Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush: “Who authorized putting him on pain medication?”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:21 AM
Original message
Bush: “Who authorized putting him on pain medication?”
Late March 2002: President Bush Allegedly Takes Personal Interest in Interrogation of Zubaida

In a 2006 book, New York Times reporter James Risen will claim that shortly after al-Qaeda leader Abu Zubaida is captured in March 2002, “According to a well-placed source with a proven track record of providing extremely reliable information to the author, George Tenet soon learned that George Bush was taking a very personal interest in the Zubaida case.” Just days after Zubaida’s arrest, Tenet goes to the White House to give his usual daily Presidential Daily Briefing (PDB). Bush asks Tenet about what the CIA is learning from Zubaida’s interrogation. Tenet replies that nothing has been learned yet because Zubaida is heavily wounded and is too groggy from painkillers to talk coherently. Bush then allegedly asks Tenet, “Who authorized putting him on pain medication?”

http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=alate0302bushzubaida#alate0302bushzubaida

Prisoner Abuse
http://www.historycommons.org/project.jsp?project=us_torture_abuse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. When we get to the bottom of this, we'll find that
the level of Bush's evil is rivaled by few in history - Hitler (who was mad), Stalin, Pol Pot...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I agree with that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. When fear and hatred shake hands
cruelty and inhumanity are the result. Where is the justice for his victims?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. So Idiot George is a doctor now?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. wow !
evil!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Zubaida is heavily wounded. *: “Who authorized putting him on pain medication?”
What a SICK mfer!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. apparently, he was engaged in the concrete details of SOME things
Edited on Tue Apr-28-09 12:04 PM by Supersedeas
way to focus on the specifics, el bushbo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. If Bush did ask that he is even more depraved than I thought, if that is possible.
There was the gloating over signing execution warrants in Texas and the reports about Bush blowing up frogs as a kid. But to think that a President would approve withholding pain medication from a wounded enemy prisoner boggles the mind. Of course it might have been his idea of a frat boy joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
9. He's wondering why he can't get some of those painkillers if a terrorist can. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. Sadist in Chief
For a boy who allegedly shot BB guns at his brothers and did who knows what to small animals, Bush as recalled by Trudeau offers no small insight into what is clearly a sadistic (and as we have repeatedly said, sociopathic) individual.

Bush has continued to insist that his administration does not conduct torture by merely redefining what torture is, as distinct from how it is outlawed under International law and agreements. You can see how he accomplishes this "redefining" by his claim to The New York Times, while he was at Yale, that branding fraternity pledges was not cruel because "it didn’t hurt any more than a cigarette burn."

The Democrats have long treated the torture issue as though it were a public policy issue and not an outgrowth of a psychological deviancy on the part of Bush (along with the Cheney/Addington "we are accountable to no one" worldview).

As BuzzFlash has long argued, Bush is a model narcissistic sociopath, who is devoid of the ability to empathize. It is the characteristic of such people to have the ability to "appear" to be concerned about others, but that is just for show. The inner heart is empty. You can knock all you want, but you won’t find anyone home in the empathy department when it comes to sociopathic personalities.

The long-ago forgotten recollection of Garry Trudeau, as corroborated in the Yale Daily News and The New York Times, indicates quite clearly Bush’s mindset: inside of the "great hugger" is a "great sadist."

That may explain why Bush's latest appointment for Attorney General has been so brazenly coy in claiming that he has not made up his mind yet on whether or not water boarding is torture. (Not to mention Mukasey’s Stepford-like assertion of the doctrine of "unitary authority" for the executive branch, which is what grants the White House its ability to torture at will.)

The Bush Administration’s obsession with torture is deep-seated and personal. George’s love of it in particular is not so much for what it might do in assisting in the war on terror, as it is a perverse exercise in humiliation and the exercise of absolute power to inflict pain on other people through the use of unaccountable and an all-powerful authority.

What we have been seeing unfold before us since the rendition and Abu Ghraib stories first broke (and there were earlier indications in Afghanistan of mass killings and torture, although not as widely reported) is the elevation of a sadistic fraternity head to the highest office in the land, but his delight at "harmlessly" branding pledges has just progressed to the next level: torture, murder (remember the tortured to death cadavers at Abu Ghraib), and the "disappeared."

http://blog.buzzflash.com/analysis/227


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
horseshoecrab Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. Blech!

Sadly, this is not only entirely believable, but it is just what we've come to expect from that horrid little man.


horseshoecrab
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Frat Boy longs for the lost innocence of his childhood . . .
. . . when he delighted in sticking a firecracker up a frog's ass and lighting it.

Bush is a sick, sadistic basket case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC