that the sins of the kids who were killed are all washed away.

We're never going to solve these problems until we stop pretending that the kids who did the shootings were nothing but evil, and that the kids who were shot were angels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. Wait? You mean a PARENT of one murdered teenager LIED about what happened to her?
Edited on Mon Apr-06-09 08:42 AM by KittyWampus
that is some heavy shit right there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Not "lied", rather "is still lying"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. Did you read the article?
The journalist says multiple times that Misty Bernall really thought that what she was saying about her daughter was true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. "theories that investigators knew from the beginning weren't true."
Auh, M$M ...twas ever thus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC