Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Arlen Specter Is Ignorant Or Lying About Employee Free Choice Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 08:02 AM
Original message
Senator Arlen Specter Is Ignorant Or Lying About Employee Free Choice Act

http://www.laborradio.org/node/10933

By Doug Cunningham

On the Employee Free Choice Act labor law reform Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter is either ignorant or he’s lying when he says.

: “I could not support it when it eliminated the secret ballot. If they get a fifty percent plus one the union is recognized and there is not the current procedure of having a secret ballot election."

Specter is dead wrong. The National Labor Relations Act says when 30 percent of workers file with the board, an election shall be called. When the workers decide to file. If the Employee Free Choice Act passes workers could still do that. What changes is that workers could choose instead to get 50 percent plus one to sign union cards and then the employer would be required by the law to respect the workers choice to form a union. Senator Arlen Specter is either ignorant or lying when he says this about the Employee Free Choice Act.

: “The choice act has an entirely new procedure where you collect cards."

Specter is dead wrong again. Union cards aren’t newly created by this reform. They’re used under current law – but only if the employer chooses to allow them. The Employee Free Choice lets workers choose to use union cards to organize unions.

It may be possible Specter isn’t lying OR ignorant here. Maybe he's just singing the tune paid for by more than $230,000 in campaign cash from the union busting law firm Blank Rome LLP.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Arlen Sphincter is a Republican. Therefore he's lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. He is playing to the GOP base.
Look for a lot of that from him. There's a chance he might not get the GOP nomination in his bid for re-election in the midterms and that's where he's coming from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. At this stage I don't expect it to pass anyway
Business is still far more powerful than Unions when it comes to Congress. Congress is fueled by money and power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. 'Yes' to both.
He is now, and has always been nothing more than a useful tool to keep one Republican vote in the Senate.

He panders to the middle when allowed to on votes that the Republics know that they'll lose and are therefore meaningless, but whenever push comes to shove, he scurries back to his monied master's feet and heels like the good dog that he is.

And there are Democrats that 'respect' his individuality.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's not "respect" so much as it is that they know they can "get" him on some issues.
And half a loaf is better than none.

He'd be a tough (read: EXPENSIVE) one to unseat. That's why they cut their losses, spend their money where they think it will produce more bang for the buck, work with him in the interim, and bide their time until he retires.

It's a cost-benefit analysis. There's no mendacity behind it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yeah, I know, but Specter irritates the hell out of me.
He seems to be a man with no convictions whatsoever outside of whatever is politically expedient and self-serving at the same time.

Pennsylvania deserves better.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. He does me, too. Everytime you think he has a brain in his head, he disappoints.
He'll roll along, saying the "right" things about this issue and that, and then do a one-eighty and act like an ass.

PA does deserve better, you're right about that too. He's just entrenched, though--it'll be tough to pry him loose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech3149 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I used to try and defend him as at least being reasonable
but watching his votes and statements more closely revealed one thing that encompasses his career. It's all about Arlen. He'll do anything or say anything he sees as perpetuating or furthering his career. I just hope the state Dem party doesn't kneecap a good candidate like Pennacchio for some pink tutu Dem to run against Toomey. Specter has to know he's done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. that's what republick party people do -- lie. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. These are not mutually exclusive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. Whatever Specter might be, he is not ignorant. He is a republican
down to his shoes, going back to his service on the Warren Commission. He has made a lot of money from PACs and is one of the best senators money can buy.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. OMG ...a senator who is ignorant or lying? Who da thunk it?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC