Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Torturers’ Logic Fails “Holy F*ck” Test

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 07:33 PM
Original message
Torturers’ Logic Fails “Holy F*ck” Test
Edited on Sat Apr-18-09 07:37 PM by kpete
Torturers’ Logic Fails “Holy F*ck” Test
By: Spencer Ackerman Saturday April 18, 2009 5:02 pm

Greg Sargent makes a great point about the torture memos:
http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/torture/former-bushies-claim-that-obama-revealed-torture-secrets-is-largely-bogus/

What was actually revealed in yesterday’s memos was the nature of the Bush administration’s efforts to legalize and justify the “harsh interrogation techniques” that we mostly knew about already. And it’s not terribly difficult to imagine why some folks would want those legal efforts kept under wraps.

That's apropos of the chorus of Bush officials -- see this Politico piece, http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0409/21338.html for instance; or this Michael Mukasey/Mike Hayden op-ed -- http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0409/21338.html who are saying that Obama irresponsibly revealed CIA torture techniques. He revealed them, in all likelihood, because he's forsworn them, and to move on. As Greg says, we knew most of this stuff had happened. (Obama noted the same thing yesterday.) What really rankles these people is that their ability to harmonize putting someone in a "confinement box" with insects with statutes and treaties that expressly forbid torture is now entirely on display.

Let's put it another way. One thing that the August 1, 2002 Yoo/Bybee torture memo -- the one released in 2004 -- focuses on is the alleged difficulty of defining what interrogation procedures would "shock the conscience" of a reasonable individual, since that standard is rather salient when it comes to the federal anti-torture statute. By taking a deliberately agnostic stance on the prospect of ever finding such a consensus around "reasonableness" -- hey, it's a wide world out there, what shocks me might not shock you, so who's to say -- you wind up with absurdities like rubber-stamping as humane our confinement box of insects. As it happens, when a conservative friend of mine read that the Justice Department had blessed putting people in a confinement box of insects, he IM'd me to say "Holy Fuck." Miracle of miracles: putting someone in a confinement box of insects makes people say Holy Fuck. We have our reasonable-individual standard reaction.

Indeed, the only person who doesn't mind putting someone in an enclosed space with insects is Buffalo Bill from "The Silence of the Lambs." The memos reveal that for a long time, the government of the United States adopted his moral standards. If you had been guided by that legal reasoning, you'd do whatever was in your power to keep it from the public, since you know what they'll say. Holy Fuck.


http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/04/17/you-gotta-keep-it-confidential/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. The fact that he even has to say this stuff is disturbing
We actually have to defend the position of not wanting to torture. Bush and his crony's have really done a number on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. US to world: It puts the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again
seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. You have such a way with words. K & R. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC