Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Asked to Stop 'False Information' on Medical Pot

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:07 PM
Original message
U.S. Asked to Stop 'False Information' on Medical Pot
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-medical-marijuana15-2009apr15,0,6135178.story

U.S. asked to stop 'false information' on medical pot

Advocacy group tells the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that the government needs to update the official view of marijuana to reflect its use as a pain reliever.
By Carol J. Williams and Maura Dolan
8:07 PM PDT, April 14, 2009

Reporting from San Francisco and Los Angeles -- Citing "overwhelming" evidence that marijuana eases pain and anxiety for the chronically ill, medicinal pot advocates told a federal appeals panel Tuesday that the federal government should be stopped from spreading "false information" about marijuana.

As was argued in the debate over whether stem cell research should be resumed, Americans for Safe Access cast the Bush administration's opposition to any legalized use of marijuana as being shaped by conservative sentiments instead of hard facts.

President Obama has signaled to Cabinet members that science should be guiding government judgments in controversial matters of medicine and technology, not the prevailing political mood. On Tuesday, however, a government lawyer told three judges of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that the administration wasn't required to explain or retract its statements that marijuana "has no currently accepted medical use."

Marijuana is banned under federal law but is legal for cancer patients and others suffering chronic illnesses in California and a dozen other states. Safe Access sued the federal government under a law that prohibits it from disseminating inaccurate information...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. They need to stop the 'false information' on ALL pot.
If I listed every federally funded stupid anti-drug ad with misinformation galore that I've ever seen...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I'm against medical marijuana legalization with a prescription
I am very pro ALL marijuana legalization. I'm a big boy I can handle it.

Medical marijuana is a half assed attempt at legalization
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Totally agreed.
n.t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. When you ask for "All or Nothing"...
get ready to take nothing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. ,
Edited on Mon Apr-20-09 12:24 PM by lame54
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. But, But, without all the false information, how will they justify the prohibition??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backtoblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. False information?
No freakin way, not OUR government!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. What I was thinking too
If the ruling is against the gov't I can see someone picking up the phone, being informed of the judgment then asking to put the person on speaker so the rest of the staff can hear it and all have a good laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. If we arent capable of chosing what to put in or do with or bodies..
then how are we capable of electing reprsentatives or choosing a career. Why can I choose to drink myself to death or smoke cigarettes until I develop cancer. But no the govt says this peaceful natural herb is illegal because its dangerous. Please, give me freedom of choice on all matters person and political, moral and spiritual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC