Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wong fired 98 shots in under a minute: 87 from a 9mm semi-auto pistol, 11 from 45 semi-auto pistol.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:24 PM
Original message
Wong fired 98 shots in under a minute: 87 from a 9mm semi-auto pistol, 11 from 45 semi-auto pistol.
Edited on Wed Apr-08-09 12:25 PM by ddeclue
:hide:

Source: CNN TV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Must have reloaded really fast.
He was prepared to do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm sure glad he couldn't get his hands on an assault weapon....
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. So...
9 mm wins?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He probably had more 9mm clips pre loaded and only one clip for his 45.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. or maybe the 45 jammed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. is that possible?
excuse my ignorance of such things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No, it's impossible.
He was apparently some sort of wizard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. What is that? 6 or 7 clips for the 9mm and 1 to 2 for the 45?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Depends on the clip size.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. DAMN!
That's just scary fast..

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Friendly PSA


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. In that case, I retract my entire argument.
Obviously there is no way he could have done this on his own. There was a second shooter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. "The more you know" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Yeah yeah whatever...
they both serve the same basic purpose, to quickly reload a firearm.

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I'm just sayin......


;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. And my two door convertible isn't my four door sedan...
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It seems pretty fast to me too.
I could see this with an assault rifle and 3 or 4 30 round clips. I would think that more time in reloading would be required with a pistol clip, most of which are between 7 and 17 rounds depending on the model.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. As you say it is simply a matter of changing magazines which takes a slow person 3 seconds to do.

And of course fewer mag changes would be necessary depending on the size of magazines.


In the end, it doesn't matter to the victims whether he used 9 10-round mags, 6 15-round mags, 5 17-round mags, 3 32-round mags, or even 1 100-round drum.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Well no but the smaller the mag the longer the reload time and the less shooting that could happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. weird.
it just doesn't seem believable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
29. How do you figure?
When the magazine empties, the slide is locked back. The shooter pushes one button with one finger and the magazine drops out of the bottom. A new magazine is slapped in, a second release unlocks the slide, chambering the first round, and the gun is ready to fire again.

Most skilled shooters, when pushed, can replace a magazine in under 1.5 seconds. I can do it in under two. A novice can do it in three with five minutes of instruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I think you spend too much time at the gun range to know what AVERAGE people can do.
You talking about what average shooting is would be like me talking about what "average" computer skills or mathematics or science skills are.

Doug D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. I haven't set foot on a range in years
I probably fire my guns maybe two or three times a year, no more than that.

The only impediment to firing a gun rapidly is intimidation...most new shooters are unfamiliar with the gun and are a little intimidated by it. Once you get over that, spraying bullets wildly is no more difficult than flicking your finger really fast. It's so easy a child can do it...as the numerous child gun deaths in our nation prove every year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Yeah and that takes practice..
I could tell you that landing a plane is easy too - and for ME it is..

Doesn't make that statement true for truly average people though.

Doug D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. Impossible? It's not even that hard really
Edited on Wed Apr-08-09 01:17 PM by Xithras
A Glock in the hands of someone with some practice can easily fire 3 rounds a second. That's 33 seconds of firing to expend 98 rounds.

Then you have reloading. I'm going to aim low and assume 13 round magazines since they're fairly common. Larger 15 or 17 round magazines would reduce these numbers further. 98 shots out of a 13 round magazine pencils out to eight magazines. Assuming three seconds for each magazine change (which is really kinda slow IMHO), that's 24 seconds dedicated to swapping magazines. Of course, we can probably assume that he walked in the door with it loaded, so the real number is probably about 21 seconds.

33 seconds of shooting and 21 seconds of reloading = 98 rounds in 54 seconds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. It would still be pretty fast for most average people who don't spend all day at the gun range.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. That really, really depends on the handgun used.
Glocks, for example, are pretty easy to fire at a high rate, expecially in a caliber like 9mm which doesn't kick much. A smooth trigger action and low kick make it easy to fire quickly. The Glock is capable of firing as fast as you can pull the trigger (IIRC, I saw a doc once claiming that they are designed to be jam-free up to 18 rounds a second, much faster than a human finger would ever hope to pull the the trigger).

When you don't care about aim and are simply trying to expend ammo as quickly as possible, three rounds a second isn't really that hard to pull off...if you have the right handgun. Even for a relative novice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. And a glock is a pretty expensive handgun..
I want to know what kind of guns the guy actually had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Just to undersand this situation better and how certain laws (or would be laws) may have applied...


have they reported models of these pistols?


Not that it matters to the victims (RIP), but in terms of what laws may have already applied or their relation to recently proposed laws, it would useful to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I don't think the problem is the type of gun.. the problem is the type of NUT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I agree, but there are those calling for reauthorized laws or new laws.


and I'd like to be armed with facts for those conversations.

But I agree, the blame resides with the shooter and his motivations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No More Bushbots Donating Member (192 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. If he fired 98 rounds in under a minute
He wouldn't have needed 98 rounds to kill 13 people.
Physically impossible to start with and if he was skilled enough to dump clips and insert new ones at that rate, his aim would have been better.
This is a bullsh*t story to advance a minority opinion.
But thanks for playing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. A great deal of supposition on your part - I'll take the cops word for it off of CNN.
You really don't know how good a shooter this guy was you are just spouting off your opinion about it.

We've no idea how many shots missed because no one has said that. Hand guns are harder to use accurately than rifles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
20. And killed only 14 people
Most of those shots were misses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
33. Could also be that there weren't more people trapped in the building to kill.
It wasn't that big a place was it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. I think he chose his targets deliberately
People who he felt had wronged him in some way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
35. Or could be that he shot everyone multiple times. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
36. And the cops entered the building 39 minutes later? Wow...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
37. There's fast...
then there's scary fast...

Mag reload...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJVoc5uJ2e4

8 shots from a revolver in 1 second/6 shots - reload - 6 shots in 2.99 seconds...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsLx5ISBXw4

:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigjoe7734 Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
40. It's pretty easy to fire that fast
When I took the Concealed Carry course in Ohio we did a draw and fire drill. Most of the guys in the class were able to fire a 10+ round magazine, reload and fire the next magazine in 6 to 8 seconds. That was with about 20 to 30 minutes of instruction. Everyone was able to put all the rounds into the target at 25 feet that way. It doesn't surprise me at all to find out that this guy blew off that many round that fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC