Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Col Wilkerson Drops A BOMBSHELL-Bushco Priority For Intell NOT Aimed At Protecting American People

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:19 AM
Original message
Col Wilkerson Drops A BOMBSHELL-Bushco Priority For Intell NOT Aimed At Protecting American People
Edited on Thu May-14-09 10:25 AM by kpete
*********** Let’s say this slowly: the Bush administration wanted to use 9/11 as a pretext to invade Iraq, even though Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. So it tortured people to make them confess to the nonexistent link.

There’s a word for this: it’s evil.


.........................

On Wednesday, Colin Powell's former chief of staff, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson dropped a bombshell:

*****what I have learned is that as the administration authorized harsh interrogation in April and May of 2002 -- well before the Justice Department had rendered any legal opinion -- its principal priority for intelligence was not aimed at pre-empting another terrorist attack on the U.S. but discovering a smoking gun linking Iraq and al-Qa'ida.

***** So furious was this effort that on one particular detainee, even when the interrogation team had reported to Cheney's office that their detainee "was compliant" (meaning the team recommended no more torture), the VP's office ordered them to continue the enhanced methods. The detainee had not revealed any al-Qa'ida-Baghdad contacts yet. This ceased only after Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi, under waterboarding in Egypt, "revealed" such contacts. Of course later we learned that al-Libi revealed these contacts only to get the torture to stop.

There in fact were no such contacts. (Incidentally, al-Libi just "committed suicide" in Libya. Interestingly, several U.S. lawyers working with tortured detainees were attempting to get the Libyan government to allow them to interview al-Libi....)

....................

The "smoking gun" of the Iraq-Torture Scandal will be proof that the CIA took Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi away from the FBI in February 2002 and sent him to Egypt for one specific reason: to use torture to extract a false confession of Iraq-Al Qaeda ties.

Lawrence Wilkerson's account takes us much closer to finding that "smoking gun."

http://www.democrats.com/lawrence-wilkerson-drops-an-iraq-torture-bombshell
http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/2009/05/the_truth_about/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. This drip, drip, drip is turning into a gusher.
Facts are coming out fast and furious, such as the one in a post below about General Myers and the Geneva Convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. I don't understand. How exactly does this relate to Carrie Prejean?
:shrug:



Why am I surrounded by frickin' idiots?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I love you...
My Depends moment of the day, both the subject line and your sig.

:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. (sorry...this was in response to OP) It was really about ....
Edited on Thu May-14-09 10:59 AM by OneGrassRoot
inflaming tensions and hatred in the ME even more.

Do we REALLY believe they needed confessions to justify ANYTHING?

Why not just lie or plant evidence? Neither of which was/is beyond them, or beyond many in power.

IMHO, they NEVER had America's interests at heart; not the nation, not the citizens. Halliburton et al, sure.

It served their purpose to keep citizens in fear. And, it served their purposes to make sure we had enemies.

They succeeded at both.

Keeping America safe? EPIC FAIL. Criminally epic fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
36. I've said this for years.Most knew it,Never about protecting American lives
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. They tortured furiously to justify Bush's war and invasion..trying to connect 9/11 to Sadam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Killing and torturing for political gain yet go unprosecuted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Of course, when one realizes that Saddam Hussein was murdered over it..
He was the leader of a Sovereign nation after all, and all he did was rattle the rhetoric against the U.S. after 10 years of crushing economic sanctions, while the Oil for Food program ran rife with corruptions.

I think that's why I admire Hugo Chavez so much. He has the audacity of standing up to Bush, and the Bush Administration simply went ballistic. In that respect, I think Chavez is very brave, very foolhardy, and very very lucky that he has lots of friends to keep him from being murdered, deposed or overthrown.

It's not like the U.S. hasn't tried very hard to do this, but the U.S. had revealed it's cards and people are now aware of the Unconventional Warfare tactics used by the US to destabilize regimes. Hell, I think the U.S. Citizens are just now realizing that the very same tactics are being used on them at home!

Look out Evo Morales, the U.S. may be funding a "Freedom Fighter" death squad near you!

I recently heard that now that the U.S. is broke, its role will be Policeman of the world in order to pay off its debts. Our military will be hired out to the PTB to crush any opposition to wresting further control from the remaining group of sovereign nations. Makes perfect sense to me, since the weasels in the Government will do anything to remain in power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #40
71. Uhh, you do realize how widespread this practice is, on the part of the US?
You do know how Saddam Hussein was provided with WMDs to attack Iran in the 80s, right? You do know that this was in response to the Iranian revolution in '79, right? Which was a delayed response to the US engineered coup in '53 to overthrow Mossadeqh and put the Shah back in power. you do know about that? And Hussein's invasion of Kuwait back in... '91... was largely about alleged Kuwaiti slant drilling into fields claimed by Iraq, oil fields that Iraq needed to work to pay back the US for all the WMDs they bought off the US to use on Iran in a failed attempt to conquer Iran.

You realize that every day that Cuba exists is a standing up to the US. And every day that Iran exists in its current form, it's a standing up to the US as well.And likewise with Venezuela. And other nations I'm sure as well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #37
79. Obscure the truth by shifting the blame.
It is only an assumption that they wanted to implicate Saddam in order to justify an invasion.

It is just as likely that they wanted to implicate him in order to obscure who was really behind the 9/11 attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
51. I read about some attempts to plant WMD's in Iraq....
a few years back. here's a link
:hi: I don't know if it was confirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #14
86. Then, there was the fun of having people tortured, don't forget...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt-60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
56. oops, wrong button. But hang them all!
Edited on Thu May-14-09 09:05 PM by Cobalt-60
--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snake in the grass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #56
91. As an opponent of the death penalty...
...I must wholeheartedly agree with you. If anyone deserves a slow and merciless death, it's these people.

I know full well that this is a contradiction to my personal beliefs, and I struggle with it all the time, but I can't help it. It's the only thing that comes close to justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ControlledDemolition Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
62. World peace! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livefreest Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. Not fast enough for my taste. but do we know if someone in congress is
genuinely paying attention in order to know who they will call during an inquiry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
57. BUT ... no one will be held responsible ... period. NO ONE! ... That's amerika for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. It just proves the Chaney assertain that torture works when you want to produce
outcome oriented intelligence.

In this case the outcome sought was a pretext for armed aggression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, duh. Who didn't know that in November of 2000?
Oh, yes: the folks who didn't actually research the candidates, what they wrote, and what their support staff had publicly said.

In other words, the mainstream media, and therefore, the majority of the American people.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. But -- Gore was stiff and you want to have a beer with Bush!
What kind of research priorities do you have? Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Exactly. How come we knew and they "didn't"?
Because I still don't understand how it was possible NOT to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
45. September 2000 - I posted a prediction in an ISP newsgroup that we'd be in a war in the M.E.
... before the end of 2001 if the Smirking Narcissist were to get in office. I even stated that there'd be an "event" of such magnitude that it'd be a foregone conclusion. I said that it'd be Iraq, Iran, or Afghanistan.

It. Was. Obvious.

It couldn't have been clearer.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. With PNAC publishing their agenda on the web it wasn't much of a leap.
What was really weird was the refusal of ordinarily intelligent people to give it a look. They thought they were informed because they read the New York Times. And listened to Ralph "twiddledee and twiddledum" Nader.

At least the Bush Years disabused them of those conceits. Most of them. Ok, some of them. Well, my friends anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #50
75. Yes. The mind boggles over how many did/do dismiss the PNAC out of hand as coincidental/irrelevant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #75
89. Tony Blair called PNAC an Internet conspiracy theory!
He was half right, it was on the Internet, but they were very public about their agenda so technically PNAC wasn't a conspiracy. At least that aspect of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
54. What I'll never get over is how the media never mentioned one word....
Edited on Thu May-14-09 09:02 PM by wildbilln864
of Bush's pappy Prescott's antics. Treason for dealing with the enemy. His company was seized wasn't it?
Also pappy shrub tried with others to over throw the U.S. government and thanks to the patriotism of general Smedley Butler they weren't able to then. Yet no news channel covered any of this that I'm aware ofduring Bush first or second election. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. I saw him on Rachel's show a few days ago. He's PI**ED!
Apparently there was some hot & heavy arguments within the admin when he & Powell were there and he's not hesitating to talk about them. Darth dissing Powell just agrivated he more!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well, no wonder Darth Cheney is out on the talk circuit saying how...
...he kept us safe by torturing.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Oh yes!!! Talking will make it work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. So it was an "after the fact" mission?
Not to "protect" the American people, but to conjure up some "evidence," any evidence, to link what we all knew wasn't true at the time: That Saddam and alQaeda were connected.

So why the invasion? :shrug:





oil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Cuz Saddam was a bad man who tried to get Daddy Bush....
...who knows with the nuts that were in charge what the hell caused them to do the evil they did.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mister Ed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
64. A bad man who was sitting on 10.8% of the world's known oil reserves...
...in a location where U.S. military bases could be built to exert influence on the owners of another 60% of the world's oil.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dangerously Amused Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. Oh, come on now.

Surely you're not implying that it's more than sheer COINCIDENCE that we had two oil men in the White House at the time. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zoff Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. after-the-fact propaganda tour
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
44. 9/11
Certainly we wouldn't get mad if we caught half the team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. Wow, color me surprised
We were certain of this all along...the proof is coming out now.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. the proof is coming out, but will action follow?
Edited on Thu May-14-09 11:02 AM by bdamomma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Sad that your question even needs to asked.
Edited on Thu May-14-09 01:36 PM by sellitman
Only would a President Dennis Kucinich be asking for action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Butch350 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. Asking and getting action are two different things

...the same forces that are stopping Obama would stop Dennis Kucinich too. Take that to the bank.

Don't you get the nature of the game yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
55. Dennis would have been a pit bull for protecting the rights of the American people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #55
72. Dennis was my choice.
But I imagine Dennis would have been another dead progressive if he didn't get with the program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. Not if our current president can help it.
That's pretty much what he's said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
43. absolutely what he said ..and those that listened knew that!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMachineWins Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. Years later we, as a country, still haven't held them responsible, we just "debate" it
as if torture is even up for debate. Evidence only matters if law matters and law seems like something that only applies to us little people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
69. Right On
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
17. Was this at the hearings and under oath? ... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
18. If only Cheney had been a nose picker instead of a cherry picker
we wouldn't be discussing this.

Of course Cheney needed to invade Iraq, how else would Halliburton get their NO BID CONTRACTS to take over Iraq. After all while Cheney was the CEO he found ALL sorts of ways to get around the sanctions the US had imposed on Iraq. He even tried to get Clinton to invade back in '98.

I've said it once and I'll say it again about 9-11, Cheney MADE IT HAPPEN, Bush LET IT HAPPEN.

SHOCK AND AWE, YA'LL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
19. but does the teevee news care they were punked?
so far, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
20. That is definitely worthy of prosecutions.
Move past an ugly chapter with the waterboarding ok I guess. But when the waterboarding was used to create or coax false confession in order to justify an invasion of a soveriegn country that has resulted in over 5000 dead Americans and 1000000 dead Iraqis, that is not something to move past. That calls for an angry mob with torches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. Torture is very effective at making people say what you want to hear
In fact, that's the only thing it's good for. It's pretty bad at getting facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #21
53. If your country's National Security depends on torture...
...then your intelligence community isn't doing their job right.

If your country's National Security depends on sweeping warrantless wire taps on free & innocent citizens...
...then your intelligence community isn't doing their job right.

But if those 2 actions were being done for reasons other than "National Security", let's say, for political reasons...
...then your National Security is already compromised by domestic enemies of the state and your intelligence community has failed their mission.

That is where we are today. Our National Security Agency has failed in their mission. Our Central Intelligence Agency has failed their mission. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has failed their nation.

Until those 3 clean up their acts and start doing their fucking jobs, our country will only continue this downward spiral.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #53
67. Well said.
The Bush Administration keeps up their lie that these methods "kept us safe"--but why did them saying that always make us feel more insecure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #53
68. Bravo file83.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brindis_desala Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #53
80. Before he died George Keenan, the intellectual "force" behind our
national security complex regretted having ever created the CIA. Realized it was hemlock for a democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
astroBspacedog Donating Member (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #21
61. Facts are Irrelevant, --
If you're a neo-con, ----- or even most Republicans aren't very keen on facts these days,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
florida08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
24. I don't recognize
America anymore. Anything goes and the bastard still gets on the boob tube to lie some more. I almost weep anymore at the sight of the flag I love.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mermaid7 Donating Member (156 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
42. Neither do I. The crimes here in America keep becoming more horrific...
Edited on Thu May-14-09 07:54 PM by Mermaid7
Today here in Florida, 4 teens, all 14 years of age, were arrested for raping a 13 year old with a broom handle and a hockey stick.

Last week a man threw a 3 month baby out on to the highway, who died.

I ask, what is happening to our country?

What the .... is happening.

Neighbors are losing their homes to foreclosure. Those w young children we saw riding their bicycles by our house.
Where are they going to go? And why are these houses now going to stand empty? What's the purpose in that?

Why are medical professionals being arrested for speaking their piece in Congress, about providing medical treatment for us all?

What the hell is happening to our country"

When is the madness going to stop?

And now we find our own government was sadistically torturing prisoners? And in order to cover to invade other countries and to kill their citizens and to kill our own soldiers, for their own profit?

What has happened to the President we elected?

What have they done to him?

What has happened to America?

The country we all believed in.

I feel sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #42
66. Mass psychosis..
Ergot in the rye, perhaps? :*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
florida08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #42
76. I wish I knew
I had such hope in Obama. That the America I knew would come back. You state many of the things I have felt as well. There are 6 homes in my community in bankruptcy. There's only 50 in the whole thing. Most can't afford health care. They're destroying social security. The rightwing complains about a woman's right to choose but won't provide children's health care? They don't want universal health care? You know Bill Clinton said something I never forgot..although he was wrong about NAFTA. Abortion rates went down when he was in office. He felt that when a person's life had improved by higher wages and better health care they make better decisions. Simple and true. Now we're back to destroying them. I can't believe that half the country is confused over torture. What's to be confused about? What happened to dignity and the moral compass? I wish I knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
46. I have been weeping when i see the flag for years , and you know those big giant flags at car
dealerships that fly so high..i have had to turn my head away from them for years and years..i bet when they got the news that Chrysler was shutting many of them down now..they don't want to look at those flags anymore either..now that Obama fucked them with Fiat!! Ya know who owns 2% stake in Fiat?????????

Moammar Gadhafi

and where did the prisoner who was tortured supposedly commit suicide ?? Libya..

and who is going to get 7 billion bucks of your money ...Fiat... after Obama cut the legs out from under Chrysler...and their ability to negotiate with Fiat.
and who is going to profit from 7 billion of your tax dollars going to Fiat????


Moammar Gadhafi


So the torture victim was in a prison in the country that the dictator is going to profit from Fiat and your tax dollars..and he just happened to commit suicide before he could be questioned about his rendition to Egypt and his torture ...all a coinsidence wouldn't you say??????????????

nahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
florida08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #46
74. good God
I didn't know that. I own a 300C that we've enjoyed very much. Good solid car. I was angry about what Obama did to Chrysler. What was up with the time limit he imposed? Banks didn't get a timeline and still want more money. Thought Fix It Again Tony was Italian but then Chryser is own primarily by Cerberus and Daimler wants out. I read not too long ago that Fiat wants more labor cuts or it will walk. The UAW and CAW are saying no more cuts. They want them to make non union wages. I hope they do walk now. What is going on when a known terrorist like Gaddafi can have an ownership stake in Chrysler for God sakes? Not to mention GM will be importing Chinese cars to the US in 2 years! A coincidence? More like a coup d'état.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #74
83. more pay for play wouldn't you say????????? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
florida08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #83
88. Indeed I would
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
florida08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
25. For what it's worth
Edited on Thu May-14-09 02:46 PM by florida08
Richard Wolf just discussed this on MSNBC

Just now Nora Odonnell interviewed Senator Whitehous about waterboarding in Iraq..reported at the Daily Beast
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-05-13/cheneys-role-deepens/
Senator Whitehouse stated that if true and he's heard it from several sources(like this one) that it takes the OLC memos out of the hands of it's office and into his hands as it purpose was to prevent imminent attacks into the realm for invesitigations.

Two U.S. intelligence officers confirm that Vice President Cheney’s office suggested waterboarding an Iraqi prisoner, a former intelligence official for Saddam Hussein, who was suspected to have knowledge of a Saddam-al Qaeda connection.

*The former chief of the Iraq Survey Group, Charles Duelfer, in charge of interrogations, tells The Daily Beast that he considered the request reprehensible.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
26. Torture is one thing...but leading a country to war through lies of any sort is quite another
of an epic scale that cannot be ignored. The neocons involved must be exposed and held accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #26
58. sickening the crap is really hitting the fan, and cheney that SOB
is trying to CYA, torturing people to get them to confess there was connection between Iraq and Al Queda, give me break, this all points to Cheney, keep talking Dick, it will catch up to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
60. I think it is raised to a level of Treason
No one is talking about it but that is what the * admin did...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 04:42 AM
Response to Reply #60
73. Oh, it is beyond the threshold of treason. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
27. Applauding Wilkerson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
santamargarita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
28. Project for the New American Century..."the New Pearl Harbor"
Edited on Thu May-14-09 04:48 PM by santamargarita
These assholes planned/wanted 911 so they could 'war profiteer', grab more power, trash the Constitution, spy on Democrats and keep stealing elections! And, I bet Cheney is is trying to stage another attack just to make President Obama look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digidigido Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
32. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##



This week is our second quarter 2009 fund drive.
Donate and you'll be automatically entered into our daily contest.
New prizes daily!



No purchase or donation necessary. Void where prohibited. Click here for more information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
34. What good is the gusher if Obama refuses to acknowledge it and act on it?
I am so discouraged. How can the president continue to ignore such weighty evidence of wrongdoing of such massive proportions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #34
59. Yep. Might as well just whistle and look the other way. NO ONE WILL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitty Herder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
39. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
41. Finally. Someone says it: The torture wasn't extract information, but to create propaganda. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. and so again why did the iraq war happen?
And if bush and his buddies tortured people just for some propaganda,to justify a brutal war, I am sure 911 was mihop. Just my opinion.
Psychopaths with power and people around them ,willing to cover up abuse of power by psychopaths who have it in their hands to do whatever they want, are very dangerous to human life.

Humanity is locked on a planet with cold ice blooded high functioning normal acting psychopaths as well as the lower functioning ones..They do not change,therapy makes them worse, there is no 'rehabbing' of psychopaths. So the question is what are we going to do about this bad people problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
47. Bush and his "cronies"
Most of the top 1 percent wealthy, I bet are high functioning psychopaths.They do not care who gets hurt in their stupid ego games,even if it is entire nations.They probably start wars because the horrors of war are their porn.

Evil they,they didn't get where they are by being fair,nice or compassionate.This system the market the way we are socialized all of it was to protect the most ruthless among us from EVER having to suffer anything never be broke ,helpless or treated like a "normal person" Their excessive self esteem makes them think they can do no wrong they are 'masters' of our reality.In the psychopaths POV there is no good or evil really.,These pigs use us and think that empathy and compassion are tools for making ,more victims to be exploited,self interest to a bully IS doing evil and whatever a psychopath wants is is good no matter how much horrors it causes to us'little peons'. Because we to them are a never ending disposable resource, people to dupe,use up and throw away.


Some of politics along with corporations, military and FBI CIA NSA and Black water,now Xe(laugh)and whatever other quasi corporate/military alphabet soup organizations there are out there jockeying for domination, I am pretty certain are RUN by psychopaths,authoritarians and narcissists playing games at humankind's expense.WAR is one such pointless game that fucked up leaders drag us into,that serves no purpose beyond getting the leader to look big or tough while killing off people for those that think humanity is the problem who sidestep the notion of there are bad personalities among us who are THE problem.

I hate the evil and the trauma these rotten malignant purposeless people cause the rest of humanity..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
48. The reasons we came up with and believe in through those long, dark,
cold days while Cheney and Rumsfeld 'positioned' the war were horrible. We 'knew' what they were doing and the MOST of the people of this country manuevered by Cheney and Rumsfeld and the owners end editors of tne media, the military brass, certain reverends and rabbis, ceo's and stockholders, foundations and trusts, and secret societies - bought it all. We KNEW.

Can we come up with a dozen Wildkerson's - people at the top who have come forward - later rather than sooner?

I think we should place all the blame on Mz. Rice and see if anyone comes to her rescue.

Always remember, it wasn't a war except on tv and in speeches. It was a criminal act that was never prosecuted within the rule of law - live criminals are walking around and living in nice houses.

Always remember, dino's participated in the ruse.

Always remember the pain you felt when leaders you liked held hands with the criminals and gave them all their support.

Always remember how the good dems were silenced. I have come to shudder at the word 'hearng'. The only successful hearings in the last twenty years were the ones that led to the impeachment of Clinton - successful because the hate-filled Republicans pulled if off and won. The others have been 'show' and 'pretend'. With this exception: There were questions asked and some answers received that MIGHT prove to be legal clinchers because of lies told or evidence gained. Otherwise, the hearings were all to mollify us - the ones who knew what Ceney and Rumsfeld were doing.


Whatever happens never allow Hamilton to represent Democrats or Specter to represent Republicans on any Commissions - or Bob Kerry and quite a few others.

Whatever happens, let's hope Lindsey Graham will fade away from his .

Whatever happens to Cheney, let's hope that they get him for doing business while a V.P. - especially his business involving nuclear supplies and technology.

This is a sick country. It could sink by its hypocrisy even if the crimes aren't added up. We need to get our people into office - and kick out the Republicans - from the school boards to the supreme court.

We can only try to grow our trust in each other. A war has been declared against us by the consortium of corporations, wall street, foundations-trusts, military, media, reverends and rabbis, secret societies, Federal Society and NED type organizations, Tri-Lateral Commissions and the 'burgers and all the Blackwaters and the killer side of the intelligence divisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
52. It's deja vu all over again.
I swear, we are privy to so much information here -- long before, if ever, the M$M gets hold of it -- that I lose track of when something really becomes NEWS. News in the sense that OTHER people besides us are learning about it.

Unless I'm losing my mind, so much stuff touted as BREAKING of late, was also BREAKING a mere few weeks ago, when a trusted source revealed information on one show or another. Then it hits another publication, usually referring to the initial one, and it's breaking news again.

But it rarely takes hold beyond one or two shows to spread like wildfire.

Maybe we can have a WILDFIRE news alert, to let us know when something finally gains legs.

Funny how the Pelosi story today spread like wildfire and all the other BushCo stuff remain fragmented embers, just waiting to catch fire. Will they?

My sincere appreciation to kpete, babylonsister and others who keep us posted as things hit the intertubes and other media. This OP isn't a reflection of the above at all. I'm just making a general observation and venting.

I'm just overloaded, frustrated and frazzled.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
63. November 22, 1963
Vietnam and Iraq Wars Started by Same People

Money to gain power. Power to gain money. And one day, it will all be theirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
70. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pjt7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #70
78. Wilkerson is the man
we need to see more of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
77. Cheney, in particular, should be in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
81. Toture Generated False Alarms of Attacks
Edited on Fri May-15-09 07:44 AM by JPZenger
The Red Cross quoted one tortured guy as saying that he made up phony planned attacks to try to get the torture to stop. He said that led to false alarms of attacks.

Remember about 3 or 4 years ago when there were front page headlines that the terrorists were planning to blow up Prudential Insurance in Newark, New Jersey? "Yes, we will blow up the infidel insurance company."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #81
82. Powell Speaks Through Wilkerson?
There is a feeling that when Wilkerson speaks, it is really coming from Colin Powell. Wilkerson is very loyal to Powell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
84. which points back at Bush's Lies for Attacking Iraq
Edited on Fri May-15-09 09:09 AM by fascisthunter
yes there was a conspiracy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
85. We can't let them get away with making Pelosi the center of attention right now.
The reason they're doing it is so obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #85
87. lotsa luck getting people not to watch the shiny shiny
when we get that skill down, we really will run this country again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #87
90. It's an uphill battle, that's for sure.
Worth fighting though. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #90
92. yeah, if you need more
:banghead:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC