Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Admin. Seeks Clarification Of Saudi Definition Of "Illegitimate Occupation"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 02:27 PM
Original message
Bush Admin. Seeks Clarification Of Saudi Definition Of "Illegitimate Occupation"
Edited on Fri Mar-30-07 02:31 PM by bigtree
Bush officials, including Condi Rice, were urgently seeking clarification from Saudi Arabia today after the remarks from King Abdullah criticizing the "illegitimate foreign occupation" of Iraq. "In beloved Iraq, blood is being shed among brothers in the shadow of an illegitimate foreign occupation, and ugly sectarianism threatens civil war," the King told those gathered at an Arab Summit on Wednesday.

US Under Secretary of State Nicholas Burns said that it was possible the king’s comments could have been misrepresented by the media.

Spokesman Sean McCormack said: "I think it only stands to reason that we would be interested in understanding better what exactly King Abdullah meant by that phrase. At the briefing:

QUESTION: Sean, what exactly about the phrase "illegal occupation," which seems to be pretty cut and dried, needs to clarifying.

MCCORMACK: Well, we want to understand what the thinking is behind it.

QUESTION: Okay. And -- but you're not operating under the assumption that he misspoke or didn't mean to say?

MCCORMACK: I think it's just exactly what we said. We're going to -- we want to understand more clearly what it is exactly that he had in mind when he talked about an illegal occupation.

Yeah.

QUESTION: So in other words, you have clarified that he did indeed say this and you've checked all the translations and you're satisfied that that's what he did say?

MR. MCCORMACK: Oh, I -- you know, I can't vouch for that. I -- you know, we have obviously read the -- read a variety of different translations, but I -- you know, I can't vouch for the precise translation in those.

Rather than back away from the King's statement, Saudi Arabia's foreign minister echoed his remarks today, stating the obvious:

"I don't know how a country in which there are soldiers who don't hold its nationality can be described other than as (being under) occupation," Prince Saud al-Faisal told reporters. He continued, "Did (Iraq) choose to have these forces? Had this been the case, it would have been a different matter. Any military intervention that is not at the request of the country concerned is the definition of occupation."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. ROFL
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. May I join you?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. H AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa my GAWD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think it means,
What you're doing there, asshole!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe the WH is giving SA a chance to parse words and get
out of saying what he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm guessing he means the same thing Wes Clark means
when he calls the war "illegitimate".

What I keep noticing is that pundits are mis-quoting the Saudi king, using the word "illegal"; he didn't say that, he said it was "illegitimate".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ceile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Clarification?
Don't like what someone says about us, so we'll just get a bunch of different translations and pick the one that we do like.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. BEST. THREAD. TITLE. EVER!
:rofl:

My G-d these people are STUPID. I am convinced that thunder is no longer the sound that angels are making whilst bowling, but G-d, Himself, smacking Himself in the head and saying: "Oy Gevalt!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Is that some kind of trick question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Is there anything Calvin and Hobbes CAN'T do?
I think not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. I wish the bush administration treated the Dems with that much respect
They're all kissy ass to the Arabs, but 50% of their own country gets a backhand.

This, my friends, is America under repervlikin occupation.

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Acadia Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. It is. And I bet he is suprised that the Saudis are concerned that he
might want to give then democracy and freedom like they did for Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. What part of
"illegitimate occupation" do these dipshits not understand?? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Acadia Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. They don't understand if it goes against their faith based beliefl.
They believed in the WMD's when everyone told them they were not there. They want to create reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Well they are SOL
Nobody except the last of the hard Koolaid drinkers are buying it anymore. SA nailed it with "illegitimate occupation".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. It all depends on what "is" is nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. of course,
they can't vouch for the precise translation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaplainM Donating Member (744 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. watch out
Can you be beheaded in Saudi Arabia for "clarification," the way you can for "criticism?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. "Or it depends what the word IS means"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC