Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Specter needs to prove he's not replacing Lieberman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 04:15 PM
Original message
Specter needs to prove he's not replacing Lieberman
Edited on Tue Apr-28-09 04:23 PM by dusmcj
First off as a facilitator and lamplighter for the Likudnik branch of the neocons (precisely: those folks who think that conservative interpretations of Israel's security interests have higher priority than America's national interest, and/or that the latter is always equivalent to the former). Note I used the word 'conservative', please let's not argue about universality because it's not present here. And I'll laugh in your face if you say I'm antisemitic.

That said: more broadly Mr. Specter has played a peculiar role in the Senate for decades. It goes something like this:

Flaming Reactionary GOP Hack: "we're introducing mandatory wearing of burkahs for both genders and deportation of the poor."

Honest Moderate Arlen: "I'm shocked, shocked and appalled at the meanspiritedness of my Republican colleagues. I'm going home to Pennsylvania to meditate."

(weeks pass while the issue is hashed over by Wolf Blitzer exploring why deportation of the poor might not be a bad thing and how Sen. Specter gives the GOP a humanitarian face.)
(...)
Honest Moderate Arlen: "I want to announce that after long negotiations with my good friend Flaming Reactionary GOP Hack, we've reached a compromise on the original proposal whereby the poor of both genders will have to wear burkahs on Tuesdays and when menstruating. We appreciate the cooperative spirit under which we were able to arrive at this vast improvement over the original legislation."

I.e. feign shock and dismay at a GOP initiative that the opposition is (accurately) describing as a piece of shit, fall back and let the center and left wear themselves out about it, and then come back in as the "moderate Republican" who negotiated superficial changes in the piece of shit or if nothing else represented a nonexistent GOP moderate wing, but it's still a piece of shit contentwise.

I believe I recall him playing this role to the hilt in various PATSY Act negotiations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not to mention his "magic bullet" theory ...
Lots of DUers even call him that ("Magic Bullet Specter").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. pls elaborate or give a pointer
I'm intrigued - is this a Grassy Knoll ref or other ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yep -- grassy knoll, JFK ...
He was the one who came up with the theory that one
bullet could injure both JFK and Connally (even
changing directions if I'm remembering right).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. that's it, he's a Gray!!! /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, for starters, Spector is willing to be called a democrat by party designation
Lieberman is an independent, and already proven he'll jump ship and back when it's convenient for him.

I'm not saying he's perfect, far from it. But I'll take a moderate that will vote with us most of the time, over a republican that tows the party line at all costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lsewpershad Donating Member (964 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. When
a politician is changing his party affiliation to save his ass, can we trust him. Can we really trust Specter? On so many occasions when I thought he truely understand our plight he votes against America and as a repuke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC