Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harman responds to CQ: Report ‘recycles three year-old descredited reporting.’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 02:11 PM
Original message
Harman responds to CQ: Report ‘recycles three year-old descredited reporting.’
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/04/20/harman-respons-cq/

Harman responds to CQ: Report ‘recycles three year-old descredited reporting.’


Rep. Jane Harman’s (D-CA) office issued a statement this afternoon responding to a story by CQ’s Jeff Stein, which reports that the NSA caught Harman offering a quid pro quo to unnamed Israeli agents in return for their help in becoming House Intelligence Committee chair. The report also said that then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales stopped an FBI investigation into Harman’s quid pro quo deal because he needed her help to sell the Bush administration’s warrantless wiretapping program. Harman’s statement denies the report and deflects blame onto the Bush administration for wiretapping a Member of Congress:

The CQ Politics story simply recycles three year-old discredited reporting of largely unsourced material to manufacture a ’scoop’ out of widely known and unremarkable facts – that Congresswoman Jane Harman is and has long been a supporter of AIPAC, and that some members of AIPAC regarded her as well-qualified to chair the House Intelligence Committee following the 2006 elections. Congresswoman Harman has never contacted the Justice Department about its prosecution of present or former AIPAC employees and the Department has never informed her that she was or is the subject of or involved in an investigation. If there is anything about this story that should arouse concern, it is that the Bush Administration may have been engaged in electronic surveillance of members of the congressional Intelligence Committees.


Harman’s statement appears not to have fully addressed the issue regarding Gonzales, simply stating that the Department of Justice “has never informed her that she was or is the subject of or involved in an investigation.” This, of course, leaves open the possibility that an official from another executive department or a member of Congress told her of the case.

Update: Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington is calling for Congress and the Justice Department to launch an investigation into Harman's activities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. But we WANNA believe it!
--d!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can you say Scramble Mode....
I knew you could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hmmm, that comes across as a non-denial denial to me...
"... largely unsourced material to manufacture a ’scoop’ out of widely known and unremarkable facts." There really is nothing in that statement that clearly and categorically refutes the story, imo.

It will be interesting to see if this 'has legs' or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Harman has never contacted the Justice Department.." but did Gonzo contact her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Harman is one of the biggest AIPAC whores ever and I do not trust her one bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. sleazeballs of her caliber are dime a dozen in dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. So is she saying that had she known she was being wiretapped
she never would have done anything illegal? That because she got nailed by an illegal wiretap that she is innocent? Kick her lame ass to the curb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. CREW needs to call for war crimes prosecution of Bush officials
Why is this the first peep out of them since the torture memos were released?

Sometimes I think people are throwing up smoke screens.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC