I think we should take a look at what hasn't been "leaked"

[ck4829]

Rosa over in GD: P raises a good point, Washington is a very leaky place.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=8405674&mesg_id=8405674

Valerie Plame got outed in a leak.
The CIA is accused of leaking documents over the waterboarding scandal
Bush was accused of leaking info to justify the invasion of Iraq

It looks like these leaks are less and less accidental.

These leaks aren't random, it appears that there are some things that are safe from being leaked out into the press...

Energy Task Force documents.
Those millions of emails that just vanished.
Torture photos.
And what else?

I guess we should all be asking why nothing that puts Cheney and the rest of the previous administration in a bad light has ever been "leaked" to the press.

[villager]

1. It would also require someone in the "free" press willing to publish it

Though I suppose either online, or outside America, there might be such places...

[Fresh_Start]

2. I've thought the same thing many times.

They (Bushco) are and were willing to talk about these topics.
What are they hiding which they are still not ready to talk about