Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Flu has sole U.S. surgical mask producer scrambling (CNN)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:08 PM
Original message
Flu has sole U.S. surgical mask producer scrambling (CNN)
By Ed Lavandera
CNN

RICHLAND HILLS, Texas (CNN) -- The machines are buzzing as dozens of workers package freshly made surgical masks. More than 1 million will be made in one day inside Prestige Ameritech's manufacturing facility near Fort Worth, Texas.

The swine flu outbreak has made this small company a big deal.

"Everyone knows who we are now," said Mike Bowen, executive vice president of the surgical mask manufacturer. "It's actually been pretty crazy."

Prestige Ameritech is ramping up production. For the first time in the company's history, it will be manufacturing masks 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Bowen also is looking to hire up to 20 workers to handle the workload.

Ever since Bowen and his business partner, Dan Reese, showed up to work Monday morning, the phones haven't stopped ringing. With the World Health Organization and national governments confirming cases of swine flu in at least 11 countries, orders for masks are coming in from around the world.
***
more: http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/04/30/swine.flu.masks/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Most surgical masks are made in Mexico and China."
It's all a plot to boost sales!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. IMPORATANT NOTE- Surgical Masks are good for those that are sick to wear
they will help them reduce the spread of their illness. HOWEVER surgical masks will not protect the healthy. The only masks that will provide protection to the healthy are N-95 respirators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. More disinformation.
Masks are not meant to be 100% protection, but they DO provide a level of protection to the healthy.

They provide a barrier to droplet spray (coughs and sneezes).

They prevent one from touching their mouth and nose.


Not a complete solution but one hell of a lot better than nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You better not be saying that about my information
Edited on Fri May-01-09 03:22 PM by NJmaverick
I will tell you this, Holiday Inn Express expert, I am CERTIFIED to train other fit testers for the N-95 respirators. The N-95 respirator is a HEPA (high efficiency particulate arrestor) mask that will be 95% successful in stopping all particles .3 microns or greater. Most flu viruses are at that .3 micron level (there are viruses that can be smaller). While the masks are not 100% effective, they will provide adequate protection (assuming it fits properly and worn properly- which is what the fit testing is for) because it takes more than one or two virus particles to create an infection condition (for most people).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. If you're saying that they're of no value to the healthy, I am.
Your own information contradicts that notion.

No, they're nowhere near 100% effective, but at less that $1.00 each they're a cheap layer of protection for the healthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Stick to opinions about politics and leave Public Health to the professionals
that's my advice to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Ok, genius...if N95 masks DO provide at least a partial barrier (as you admit),
Edited on Fri May-01-09 04:13 PM by MercutioATC
why are they of no use to the healthy?

(on edit)

Upon rereading, I see your statements pertained to N95 respirators, not masks.


That said, the CDC still disagrees with your contention.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Here is a use for the masks that people scoffing at this miss
Edited on Fri May-01-09 03:40 PM by nadinbrzezinski
their use in preventing the spread is questionable at best... that is true

BUT

Here is where they help... and why I do expect to see them in otherwise healthy individuals

1.- Those who scoff this take it a little more seriously

2.- Those who feel they have lost control, common in disasters, are doing something proactive, which is good for the psyche

On the down side, there is one... assuming we have full blown, they also increase risky behavior

They also have the side benefit of keeping hands off face

And this is the angle most specialists who stick to the actual data are not looking at

The you should wear masks in Japan, all over Asia and Mexico was done for the psychological end of the spectrum... but call me silly if you wish
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. The problem is all the Holiday Inn Express experts lack the experience
to put the situation into its proper perspective. If you have been in public health for a period of time you have a far better feel for what's happening. It's like telling a non-baseball fan what a players batting average is. You could explain to them what a batting average is, but because they don't have the experience of following the game, they don't have the ability to assess the signficance of it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. Yeah, and for me... it is seeing a plan I helped developed
in a very, early, as in diapers stage, implemented in front of me....

It was and still is very eerie

Surreal, but for other reasons than the usual
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. "surreal", that explains a everything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. You need to take your own advice, as you are not a medical professional.
And yes, I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Medical professionals are some of the worse when it comes to public health
so take your own advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. Tell that to LA County Public Health, who gave me a letter of commendation
a number of years ago. I have a degree in microbiology first of all, which includes several top university courses on virology and immunology including laboratory classes. I have a DVM, which does NOT mean my brains got sucked out for 4 years. We had to learn a hell of a lot of graduate level virology, immunology, and epidemiology just to get through, and I have 27 years of practice throughout which I have had a special interest in zoonoses and public health issues.

So stuff a sock in your insults. I'm pulling rank, Mr. Mask Fitter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. Well judging by your posts, you don't understand the field
Edited on Fri May-01-09 08:35 PM by NJmaverick
and your comments not well informed. Then again a degree in biology doesn't give you any rank to pull, although it would get you a sales job with a drug company.

PS- I have one of those letters from my county health department. They give them out to score political points, it doesn't confer on you any knowledge of the public health profession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Perhaps you could enlighten us as to your qualifications, NJmaverick...
...other than being a respirator fit instructor, that is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. That is just a small part of it
I have 15 years in the hospital business, 24 years in Emergency Medical Services and now 5 years in public health. I started with a degree in engineer, during which I designed a knee brace that I later published a paper on. I am a certified EMT as well have Heavy Rescue. I know am a public health emergency messaging coordinator and medical reserve corp coordinator for an agency that is involved in public health preparedness for things like bio-terrorism attacks and pandemic outbreaks. My job is to inform and educate people like you and the lab tech. I am also the one that teaches our lab tech friend how to protect themselves from infection. I have training in surviving virtually every sort of dangerous environment known. That includes fires, confined spaces, blood born illness risks, hazardous materials, biological and chemical attacks and air borne illness environments. I have been trained in and worked with nearly every type of PPE that is out there. I just roll my eyes that the ignorance and arrogance that is displayed by some here at DU. People that have no clue, no training and no experience presuming to lecture me because they sell drugs or work or in lab or worse have no background what so ever in either the health care or public health professions. It's a shame, it really is.

I have had to work with and teach PPE protection through the introduction of:

AIDS
drug resistant TB
SARS
Hep C
Anthrax
and now H1N1 Influenza

Because of my current job I have had copious amounts of training the flu, pandemics proper precautions etc. In real life I teach others how to protect themselves from TB, Aids, Small Pox, Anthrax etc. I am certified to do so. Beyond being certified I have been and still (to a lesser degree these days) tasked with ensuring others are properly protecting themselves when working in dangerous situations. Unfortunately all that is required for people to post dangerous misinformation is a keyboard and a DU membership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. N95 respirators are not 100% effective either, lol.
Surgical masks do a great job of limiting spread of flu simply by keeping spewed fluid droplets from going far or going directly into an adjacent person's nose.

Cheap, easy, practical, and they HELP. Nothing is a 100% guarantee against spread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. No shiite sherlock thay is why the are called N-95 the 95 stands for it's 95% efficiency
however telling people that wearing a surgical mask will protect them is beyond irresponsible. It's closer to criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Perhaps the issue is the word "protection"
By definition, N95 masks only filter 95% of stuff .3 microns or larger. It's not complete protection. When you add fit issues, the protection efficiency drops further.

However, N95 masks are inexpensive and they DO provide some level of protection. Yes, it would be irresponsible to suggest that they offer 100% protection. It's also irresponsible to suggest that they provide NO protection to healthy people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. I am through wasting my time. I posted the facts for those wise enough to listen
the rest are on their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Well, since the CDC doesn't agree...
...and your only response is that yes, the CDC recommends wearing N95 masks but we're all just not bright enough to understand that they really don't mean it...

...and you seem to believe your job as a mask fitting instructor uniquely qualifies you as a "public health professional" while actual professionals here are "Holiday Inn Express experts"...

...and you're rude and dismissive and I don't think you could find your ass with both hands and a flashlight...


...I'm happy that you're through wasting your time with us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. Funny as I have sat in on 3 or 4 conference calls with the CDC
I think I am in a better position that you, as to what they agree with and what they don't agree with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Oh good! Since you talk to them on a regular basis, can you ask why they lie on their own web page?
Edited on Fri May-01-09 09:37 PM by MercutioATC
It's funny, what they say to you seems to be different than what they say to the rest of the world...


Or, perhaps, you're speaking of this CDC:

http://w3.cultdeadcow.com/cms/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. They didn't lie they were careful in their choice of words
basically they are saying for those that are scared a surgical mask will not help, but no where does it say it will give you proper protection. A fact that I have already stated and if people were not so full of themselves I would have only had to say once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Here's what CDC has to say:
Edited on Fri May-01-09 03:49 PM by kestrel91316
http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/masks.htm

"When it is absolutely necessary to enter a crowded setting or to have close contact with persons who might be ill, the time spent in that setting should be as short as possible. If used correctly, facemasks and respirators may help reduce the risk of getting influenza, but they should be used along with other preventive measures, such as avoiding close contact and maintaining good hand hygiene. A respirator that fits snugly on your face can filter out small particles that can be inhaled around the edges of a facemask, but compared with a facemask it is harder to breathe through a respirator for long periods of time."

"When crowded settings or close contact with others cannot be avoided, the use of facemasks or respirators in areas where transmission of swine influenza A (H1N1) virus has been confirmed should be considered as follows:
1 - Whenever possible, rather than relying on the use of facemasks or respirators, close contact with people who might be ill and being in crowded settings should be avoided.
2 - Facemasks should be considered for use by individuals who enter crowded settings, both to protect their nose and mouth from other people's coughs and to reduce the wearers' likelihood of coughing on others; the time spent in crowded settings should be as short as possible.
3 - Respirators should be considered for use by individuals for whom close contact with an infectious person is unavoidable. This can include selected individuals who must care for a sick person (e.g., family member with a respiratory infection) at home.
These interim recommendations will be revised as new information about the use of facemasks and respirators in the current setting becomes available."

~~~~~~~~~~

IMHO people who spread the blatant misinformation about masks, saying they are useless, probably own stock in the companies that make n95 respirators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Quandry: Do I trust the "professional mask fitter" or the CDC?
I think I'll go with the CDC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Perhaps Darwin's laws will play out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Perhaps.
I'll opt for partial protection over none at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. CDC DOES recommend n95 respirators for flu lab workers:
http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/guidelines_labworkers.htm

If anybody can find a CDC recommendation that the general public should wear these respirators, I'll eat my shoes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. You lack the understandings of the basic subject matter to even begin to grasp
how clueless you sound. Leave public health to the professionals. What I told you is correct, what you are trying to comprehend, with out the requisite back ground knowledge, is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. If you actually understood what you are reading
you would know they are referring to an N-95 when they talk about respirators. That's why they are not reccommended for those coming in contact with the sick AND they are very careful to explain the limited benefits they offer when coming into contact with the general public. I can't believe how DUers are playing games with a public health issue. This isn't like saying if you think Hillary should be VP, this is real and the Holiday Inn Express experts here are dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Don't presume to lecture me on public health, lol.
CDC does NOT recommend N95s or any other "respirator" for the general public because of the fitting and discomfort issues. Face masks are fine with them for most people.

Medical and lab personnel are the only ones CDC says MAY need to use N95s. You are the one who needs to learn how to read.

N95s are impractical, uncomfortable, unrealistic, and overkill for the man on the street, when a molded surgical mask will suffice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. When it's clear that you don't understand, I will make an effort to teach you
Edited on Fri May-01-09 08:43 PM by NJmaverick
On top of that your straw man arguments are pretty comical. I told you (and unlike you I didn't have to research it on the web, I have sat in on 3 or 4 CDC conference calls this week as well as with the state and local HDs) what will and will not work. You can play the typical DU intellectually dishonest games, but what I said is 100% correct. I have little use in fear mongers or game players. So find someone else to play with. I have put out the facts and those smart enough and wise enough will listen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. I'm not a "Holiday Inn Express" expert, lol. I'm a real one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. You have already admitted you don't have a back ground in public health
Edited on Fri May-01-09 08:14 PM by NJmaverick
You shallow understanding of the field has lead you to take a mistaken position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. ...thought this flu panic was already being blown off as a big zero?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. FAIL.
The swine flu isn't that bad. It's no worse than the normal flu. Those susceptible to bad side effects normal flu (infants, elderly, people with depressed immune systems) are more susceptible to bad effects of swine flu. the average person is not going to die from swin flu, just as the average person is not going to die from the normal flu. Get a clue about the flu, people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. The people who have died have mostly been in the young and healthy
category

You know that right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeep789 Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. I agree with most of your post but the FAIL is inappropriate
OP just posted a news story and fact, nothing to fail. The reason for the mask shortage may well be hysteria but that is no reason to FAIL the op. I really dislike when people post FAIL unless it is an obvious Freeper using false facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarryNite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. Masked people...
I actually saw a mother and son wearing masks at Wal-Mart today. But considering it was Wal-Mart that's probably not such a bad idea to do every time you go there. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. i saw a woman today shopping at meier's wearing one...
and the store was almost empty.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeep789 Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
29. i'm wearing a full NBC suit..
i don't fuck around.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
37. Give me a grant I'll start a medical mask business in a week!
More lucrative will be the earnings of the person that finally comes up with the BULLSHIT DETECTOR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomreedtoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Look at your icon, Shadow. You already have a mask!
Edited on Fri May-01-09 06:54 PM by tomreedtoon
Just wash that red bandana every day and you have a better mask than those guys can produce. More stylish, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
38. The ticket checker on our lightrail system had a mask on
Edited on Fri May-01-09 06:34 PM by rainbow4321
You could tell people were a little caught off guard when he got on the train and yelled like they always do "tickets please" and when we all looked up at him, we saw his masked face.
I've started bringing degermer gel with me in a little travel bottle just to have some protection. I do wonder at what point, if at all, that Dallas will put any restrictions on DART passengers. As often as these trains run back and forth, I can't see them having time to sanitize them very often.
I also wonder if the guy's mask was his idea of if DART (his employer) is telling them to wear one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC