|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 11:50 AM Original message |
** BREAKING: Special Prosecutor ordered in Ted Stevens Prosecution Misconduct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
1. the question? did the bu$h* justice dept. knowingly fuck this up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 11:55 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Why else would they pack it with cronies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 12:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. THe judge who ordered the criminal investigation of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 12:28 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. So, anyone have the CBC office address in DC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 12:35 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. If the 'misconduct' amounts to crimes, as the judge suggests, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 12:44 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Stevens actually spilled the beans on Cheney. There is a lot to look into about this case and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 02:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
31. They got Stevens off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 03:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
34. GMTA ... it's far too serendipitous to be a coincidence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
2. I thought he got off?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 12:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
15. Stevens got off because the Bush cronies in the DoJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 03:54 PM Response to Reply #15 |
36. You mean that all that Holder bashing around here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 12:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
18. Stephens did. The prosecution who caused him to get off won't. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
3. I called it! I KNEW that PRESIDENT Obama would do this! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 11:56 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. yes you did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 11:57 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. The trial judge did this. Presidents take care of executive decisions, not trials. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 03:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
35. Thanks for the clarity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
4. WA POST: Judge Tosses Out Stevens Conviction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 11:59 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Tell Sullivan to look over the Siegelman case and give an opinion on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 12:03 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. That occurred to me as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
9. NY Times Editorial: Mr. Holder and the Ted Stevens Case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 12:12 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Good for the NYT. Hey, L. Coyote, have you ever heard of the GOP political network |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 12:57 PM Response to Reply #17 |
26. That's the name of the conspirators behind the Iran-Contra weapons sales. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
11. guess why--the prosecutors happen to be Democrats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 01:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
29. The focus is on withholding evidence from Stevens "in order to convict" as oposed to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
12. Is there a logarithmic tense of the word IRONY? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 12:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. No, I don't think so, it’s not funny, but it is irony. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 12:44 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yowzayowzayowza (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
13. Most excellent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
16. Keep tuggin on every thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
20. Good, the mistakes were so utterly boneheaded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 02:15 PM Response to Reply #20 |
32. Just try "greedy". n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 06:10 PM Response to Reply #20 |
37. Who know who did what to mess up who how where when to fix this finish, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
25. NY Times: Judge Orders Investigation of Stevens Prosecutors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
27. Keep in mind these Prosecutors violated a direct Court Order .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
28. McClatchy: Judge orders criminal probe of Stevens case misconduct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 01:09 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. the pissed-off judge ordered this probe.....this is great news... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keepthemhonest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
33. I am sure they'll just let this guy off too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:54 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC