Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Integrity Now? What happened to Kucinich?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 03:29 PM
Original message
Integrity Now? What happened to Kucinich?
This Kucinich supporter seems a tad bit rude, but I have been wondering this myself? Does anyone know what happened with Dennis and Elizabeth's new site?




"Although it has been over a year, some may remember that as Kucinich dropped out of the presidential election prematurely because he was afraid of losing his congressional seat, he said he and his wife Elizabeth would be starting a new site for activists called "Integrity Now". This might have impressed Kucinich volunteers at the time, however absolutely nothing has been done toward that effort and the site domain has now returned to the SiteGround Default Server page."
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/04/13/18588405.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Most of his supporters are here on DU now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. okay, maybe we should organize here
but we don't have the email list that he does...

They just had a revolution in Moldova- facilitated by the use of Twitter...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe he just wants to have a normal life now ........
Married and all that. Maybe he's just tired. He's no kid, in spite of that bad dye job. He's 62 years old and, believe me, as you get older, you just don't have that same energy.

Who's his successor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. there could be something to that...
but Elizabeth is young, and Dennis is a very young 62, spunkier than any other Congressmen

That does raise a very important point though...why are our politicians mostly old guys with no energy to protect the Constitution, that don't even understand the latest technologies and what is happening in the lives of real Americans outside the beltway?


"Who's his successor?" Good Question!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. because instead of run for office
most politically active (or inactive) prefer to sit on the sidelines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. We need DUers to run for office!
We could help organize on the site here. Most people here seem to know a lot more about what is going on than those bastards in DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I think it's because people won't support term limits..
The lack of term limits is what causes the corrupt bastards, like Ted Stevens, to get entrenched in office...

Term limits would cut out 90% - 95% of the corruption going on now...


But that's just *my* opinion


Peace,

Ghost

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. term limits would help, I agree
and you don't need to tell me about Ted Stevens yikes! The republicans up here are pushing the idea that our new Senator Mark Begich should step down now because Stevens got off on a technicality. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Yeah, I've read about them wanting Begich to step down...
just goes to show just how stupid republicans are, doesn't it?

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Again ..............
Is this really necessary?

There are term limits already in place.

They're called "votes." And if you don't like how your representatives are behaving, you vote against them. If the majority disagrees with you, well, that's democracy at work.

The idea of some externally-imposed "term limit" - and who decides how long those terms should be, and why, and who has that power? - is absurd. I can't believe this keeps coming up.

Check out Ted Stevens. He learned about term limits, didn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Ted Stevens has been in so long because people like the pork he brings home
because he has been in there so long. His 'senority' and the money that brings is what people are voting for in this backward land of Republicans for government handouts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. And then they voted him out .........
which was my point, which you missed. They voted him out. His terms were finally limited.

The voters decide on term limits - no one else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. He was only effective at bringing home money
and he was in too long because of it. That was my point. He wouldn't be any more effective at bringing home bacon than anyone else if there were term limits. We wouldn't have a corrupt senoirity situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. That's his job -
his role is to bring home the bacon. He did a good job of it.

That's how it's always been. Maybe it's not the best system, but it sure as hell beats anything that I've ever seen suggested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. His job is to bring home bacon? I thought it was something about defending our Constitution
I guess we all look for different things in a Congressman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. That, too ............
His job has many facets. I, too, took an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution when I was sworn in before the various bars, but I had other duties as well.

He was a Senator, actually, and now you've learned a lot more, haven't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I know he was a Senator!
Edited on Mon Apr-13-09 08:25 PM by Fireweed247
I call them Senators(from the Senate) and Representatives(from the House) but when I talk in general about all of them, I call them Congressmen. :eyes:

(on edit: you might notice from a previous post I know he was a Senator)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. "Congressman" is a term reserved for members of
the House of Representatives. While your appellation is technically correct, its usage is so arcane as to be interpreted incorrectly. When you refer to members of both Houses, you would use the word "representatives" or "members of Congress."

You would never address a Senator as "Congressman Stevens," so referring to him that way in another context just blots out your message and makes you look ill-informed .......................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Calling a senator a representative is even more incorrect.
Stop your bloviating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. They're all representatives, elected, no less,
but the difference is that some are members of the House of Representatives.

Stay with the concept, and eventually - I believe in you - it will be revealed and comprehended.

Don't quit now. You have so much waiting for you in your journey towards enlightenment. I am happy for you......................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Sorry, but votes *do not* equal 'term limits'...
.. it's silly to even suggest that. Term limits would inspire those who really desire to do some good to act quickly and get something done.

People who come in and do some good should have no problem getting a job in the private sector once their terms are up...

Our government is *supposed* to be "of the people, by the people, for the people", is it not? After a while, politicians quit being "the people" and become simply "politicians", serving their own best interests at the peril of We, the People...


"Check out Ted Stevens. He learned about term limits, didn't he?"

:rofl: .... yeah, 40 years later... and *we* will be paying him for as long as he's alive...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. especially with our voting systems
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. So you don't think Kucinich belongs in Congress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Elizabeth is only his spouse,
without his experience and expertise. And, besides, doesn't she have her own life?

Listen, Kucinich knows that Obama's there for eight years, most likely, and that means he can settle in now to be the best Congressman he can be for his constituents, or he can retire and do something else - teach, establish some kind of training academy for people coming up.

Because, yes, that was a very pointed question I asked: who is Kucinich's successor? And the answer comes back as a hollow echo. There's no one.

A fatal flaw for the things Kucinich espoused. He still has time to remedy that.............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. "establish some kind of training academy"
That is a great idea. He could also do that on a website in a way, and reach more people with today's technology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. In my experience, the best lawyers
were the ones who made sure, as my greatest teacher told me, "if I drop dead in the middle of examining a witness, my first chair will step over my body and continue the examination."

I did it, and passed the lesson along. Stand-alone heroes who don't leave a replacement aren't very heroic, as I see it.............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. DK grandstanding and then not backing up his talk with results?
I'm surprised. Really, I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
24. so disorganized
This drove many of us to distraction in the last two campaigns - things were always so disorganized in the Kucinich camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. What does that say about how he would perform as President?
If he can't run an organized presidential campaign, what makes people think that he could run the executive branch of the government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
28. He was ready to set up and fund a new site, but...
Edited on Mon Apr-13-09 11:18 PM by MilesColtrane
...he's a little short.

Ba-Ba-Boom!!

But, seriously folks....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
29. You could email him and ask him.
:shrug:

Just a crazy idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. maybe i'll try that
do you have his email address?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. this is all I have
http://kucinich.house.gov/Contact/Starter.htm

You might try PMing DUer davidswanson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC