|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 01:29 PM Original message |
Leahy invites Bybee to testify before Senate Judiciary Committee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. There's an invite no one want to get. And to top it off, it's BYOB! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 01:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Bring your own (water) board?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
life_long_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 01:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. Surf's up, Babee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
2. WTF does Leahy even waste his time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 01:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. So he should do nothing? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 01:37 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Leahy must follow the procedural avenues first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
4. If Leahy was serious, Bybee would get a SUBPOENA, not an invite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 01:39 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Subpoena is 2nd level invite - Mr. Bybee, we asked out of courtesy, but we REALLY MUST INSIST |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 01:39 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Eh ........... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 02:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Good point (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 01:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. No............ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
7. oh how very collegial and courteous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
10. i'd suggest a subpoena, an invite won't get him there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
12. what happened to the OPR Report? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
13. drip, drip, drip... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
15. Invites?????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
16. Sheldon Whitehouse will make Judge Bybee cry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 02:08 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Jeez, I was thinking the same thing Senator Whitehouse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-29-09 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
17. Invited? He should be summoned under threat of subpoena. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC