"And his conflicted claims about absentee ballots? Well, read on — because Coleman has vowed to continue fighting on that front. His entire case was dismissed ‘with prejudice,’ and Coleman was ordered to pay Franken's and the court's costs for the entire trial as well as Franken's costs and attorneys fees for three days' delay caused by Coleman attorneys' errors.
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/04/14/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry4943399.shtml“In an interview earlier in the day, Coleman said he believes ‘thousands’ of rejected votes should have been counted. Coleman legal spokesman Ben Ginsberg said the ruling denies many valid votes by applying a stricter standard to determining eligible ballots than local officials applied during the recount. ...
"But experts who read the panel's 68-page ruling say it effectively attacks some of the very arguments that Coleman would use on appeal. ... The judges said Coleman, trailing Franken by 225-votes after the recount, wanted the panel to ignore Minnesota election law and adopt a more lenient standard allowing illegal absentee ballots to be counted. The panel was blunt in how it dismissed Coleman claims. A cornerstone of his case was the argument that the judges should count absentee ballots they had deemed illegal during the trial because similar ones had been accepted on Election Day and during the recount.”