Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

15-Year-Old Denied Permit For Crash He Had When He Was 6.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 03:53 PM
Original message
15-Year-Old Denied Permit For Crash He Had When He Was 6.
WHOA! Don't let your kids get tickets at age 6.

**************************************************************************

15-Year-Old Denied Permit For Crash He Had When He Was 6
Teen Must Pay Fee, Get Special Insurance

POSTED: 5:29 pm MDT April 22, 2009
UPDATED: 11:34 am MDT April 23, 2009


DENVER -- Fifteen-year-old Jesse Jakan was so excited to get his driving permit on Friday.

He had passed the written exam and even taken a driving course. But the Department of Motor Vehicle denied him his permit.

"I didn't really understand what they were trying to tell me," said Jakan.

Jakan said the DMV asked him if he had ever driven before. He said "No." He said a supervisor then told him he had a driving record and needed to have his license/permit reinstated.

"At the time, I was furious," said Chris Jakan, Jesse’s dad. "I thought it was the most absurd thing I had ever heard."

When Jesse was 6 years old he was playing around in his mom's car and popped it out of gear. The car rolled down the driveway and crashed into another car.

"This is ridiculous. A 6-year-old should not be held accountable for his actions at that age," said Chris. "I am just wondering why a 6-year-old would have been ticketed for driving a car when he wasn't driving. He popped it out of gear by accident."

A spokesman for the DMV said state law prohibits them from discussing an individual driver's record.

"The issue raised in this case will be addressed and DMV will advise Mr. Jakans how to proceed," said Mark Couch of the DMV.

The statute cited in the case states "if an applicant for a license to operate a motor vehicle in this state prior to the issuance of a valid driver's or minor driver’s license or instruction permit or in violation of the terms of any instruction permit within 36 months prior to said application, the department has the authority to deny the issuance of said license for not more than 12 months."

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/19255001/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. At age 6, his parents should have received the ticket, not him
What a weird situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. isn't from age 6 to age 15 greater than 36 months? does DMV do math?
just askin? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Uh, 36 months vs. 9 years.
And he had had no license or permit to reinstate. Aside from the idiocy, there is an apparent mismatch of the incident and the cited law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Must be Republicans morans working at the DMV. nt
Edited on Thu Apr-23-09 04:21 PM by valerief
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesbolton Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It's all Republicans at the DMV
No one else can be that slow, lazy, and error prone. Besides you can just tell by looking at them that they're dumb enough to be a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Statute as cited above does not make any sense in English.
It is one huge run on sentence...
Can anyone translate that to something intelligible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC