Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The embarrassment of American broadband

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:58 PM
Original message
The embarrassment of American broadband
The Internet was born and and raised in the United States. Yet—thanks to slow speeds, inconsistent availability, and bandwidth caps—we now lag the rest of the world when it comes to broadband Net access.

According to Point Topic (a UK-based market-research company), there were 79 million broadband subscribers in the U.S. at the end of 2008—that’s 19 percent of the world’s total, second only to China’s 83 million. (The report defines broadband as anything faster than 256Kbps.) However, at roughly 26 percent, the U.S. ranked 22nd out of 113 countries in terms of broadband penetration by population.

And in a separate study, the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) recently estimated that (as of June 2008) 25 percent of the U.S. population had broadband access, ranking the U.S. 15th out of the OECD’s 30 member countries.

To be fair, the U.S. has a population of more than 300 million spread out over more than 3.5 million square miles. That’s a lot of people and a lot of space to cover. But it’s pathetic that roughly three-quarters of the people in this country don’t have broadband Internet service.

http://www.macworld.com/article/140109/2009/04/broadband_embarrassment.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. To be fair
Only the top 1% actually NEED broadband; the peasants can be satisfied with dial-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The Peasants in rural areas are lucky to have electricity. Thank-you FDR
If it wasn't for FDR we'd be looking at wind-powered battery backed up low voltage in rural America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Either that or holes drilled in the roof for pop bottle lights
the way they do it in shantytown Brazil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. A link to that? We may need them in our rural survivor kits...
I'm not aware of what those would be.

Everyone around my farm expects regular outages during thunderstorm season. We've all got back-up kerosene or oil lamps bcaking up our gasoline powered generators.

Very few of the old farmstead windmills turn anymore and no one I know has a bank of batteries as would have existed back in the 1930's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Here ya go
Edited on Mon Apr-20-09 02:37 PM by Warpy
http://www.videosift.com/video/DIY-lights-from-2-liter-soda-bottles-with-NO-electricity

There are also a couple of other good hacks at the site, well worth exploring.

I love this stuff.

Actually, your survival kit should include one of these: http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=petzl+headlamp&x=0&y=0

They're also great for rummaging in cabinets and closets and fixing the puter. It's one of those things you didn't know you needed until you got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. tnx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. 2 liter bottles as skylights filled with water to scatter light to the sides is a clever idea.
I'll put that in the things I learned to day file.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnutbutr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. I live within about a mile of fios and cable lines on the main road
but can get neither. The road I live on does not meet the house per mile requirement to run lines down it and never will with the zoning restrictions of my county in place. That's fine, I like my privacy and the open country. What is really pissing me off is the county has requested stimulus money for broadband expansion in the county and will be planning to spend it on stupid ass radio towers that a half assed company has setup to provide LINE OF SIGHT service in the f'ing mountains. Since it's line of sight it would require tons of towers to meet the line of sight and distance restrictions. Even then, the proposal from the company would still not be able to provide service to about 25% of the county residents.

Maybe I'll win the lottery, run fiber througout the county and start my own ISP then charge verizon to use my lines. (I wish there were a maniacal laugh smilie)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Similar situation for me
I'm about 5km too far away for DSL, no cable and just on the fringe zone for a wireless system.

Satellite is too expensive and I don't like the idea of the latency delay.

So, I use a combination of dialup and the modem in my cell phone (5X faster than dialup).

What pisses me off is that I can get a semi-fast connection with this jerry-rigged cell phone, but the same company (Rogers) WON'T offer me a broadband connection from the telecom antenna towers that I can see from out my window.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Are you sure you can't get wireless broadband from Rogers?
Edited on Mon Apr-20-09 06:18 PM by Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Thanks for the links
But they're still no solution for me. I live in a rural area about 40 miles from Ottawa.

And I'm already doing "tethering" with my Nokia phone at about 64 KBps.

What I want is a 256+ home-based system. I'd love the "experimental" system like they have in the "Golden Horseshoe" (Toronto to Niagara Falls) area.

But nobody's offering it to ME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. My house moved itself...
And is now too far away from the main junction... that is the excuse I'm getting for why I used to get really fast service and now, I don't. I'm too far away. My address didn't change, but now, I'm mysteriously too far away.

Ain't technology grand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. What did you expect with the corporations running the show??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. The problem is huge pseudo-monopolies with no competition.
In this area, you have exactly two choices for reasonable internet access. Qwest DSL or Comca$t Cable. Both suck. Comca$t sucks slightly less and doesn't require a ridiculous deposit to get it installed. There are no other cable companies or DSL providers in the region (apart from a couple old broadband companies that are trying desperately to hold on and rebrand the qwest DSL as their own product and charge even more for the shitty service.)

Because they have no competition, they have no pressure to make their service better. And so they don't. The only reason Comca$t supposedly "doubled" their speed recently (still haven't noticed any difference yet here) is because on a national level, they have to compete with FIOS in some markets. Not here, unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC