Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Love This Headline: Condoleezza Rice Gave Nod For 'Torture' Techniques

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 08:47 AM
Original message
Love This Headline: Condoleezza Rice Gave Nod For 'Torture' Techniques
Source: Times Online

A Senate Intelligence Committee document has revealed that Condoleezza Rice personally approved the CIA’s use of waterboarding on al-Qaeda suspects.

The new narrative provides the most detailed timeline yet of the conception and top-level approval of the violent “enhanced interrogation” techniques employed by American officials.

The report describes a meeting between then-CIA Director George Tenet and Dr Rice in July 2002. The Secretary of State "advised that the CIA could proceed with its proposed interrogation" of alleged al-Qaeda terrorist Abu Zubaydah, the report said.

In 2003, the CIA briefed Dr Rice, Dick Cheney and John Ashcroft, the Attorney General, on the use of waterboarding and other methods including week-long sleep deprivation, forced nudity and the use of stress positions. The Senate report says that officials "reaffirmed that the CIA program was lawful and reflected administration policy".

CIA memos released by President Obama's administration last week revealed that Mr Zubaydah was waterboarded at least 83 times in the course of a month, and Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, who claimed to have planned the September 11 attacks, 183 times.

The new timeline shows that Dr Rice played a greater role in the acceptance of harsh interrogation techniques than she admitted last autumn in written testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee.

The narrative also shows that dissenting legal views about the severe interrogation methods were repeatedly brushed aside.


The Intelligence Committee’s timeline comes a day after the Senate Armed Services Committee released an exhaustive report detailing direct links between the CIA’s harsh interrogation programme and abuses of prisoners at the US prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in Afghanistan and at Iraq’s Abu Ghraib prison.

Last Autumn, Dr Rice acknowledged to the Senate Armed Services Committee only that she had attended meetings where the CIA interrogation request was discussed, and asked for the attorney general to conduct a legal review. She said that she did not recall the details. Dr Rice omitted her direct role in approving the programme in her written statement to the committee.

more: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6154255.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Conndoleezza 'Any Means to an End' Rice from now on. More evidence: anything to get the war on.
Any method to get 'intel' to connect al-Qaeda to Iraq, up to and including war crimes, eh, Dr. (Strange)Rice?

LIHOP/MIHOP looking less tin-foil-y all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, I'm sure Condi was the mastermind behind it all.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. No, but we are getting closer.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. My snark wasn't directed at you, BTW, but at the obvious direction
the blame (shit) will roll--always downhill. My impression is that Condi didn't know what she was doing in her NSA role, and just greenlighted the agenda provided her. Not that that makes her immune from culpability, but really...does anyone think she had anything on her mind at the time other than pleasing her "husband"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
predfan Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. One wonders if that was the only time Condi "gave nod" in the WH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC