Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I hope Obama picks a gay judge/lawyer for the SCOTUS position....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:48 PM
Original message
I hope Obama picks a gay judge/lawyer for the SCOTUS position....
Edited on Fri May-01-09 07:32 PM by crimsonblue
LBGT's are every bit as human as every heterosexual person out there, and deserve equal representation under the law. I sincerely hope that President Obama selects a homosexual judge or lawyer to fill Justice Souter's seat on the bench. Could republicans really oppose him/her based solely on sexual orientation? Do you know how much that conflict in Congress would move gay relations forward? It's time that our gay brothers and sisters have the ability to come out of the darkness and live a free Americans in a country that affirms the right of all peoples.

EDIT: I didn't realize that the use of the word "homosexual" would piss so many people off. I'm sorry. I've always heard homosexual used as a noun, and it certainly was not meant as a pejorative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree on principle.....
I also agree because I would love to see wingnut heads explode all over the country. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. A female Hispanic liberal homosexual judge/lawyer
Edited on Fri May-01-09 06:53 PM by seemslikeadream
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I'm leaning more toward a male hispanic homosexual judge/lawyer
who plays the guitar like Jimmy Page. Can't help it. I've always been partial to gay guys. And to Jimmy Page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. (*_*)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. I hope that he picks a good solid liberal who knows the constitution is not
for shredding when the opportunity arises. I hope that the nominee will uphold fair elections.

I don't care what sex they are or what sex they have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
29. ibid.
thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Let's all study law then there'll be a better chance of getting in.
Still, I can't really argue against your post; especially when the media paints us all out as being nasty little monsters that just spread disease (I loathe stereotypes, even to the point where I will speak up against things that help promote stereotypes, so I might not be around in June because I'm bound to get flamed for my opinions over a certain event that I spoke about 4 years ago and have no intentions of doing so ever again because of the bullshit responses, but I digress). If there were three people - equally qualified - how is the deciding factor put into place, and the repercussions for the 2 that don't get it. Especially if they are not white males. We're so cordoned off by niche characteristics than what counts: Being objective and thinking of the whole. I want somebody objective in the part, and I don't care about the color, sexual orientation, or anything else, as long as the person is law abiding. Is that too much to ask for?

I think lots of hetero white males aren't paranoid and aren't out to keep their homosexual countrymen down either. It's not 1950 any longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
konnichi wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. You should say something like "a homosexual judge/justice"
Sorry to belabor the point but there's no such thing as "a" homosexual.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Roberts is gay
Edited on Fri May-01-09 07:04 PM by KittyWampus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
konnichi wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Not to be argumentative, but there is no such thing as "a homosexual".
The word is an adjective, not a noun. Like Democratic. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. you are absolutely correct. I was responding to the OP, used wrong phrasing. Just changed it.
Edited on Fri May-01-09 07:06 PM by KittyWampus
And sorry I couldn't get back to my post any faster to change it. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
konnichi wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. No worries, it's just one of my pet peeves aka linguistic hangups.
Thankya


:D
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
konnichi wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. No worries, it's just one of my pet peeves aka linguistic hangups.
Thankya


:D
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. I don't think we each get to reengineer the English language at will
The word "homosexual" is most certainly used as a noun by millions of people. It is therefor a noun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
konnichi wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. And the word "loose" is used as a verb by millions of idiots.
Doesn't mean it is one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Are you familiar with the debate between prescriptive vs descriptive linguistics?
The verb "loose" is incorrect when it's used by someone who thinks they're using the verb "lose". But people using "homosexual" as a noun certainly intend to use that word. Heck, it's in the dictionary as a noun.

You may find its use or application offensive; it might not be that hard to convince me, too, that it is offensive. But it would then be an offensive noun. There's plenty of those in the English language. Their offensiveness doesn't make them cease to exist as words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. PS, Regarding " 'Loose' as a verb.
Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord;
He is trampling out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored;
He hath loosed the fateful lightning of His terrible swift sword;
His truth is marching on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
41. "Loose" can be used as noun, verb, or adjective:

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/loose

Loose the hounds! verb, release the dogs

Eighteen cents in loose change. adjective

The escapee has been on the loose for three days. noun
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
40. What about this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. And you know this how?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Wrong.
This came up during the Larry Craig mess. My politically astute gay friends set me straight (ha!) on this score. In that case, his public indecency was the indecency of man who identified himself to the world as a straight man. The shame and ridicule he brought to the Congress and his own family were the shame and ridicule earned by straight man.

So no matter what Mr Roberts does with his willie, the fact is that he's a self-identifying heterosexual. He lives the straight lifestyle, he presents himself as straight, and the moral atrocities he passes down from the bench are the judgments of a professing heterosexual.

Wherever and with whomever the chief justice bangs his gavel is none of my business and discussions of it do not belong in the public square. If he starts professing a different orientation, then he'll be part of an oppressed minority. If he sticks with his story, accurate or not, he is not part of that minority; he's just their oppressor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. "He lives the straight lifestyle". You know, if someone on DU posted that sentence using the word
Edited on Fri May-01-09 07:25 PM by KittyWampus
"gay" instead of "straight" there'd be hell to pay.

I am not going to argue with you.

He obviously lived openly enough to get a photo of himself taken with two other men posing around a pie.

Edit- but ultimately, you are correct. I have to admit to not knowing with certainty and who really cares anyway.

The important thing is his record on the SCOTUS.

Which would bring us back to the opening post. How would we know if nominee is gay if they aren't really open about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. I didn't know about that picture.
I'd love to get a look at it. I'm not sure "posing around a pie" constitutes a preference for same gender romance, unless you're using the word "pie" as a euphemism that I may not understand.

We're free to draw whatever inferences about his behavior we wish. If you ask a man if he's gay, I think you have to respect his answer. It's a free country (no thanks to Roberts & friends). Like race and religion, sexual orientation is a demographic category subject to a complex web of personal reaffiliation and arbitrary social impositions.

The facts are easier to deal with if we begin with a pro-choice, pro-freedom orientation. You get to say what you are, demographically, and the rest of us ought to respect it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. Roy Cohn was also a self-identifying heterosexual. He just liked to fuck guys. n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. I'm more interested in how he fucked the Bill of Rights
Who Roberts co-diddles with is only relevant if we intend to blackmail him. If not, then the purpose of calling him out as gay is using homosexuality as an insult. I don't cotton to that--I think it undermines the whole notion of respect and toleration that we should, as liberals, both preach and practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #27
44. That was just a nasty rumor...
Spread by J Edgar Hoover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
43. He is?
I thought Souter was gay. OMG. Two of them! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. How about an intelligent Liberal judge regardless of gender, ethnicity, or sexual preference?
Best person for the job would be a good thing regardless of label
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. There you go
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
37. You realize you already labeled any potential nominee...
when you stated a "Liberal judge".

How a bout an intelligent nominee regardless of gender, ethnicity, sexual preference, political affiliation or social compass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. nope, I want a Liberal. It's our turn. It's why some of us worked so hard to get Obama in
I'd like a defender of the Bill Of Rights and the Constitution...and legal marijuana too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. I was kind of hoping for a Native American myself.
Every bit as human as every person out there, and deserve equal representation under the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
39. I'd love that too. That's the very least that they deserve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. They wouldnt openly opose him/her for that reason
well the way they are acting lately maybe they would but I doubt it. It would be cool to watch em squirm though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. I think it'll happen soon--maybe not with this nominee, seeing as how he/she will be the first...
but if I were Obama I'd vet and choose someone now while my popularity was in the stratosphere. Filibustering by the Republicans will make them look stupid, and pundits will inevitably drag up the "up or down vote" gem the Republicans loved to use when Dubya was squatting in the White House.

Plus we have 59 Dems, plus Olympia Snowe who I can probably guarantee will vote for our nominee than I can Ben Nelson or Arlen Specter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. Gay Jewish woman with a couple of kids (that she and her partner adopted)
and with a healthy portion of Native American heritage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Who smokes and drives an SUV, and breastfed at olive garden
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
34. If Obama nominates a practicing Olive Gardenist to the SCOTUS I'm voting Green in 2013!
Grrr-fuckin'-rrr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'd prefer a Negro womanly kind of judge/lawyer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. you may think I was being slanderous...
but I really wasn't. I don't know the proper usage of the term homosexual, and certainly had no intent of being offensive. Or maybe its the fact that I singled out a gay person for Obama to choose. In that case, I won't apologize. We are not yet at the point in our country's social dialogue that we can disregard race, gender, or sexual orientation. Giving historically discriminated-against groups public equality, as having a gay Justice would do, is unfortunately necessary to reach the point of total equality in our society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
23. I'm hoping that he picks a Texan so that we can show the world that Texas has liberals too
Actually, I don't care at all what the demographics are. I believe that if the president consistantly selects candidates who represent the most enlightened and rigorous of legal expertise in the country, we will necessarily achieve a healthy diversity on the bench.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Butch350 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
32. Such as who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
42. I hope Obama picks a qualified person for the SCOTUS position. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC