Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Report: Harsh Interrogation Tactics Used To Find Iraq-al Qaida Link

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 02:33 AM
Original message
Senate Report: Harsh Interrogation Tactics Used To Find Iraq-al Qaida Link
Huffington Post
04/22/09 02:24 AM


A report released Tuesday by the Senate Armed Services Committee presented new details regarding Bush administration officials' approval of the military's use of harsh interrogation techniques on terrorism suspects. The 232-page, newly declassified report was approved by the Armed Services Committee on November 20, 2008, and had since then been under review at the Department of Defense for declassification.

A former U.S. Army psychiatrist, Maj. Charles Burney, told Army investigators in 2006 that interrogators at the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, detention facility were under "pressure" to produce evidence of ties between al Qaida and Iraq.

"While we were there a large part of the time we were focused on trying to establish a link between al Qaida and Iraq and we were not successful in establishing a link between al Qaida and Iraq," Burney told staff of the Army Inspector General. "The more frustrated people got in not being able to establish that link . . . there was more and more pressure to resort to measures that might produce more immediate results."

As for the impact of the report, the Washington Post notes that "the new findings are expected to add further pressure on the White House to authorize an independent investigation of the Bush-era interrogation policies." Earlier in the day Tuesday President Obama said he was open to the possible prosecution of Bush administration officials.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/21/report-harsh-interrogatio_n_189817.html

Drip, drip, drip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let's see now...
Zelikow admits (and proof exists) that he warned the Bush administration about his opinion that the legal basis for torture was unsound.

Despite this, the Bush administration opted for a legal decision that would allow them to bring maximum pressure to bear on individuals, with the stated goal (by Maj. Burney) of eliciting a specific, pre-determined conclusion about a relationship between Iraq and al-Qaida, in order to justify an attack and occupation of Iraq.

I think there must be people on both sides of the aisle beginning to sweat bullets...especially after Zelikow's suggestion to de-politicize the situation,let DOJ do it's job,and let the chips fall where they may.

Drip, drip, drip, indeed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nostradammit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Headline should be: Torture Used to Elicit False Information for U.S. Propaganda
"Harsh Interrogation Tactics" is the most vile euphemism since "collateral damage."

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I guess we shouldn't be surprised - they were going to stop at nothing
to have their war in Iraq.

And your headline sums it up so disgustingly well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC