Couldn't help but raise an eyebrow when I saw the following link on the Google News page this morning:
FACT CHECK: Obama's Job Creation, Deficit Claims Questionable
President Obama turned the page on 100 days in office with an iffy boast about job creation and claims of fiscal prudence that are hard to square with his spending. - FOXNews
Isn't that and oxymoron (or is that "oxymoran"?) The "AP" op-ed makes a number of spurious claims with nothing to back them up (surprise!).
From the article (you don't need to give them a Hit):
President Obama turned the page on 100 days in office with an iffy boast about job creation and claims of fiscal prudence that are hard to square with his spending.
Obama spoke with abundant confidence about his chances for achieving the big-ticket items on his agenda despite economic calamity:
-- His assertion that his proposed budget "will cut the deficit in half by the end of my first term" is an eyeball-roller for many economists, given the uncharted terrain of trillion-dollar deficits the government is negotiating.
-- He promised vast savings from increased spending on preventive health care in the face of doubts that such an effort, however laudable it might be for public welfare, can pay for itself, let alone yield huge savings.
-- He pitched a remedy for Social Security's long-term crisis that analysts say won't fix half the problem.
Now, the story (which was released just this morning) doesn't claim to be "fact-checking his speech last night", but since Fox didn't even cover the presser, chances are many Fox viewers aren't aware these subjects were not even brought up. Maybe it's just me, but I don't remember ANY "
boast about job creation or fiscal prudence" in his speech last night. Nor do I remember (please correct me if I'm wrong) about "
cutting the deficit in half" (a claim he
has made in the past, but did not make last night). Neither am I aware Obama made these claims
ON DAY 100 like the story suggests.
Nor did he bring up "savings from health care reform" or anything about "Social Security" last night.
"Fact check"? I'd think the first fact they'd want to "check" is
whether or not he actually said the things you claim in his speech last night. That would seem like a no-brainer... but then, look who I'm talking about.