Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who else believes that Bushco was wiretapping

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:34 PM
Original message
Who else believes that Bushco was wiretapping
Edited on Thu Apr-16-09 07:41 PM by malaise
all Members of Congress. Bushco was Nixon on steroids.
They must be punished.

Risen said they tried to wiretap a Member of Congress.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/16/us/16nsa.html?_r=1&em
<snip>
The National Security Agency intercepted private e-mail messages and phone calls of Americans in recent months on a scale that went beyond the broad legal limits established by Congress last year, government officials said in recent interviews.

Several intelligence officials, as well as lawyers briefed about the matter, said the N.S.A. had been engaged in “overcollection” of domestic communications of Americans. They described the practice as significant and systemic, although one official said it was believed to have been unintentional.

add
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep
That was the sole reason, no question. That's why so many have gone along with the bullshit, because BushCo has something on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Of course they were.
And they were likely blackmailing members of congress. It's what they do.

The Bush family has used that tactic before, apparently....I believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. yep, including the current President.....especially the current President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kerry... Kucinich... Feingold... all good candidates for a tapping.
George W. Bush was an un-American, Constitution-hating, traitorous FUCK.

I hope someday we'll get the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Don't forget Wellstone, early on, I bet. I don't believe they'd wait
for the paperwork if they really wanted to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. I agree with you - but I don't think they'll be punished
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. sadly maybe they won't be but if we the people start questioning
these last horrible 8 years maybe something could be done, or am I being too hopeful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. I believed that from the moment I learned about the wiretapping.
And the strong-arming & bribery that probably happened as a result of it would explain the Democrats' refusal to do anything about the Bush misadministration.

Only those senators who stood up had no skeletons in their closets, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. oh yes indeed, didn't Rockefeller say at one time he thought he
was being wiretapped also?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Yep
I remember that well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. I have always assumed I was being listened to, since the 1970s.
Assuming anyone cared enough to listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. Of course they were......
why do you think it has stopped?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. So was the reason blackmail
or something else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. actually I think the reason wire tapping
to control someone could work, is lack of knowledge or ability to have perspective by average voters in the population.

If one joke, or bad thing, can be used to smear people, it requires a group that will judge the person based on that alone. Sometimes you even see reports of comments from hearsay used to define people. The ability for people too believe it defines the whole character of a person, is one of the faults of society. In a healthy society, such things only work when it supports an already held belief, so only works if it was a small part of a larger evaluation of character. If it was a pattern of behavior and truly defining, then it has meaning.

However, the wiretapping alone is not the problem, it is that it can be used as a weapon, and who holds that weapon that is the problem. Quite simply the group that has control over that information could gain more power then deserved through intimidation. But the push back is to prosecute those that allowed it to happen, or for people, since many people have access to the system, to share its misuses to the population.

In theory if the information is meant to protect people from violence and corruption, then a use of such information for political gain, would be struck down by the vary people that have the information, for using such things for politics(like the J Edgar Hoover files were said to do) for using it for politics lowers the integrity of groups that defend for sake of justice. For example, J Edgar had some successes with his info, but lowered the respect of the organization by his tactics.

The reason wire tapping is wrong, without court order, is because of how easy it can be missued. But if it can not be removed, then the only solution would be to make information on everyone available to everyone. This removes secrecy. However it shifts the problem of information outside of perspective being gathered, to who has the megaphone to spread that information. Just making it a new problem of information flow and learning of the population.

Imagine if everything a person ever said could be mined for one sentence, then the entire person is defined by that sentence. (Rev Wright is a good example of this happening). But the knowledge that that is being done changes it to the smearer looking bad. As people realize what is being done.

The people that use gossip and smear for self gain, do something without integrity or honor, and in that, the gain of some believing it, is far less then the loss of even more that realize the wrong that was done, and in the end leads to the demise of those that used those tactics. Which is interesting also.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. Here. There. Everywhere!
Edited on Thu Apr-16-09 08:34 PM by Double T
We've ALL got files :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
16. It has already been confirmed that the NSA wiretapped Colin Powell
It's pretty obvious that Bush had the entire DC elite under surveillance. I've posted several times about the story, published in the Guardian, that Bolton got NSA wiretaps of Powell which he fed to Rumsfeld and Cheney in order to undercut Powell's efforts at diplomacy on Iran and North Korea.

The Wall St. Journal reported when Spitzer went down that Spitz was caught in a web of almost complete surveillance of elected local officials by the Bush DOJ.

It's an open secret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. And now Harmon
Ah well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
18. Yes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
19. Blackmail would explain a lot...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
20. No doubt in my mind. Why wouldn't they? Who would stop them?
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC