Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

While the topic is so hot "Close Torture Loopholes in the Army Field Manual"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 09:11 AM
Original message
While the topic is so hot "Close Torture Loopholes in the Army Field Manual"
Pleae read this at the Center for Constitutional Rights website.

Close Torture Loopholes in the Army Field Manual
Synopsis


President Obama's three executive orders of January 22, 2009 call for the closing of Guantanamo within one year, the closing of secret CIA 'black sites,' and the limiting of interrogation techniques to those allowed in the Army Field Manual (AFM). Join us to close torture loopholes that remain.
Description

President Obama's three executive orders of January 22, 2009 call for the closing of Guantanamo within one year, the closing of secret CIA 'black sites,' and the limiting of interrogation techniques to those allowed in the Army Field Manual (AFM), eliminating the numerous executive orders and opinions issued during the Bush administration that granted official approval for torture, cruel and inhuman treatment, and abuse. These executive orders certainly represent an extraordinary step forward, but we remain concerned about potentially exploitable loopholes. Please take a moment to ask him to close the loopholes.

~snip~

Appendix M of the Army Field Manual - a new section introduced in 2006, applicable only to "unlawful combatants," the category applied to detainees in Guantanamo, at secret CIA prisons, and elsewhere - allows the use of techniques such as prolonged isolation, sleep deprivation, sensory deprivation, and inducing fear and humiliation of prisoners. These techniques, especially when used in combination as permitted by the AFM, constitute cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, and in some cases, torture. These techniques have caused documented, long-lasting psychological and physical harm and were condemned by a bipartisan congressional report released last month, as well as by the Bush-appointed head of the military commissions at Guantanamo.

Much like John Yoo's infamous "torture memos" at the Office of Legal Counsel attempted to provide a legal cover for the authorization of torture by high-ranking Bush administration officials, the addition of Appendix M attempts to provide the same cover, utilizing the Army Field Manual. President Obama's executive order repudiates Yoo's memos - but it is not sufficient to do so without also repudiating this appendix, drafted in light of those memos.

The rewritten 2006 AFM also included other problematic changes - allowing U.S. interrogators to pretend to be from another country, or to pretend the prisoner is located in another country (including countries known for torture and abuse), and allowing interrogators to use "Fear Up," a procedure designed to psychologically exploit prisoners' existing fears - and supplemented to allow interrogators to induce "new fears" in prisoners.

President Obama's executive order created a task force that has six months to examine whether to create "additional or different guidance" for agencies such as the CIA, outside the U.S. military - a potential escape hatch for a return to CIA "enhanced interrogations" and torture.

Please join us today to ask President Obama to reaffirm that his executive order will not provide a loophole for the CIA to return to torture and illegality, and to ensure that Army Field Manual lives up to the standards it is expected to set by revoking Appendix M and other sections of the AFM that could allow torture, abuse, and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment to continue. It is important that this review be conducted transparently, and with the open consultation of human rights groups. For too long, secrecy has ruled the day and protected torture and abuse.

More at http://ccrjustice.org/get-involved/action/close-torture-loopholes-army-field-manual


Link to page where you can add your signature to the request that the loophole be closed.
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/383/t/4089/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=26522






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is pretty important
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. absolutely!! thanks and K&R!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The loophole has to be closed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Without a doubt merh..we have to stay on top of this!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. k&r
No one should be allowed to get away with this kind of behavior.

All they are doing is destroying the liberty that so many have fought and died to protect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. the whole CONCEPT of unlawful combatant is wrong
anyone remember the discussion during the Military Commissions Act debate whether americans could be termed illegal combatants??

Illegal combatant = untermensch
Homeland security...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Don't remember much of it
I do remember unlawful combatant means they lose their prisoner of war rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
horseshoecrab Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. good on you merh -- close the torture loophole!
Every time you hear someone say that we must limit interrogation techniques to those contained in the Army Field Manual, bear in mind that Appendix M of that manual now has incorporated those SERE training "separation" techniques.

Along with the Center for Constitutional Rights, another organization, Physicians for Human Rights is fighting for this too. http://physiciansforhumanrights.org/library/news-2006-09-06.html


Close the torture loophole in the Army Field Manual!


horseshoecrab
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. thank you for the link
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R YES!!!
Thank you!!!!!

The FM was changed during the timeline between the DTA and the MCA. Which ought to be very revealing as to the motive for changing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC