Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice Kennedy Questions 'Fairness' of Voting Rights Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 12:51 PM
Original message
Justice Kennedy Questions 'Fairness' of Voting Rights Act
WASHINGTON —

Justice Anthony Kennedy, who in recent years has been the deciding vote on race cases, said Wednesday he believes the 1965 Voting Rights Act has prevented bias discrimination in the covered states but that it may now, decades after passage, be unfairly punishing some states over others.

The disputed provision gives the Justice Department authority to review proposed election-law changes in nine states, mostly in the South, and several counties and municipalities where race discrimination has historically been most flagrant. The act, passed in 1965, has been repeatedly renewed by Congress and upheld by the court over the years. At issue now is Congress's 2006 renewal of the act.

Kennedy suggested by many of his questions that he thought the covered states were being forced "to surrender" their powers to the federal government.

"This is a great disparity in treatment," he said at one point, emphasizing the burden on the covered states to bring their proposed election law changes to the federal government . . .

Lawyer Gregory Coleman, representing a Texas utility district that challenged the law as unconstitutional, said the "unremitting and defiant" bias in voting that Congress targeted in the 1965 law does not exist anymore.

"We are in a different day," insisted Coleman, who mentioned Obama's election in legal filings but not in the courtroom Wednesday.


read more: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2009-04-29-scotus-voting-rights-act_N.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. No the "unremitting and defiant" doesn't exist anymore
Prior to 1965 minorities couldn't even register to vote. Now, as we learned from Florida in 2000, they can register but they'll be erased from the voting rolls before election day and won't find out about it until it's too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. We're in a different day all right
Edited on Wed Apr-29-09 01:16 PM by DebbieCDC
With all the new ways that have been developed to circumvent the VRA -- voter roll purges, police presence at polling places, less voting machines in minority neighborhoods, etc. etc. ad infinitum.

Different day, same old sunrise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC