Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The BIGGEST lie in US industrial history"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 12:00 PM
Original message
"The BIGGEST lie in US industrial history"


http://www.freepress.org/columns/display/7/2009/1740


How Chernobyl could happen here

-snip-

The BIGGEST lie in US industrial history is that “nobody died at Three Mile Island.” Just before last month’s thirtieth anniversary of the central Pennsylvania melt down, critical new evidence was completely ignored by the corporate media.

Nuclear engineer Arnie Gundersen, a former industry executive, reported in Harrisburg that new findings show far more radiation may have been released than previously estimated. Epidemiologist Stephen Wing of the University of North Carolina joined in a study indicating human health was indeed compromised downwind.

To this day neither TMI’s owners nor the Nuclear Regulatory Commission knows how much radiation escaped, where it went or whom it impacted. The Gundersen/Wing findings cast new light on the question of building more reactors.

But they got a Stalinesque blackout from ALL corporate media, which parroted the official lie that "nobody was harmed" at the 1979 disaster.

This week comes official Radioactive Lie #2: “Chernobyl can’t happen here.”

-snip-

On October 5, 1966, the Fermi I fast breeder reactor nearly delivered a far worse explosion. Cooled by highly volatile liquid sodium, it teetered for a month on the brink of a radioactive eruption that could have cratered much of southeastern Michigan and permanently destroyed the biggest fresh water bodies on Earth. The accident was kept under Soviet-style wraps for years.

When TMI melted a potentially explosive hydrogen bubble formed inside the dome. Officials denied there was a melt-down (there was) but were privately terrified the trapped gas could rupture the containment. The escaping cloud would have contaminated millions along the east coast from Boston to Washington.

Chernobyl's cloud blanketed Europe with deadly isotopes. Some came down in California within ten days, killing countless birds and possibly, in the long run, even more people. The radiation then crossed the entire northern United States, contaminating milk in New England. It returned later for a second pass.

-snip-

The tidal wave of cancers, miscarriages, sterility and worse that still washes over the Ukraine and surrounding regions gets ever more horrifying as time passes. Because Chernobyl 4 was a new “state of the art” unit, its core spewed far less radiation than might come from older reactors at Indian Point, New York, or Oyster Creek, New Jersey, which has just been re-licensed to run twenty years beyond its original design specifications.

-snip-

Small wonder the reactor industry cannot get private financing or insurance and has no place to go with its radioactive waste. Or why its pushers are yet again demanding $50 billion in loan guarantees for new reactor construction, and still more to perpetrate the myth that nuclear fuel can be reprocessed (to help stop this madness, see www.beyondnuclear.org, www.nirs.org and www.nukefree.org).

Chernobyl remains history's worst human-made disaster. Something slightly different but even worse could be happening as you read this. Building new reactors, and keeping old ones running, will guarantee it.

The only containment strong enough to make atomic energy truly safe is the political power YOU exert. Chernobyl “can’t happen here” only if the reactors are turned off before they kill again.
----------------------------

no new nuke plants, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Jeeze, there have been so many
how can you just call one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. The problem with these reactors is that they have to be located near large bodies of water.
Chernobyl couldn't happen here though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. why not?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. The Chernobyl reactor was a catastrophe waiting to happen.
An incredibly bad design that would send any sane engineer fleeing into the hills. It didn't even have a proper containment building.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. It may be the second biggest lie..........
...the first being U.S. industries pay more taxes than anyone else in the world. The rate may be the highest, but with loopholes, most pay little or none!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Or that cigarettes were harmless
or even beneficial for you.

Or anything about asbestos, plastics, oil, gas, shale, or industrial farming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Now if this article contained anything resembling facts...
... then it might be credible. But since it doesn't, it can only be class one fearmongering, lying, propaganda for the coal industry, and in general an atrocity against science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You're accusing a nuclear engineer and an epidemiologist at a leading institution of lying.
Do you have any facts to support your statement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. For starters...
If Arnie Gundersen has any credentials other than being a professional anti-nuclear spokesperson, then it's not evident from the public record. Second, this article is loaded up with scare phrases, hyperbole, and misinformation, without citing studies, cases, or any kind of real science. Actual scientific studies, however, have found that no, there wasn't any real human health toll from TMI, as determined by seperate studies from the Pennsylvania Department of Health, the Kemeny Commission, Maureen Hatch, and Stephen Wing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Mile_Island_accident#Health_effects_and_epidemiology
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Ok, you don't like the tone of the article. I can give you that.
I read the main thesis of the article to be that existing nuclear reactors in the U.S. are vulnerable to disastrous accidents. I think that's the truth. I've heard other nuclear physicists tell me this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC