Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The Healthy Americans Act" Senator Ron Wyden D-Ore

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 04:26 PM
Original message
"The Healthy Americans Act" Senator Ron Wyden D-Ore
---

Sounds kinda like the "Healthy Forests Act"...eh?

More mandatory public subsidization going to the very same corporations who brought us this health insurance mess in the first place.

Thanks Ron!
Thanks for fucking nothing!!

:grr:



"In addition to guaranteeing that every American can afford quality, private health insurance,..."

http://wyden.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=307848&%22?

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. This guy is completely clueless about healthcare.
He views it as affordable insurance and nothing more. You wouldn't need a "Healthy Americans Act" if private insurance companies hadn't been cherry picking for profit since the 1960's. They shouldn't be rewarded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Of course he's clueless. He's covered.
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't need insurance. I need health care. n/t
:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Single payer insurance can ensure you get health care
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I don't care too much how it gets done.
But I don't need insurance. I will celebrate when our government guarantees health care to all citizens (and I mean all, no exceptions, no effort on the part of citizens required other than showing up at the doctor). If it takes "insurance" to do that ... well, it could probably be done cheaper another way, but whatever.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. "it could probably be done cheaper another way, but whatever"
It really depends. Ok, here is the thing. Without insurance, the government would have to buy, purchase, regulate, and run every single health care facility in the nation (which would be a massive, insane investment and huge organization). And on top of that, the government would have to continue to pump the same amount of money into them to pay for the services.

With insurance, the government simply pays the facilities to do the work. They negotiate lower prices and set caps, as well as regulate. They cut down on the administrative paperwork. Yes, the facilities can be government run, and can be acquired/built as time goes by, but it requires a much smaller up front investment.

The first model is almost entirely unrealistic, to suggest absolute ownership and running of every facility (and ran at what efficiency?)? The second route just makes sure it gets paid for first off. With the amount of money it would take to own everything, that money may have a bigger social return elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Epic Fail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Your promotion of insurance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. So single-payer insurance is bad now? WTF?
Edited on Sat Apr-11-09 08:35 PM by Oregone
You people want the world, but you don't want to understand a single thing about it (yet make a practical and logistical compromise).

You realize if the government didn't go with an insurance plan it would have to purchase every fucking medical facility in the country? Do you realize how many small practitioners a single town has (some to the point of over-saturation)? Some clinics are doctor owned...you are going to force doctors to sell their practices and work for the government? Why would the government want every damn office in town anyway? You know how much extra overhead that creates? I just don't see how that is a sensible approach at all. It would be a nightmare running 20 facilities all separately in a small town, all providing the same services. I say, let em remain private, but restrict what they can charge by law. If they succeed, its best for everyone. If they wither, fuck em. And as a tangent...think of the billions spent on the initial acquisition of the facilities. Couldn't that be better spent on early education & intervention, and poverty programs (in the end, you just may have less people needing doctors).

BTW, Im currently on a government "insurance" program and quite happy. There are public hospitals and there are private ones (a few). There are mostly private small clinics and specialists. My health insurance card is accepted everywhere, no questions asked, and no bill in the mail. No pre-conditions will ever keep me from coverage. If you cant afford the premiums, the government subsidizes them. What the hell is wrong with this? Isn't that one hell of a great starting point?

Taking profit out of insurance and putting it to work for the good of the people can dramatically help a society. Hm...I wonder if Unemployment Insurance is bad to you too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Once again...
EPIC FAIL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Once again, why?
Edited on Sat Apr-11-09 11:09 PM by Oregone
Im seriously trying to discuss why a socialized single-payer health insurance approach is not the proper direction. Im not sure what warranted posts to be deleted. What is a viable alternative? If you can point me to one, I could begin considering its merit. In the meantime, I can observe single-payer programs being incredibly effective in various countries.

I don't think "Epic Fail" is a good start to an honest argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Strange. I thought Wyden was previously a single payer advocate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is exactly what I'd feared. A half-assed compromise that screws working class people.
He's my Senator. Dammit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wyden has been in D.C. far too long
One should also remind themselves that Wyden coss over and voted with Republicans on the Medicare Part D scam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Damn right he did!
I was furious and let him know. Did I get a response from my state's only Dem senator at the time? Hell no!

He lost my vote forever w/his idiotic vote on November 24, 2003.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. The guy sounds like a real Wydass.
:evilfrown:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yeah.. This is what he was pushing on The Ed Show this week...
And Ed didn't know enough about it to ask decent questions..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. How about a campaign to send all of these clowns a copy of Sicko?
From the President on down, they all need to see this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC