Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I don't give a flying fugg about Nancy Pelosi

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:55 PM
Original message
I don't give a flying fugg about Nancy Pelosi
Edited on Thu May-14-09 03:55 PM by malaise
I want the war criminals in chief brought to book. Call their bluff Nancy.

Poor Cliff May is about to pop a blood vessel on GEM$NBC. Damn they're scared shitless.
The noose is tightening. Cliff May's face is blood red.

add
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. yeah, I'm no Pelosi fan
she's been a source of near constant disappointment.

War criminals must stand trial in the US, or face trials elsewhere in the world (like Spain).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ditto
This is about Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and the other goons from the Bushco administration.
I do not intent to be sidetracked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Hannity is absolutely giddy over the possible downfall of Pelosi
as if her leaving the Speaker's post would destroy the democratic party and the pub takeover would commence.
If she vacates, then Hello Speaker Murtha or Speaker Kuscinich. How 'ya like them apples Sean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Hannity, Sir, is Being More Delusional Than Usual
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nor Does The Country, Ma'am: The Criminality Resides With the Bush Administration Solely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. 100% correct Mr Magistrate
Sir :hi:

As Tweety starts out 'Spreading the blame'. That's all that's going on here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I hope you're being funny, malaise...
:dilemma:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I want the chief suspects bobthedrummer and I am
dead serious. Whoever else is taken down in the process is gravy. I want the fugging meat - Cheney, Rumsfeld, Bush, the lawyers and the other goons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I'm together with that starting at the top, Cheney/Rumsfeld/Gonzales saving Bush for special handlin
but I don't give a fugg about this party loyalty shit when all the parties are full of corruption and cronies that failed US
:fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
36. We agree on everything then
Edited on Thu May-14-09 05:21 PM by malaise
Do not forget as Hoyer is reminding us that the Republican Congress refused to veto Bush and override the anti-torture Bill. I want the meat.
sp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You're wrong again, members of the 109th &110th Congress share in it-they failed US eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. They Committed No Crime, Sir, And Are Not Responsible For The Acts Of the Criminals
Prosecuting the crime of torturing prisoners in custody is all that concerns me in this matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Commision and Omision
read on it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. There Is Mortal And Venial As Well, Ma'am: What Is Your Point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. They have commited crimes, by commision and omision
that is the point

This should not be partisan... but but, my side... my side my ass... this is not a football game.

But count on it, prosecution my ass. The empire comes first.

All this is smoke and mirrors, pure and simple... and those who defend any of these people has no clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. They Have Committed No Crime Under Any Law, Ma'am
Members of the Bush administration, however, certainly did commit the crime, under U.S. and international law, of torturing prisoners in custody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. They failed to uphold their oath to preserve, protect and defend our Constitution collectively eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Mere Noise, Sir, And No Crime Even If It Had Substance
They behaved differently than you would prefer: unless you are King, that is no crime....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Actually yes it is, if they KNEW torture was happenng
and they didn't do a thing to stop it, it is a cover up.

I know we want to think that it hasn't happened, but it has. It may even be aiding and abetting

You know like the driver of the get away car in a robbery, if you need an obvious example. So yes, we should have an independent prosecutor (won't happen) and a grand jury convened (won't happen) and indictments where they deserve to be given, (won't happen).

At this point we all can say there are two systems of justice in the US. The one for the little people and the one for the well connected. Not necessarily the well heeled, the well-connected.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. No, Ma'am: No Law States Any Such Thing
People can only be held accountable for not exercising authority they possess in a matter such as this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. You also know that you cannot use the secrecy act to hide
crimes. Something going back to the Pentagon Papers...

Just thought I'd mention this for you

Now if you excuse me, putting my country before my party takes priority in my life. If in your case cheering my team on is all that matters, then you are a good Imperial subject. I am not, I am a citizen. It is work, and at times places me at odds with the cheer leaders (on both sides of the aisle) but oh well. I take citizenship very seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. That Was An Odd Decision, Ma'am
Worth reading in full. The circumstance was very different, of course, being a grand jury inquiry into the disclosure of the items to the public before Sen. Gravel's aide was summoned, but while it stated there could be no prosecution result from a legislator's reading classified items on the floor, it expressly stated anyone who reported what was read outside the chamber was liable to prosecution for disclosing classified information. Thus, had then Rep. Pelosi made the desired speech, anyone who retailed it to the public would have been up on charges, and without a shred of legal defense. One is irresistibly reminded of the query concerning a tree falling in the forest....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Again are yuo a citizen or a cheerleader
and the decision stands

By the way citizens QUESTION

Subjects (and cheerleaders) follow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Pretensions Of Moral Superiority, Ma'am, Will Get You Nowhere
They do not even amuse....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Ok where did I read this meme before?????
Oh yes, Free Republic and the AOL boards back in the day.

Look in the mirror magistrate... all the ugly stuff people said about the other side and their willingness to put party before country are here now.

Again, citizens questions, subjects follow, pretty simple

And it is not moral superiority. But some of us take our citizenship far more seriously than any party or elected representative.

And yes, if they knew a crime was committed and chose to do nothing, they had an out...

It might not have been comfortable. They may have faced jail time... but people are truly tested in their mettle in situations like that. Hell in the real world where I live those who do the right thing are not even rewarded most of the time... but that is the real world... but doing the right thing has its own rewards.

They chose not to... their choice...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Far Below Your Usual Standard, Ma'am
"If sainthood was common, who would revere a saint?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. read some on this citizenship shtickj
The government is us; we are the government, you and I.
Theodore Roosevelt

Character, in the long run, is the decisive factor in the life of an individual and of nations alike.
Theodore Roosevelt

All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.
Thomas Jefferson

Conquest is not in our principles. It is inconsistent with our government.
Thomas Jefferson

Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves are its only safe depositories.
Thomas Jefferson


There are more where those come from...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Of No Relevance, Ma'am, To The Question At Hand, Namely Who Bears Criminal Liability
Cheney, Bush, various lesser functionaries of that administration of the Executive, do: no one else, anywhere, does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Yes it does, because it includes some of our people
and this is not a partisan issue

The chain of criminality goes from the top... the President of the United States, to the lowest level trooper who obeyed orders (didn't Nuremberg throw that out?)

So if you are to be a citizen, you are to demand prosecution and trials for all involved. From the top... all the way to those who obeyed orders

It matters little what letter is behind their name or what they were doing at the time.

The level of guilt is different from person to person, but this is not a partisan matter. You are making it partisan... but it is not.

Don't worry, your precious dems will be protected, with your precious Repigss, because gosh darn it we are the US... and we will not demand that what needs to be done is done... because we as a nation are rotten to the core.

So your choice is to make this a partisan matter, which you are doing, or a matter of ethics and character.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Nonesense, Ma'am: No Criminal Liability Exists In the Legislature Over This
The chain of command, as you may note even from your own phrasings, does not include the Congress where acts of the Executive's organs are involved. If you do not like various Democratic members of Congress for various reasons, that is one thing, but maintaining they are criminally liable for the acts of the Bush administration is nonesense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. What part of you cannot use the secrecy act to hide a crime
are you obtusely missing?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. The Part, Ma'am, That Opens Criminal Liability Under Any Known Theory Of Law
Something you have not come close to providing, any more than you have engaged the substance of the Court ruling you are brandishing in making the statement above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. Whatever, you go on telling that to yourself
and be a partisan, we are done.

For the millions who have died when good men have refused to speak...

For the millions more who have lost all when good men have refused to scream.

For the millions more that will die, because people still refuse to do what is right.

You go on.

Forgive me for not joining you in the cheering alley.

I will be at the corner, weeping... we have not learned... we humans never learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Spoken like a loyal Democratic Party neoliberal, but again you're wrong-get used to the "noise" eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. So You Accuse Me Of Being A Democrat, Sir? The Horror....
Will it be possible for me to hold up my head in public henceforth? A DEMOCRAT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #29
38. Actually I'd use another term, a partisan
and I would not be holding my head high on that charge, but that is just me.

This is about the law, are we a nation of laws, or a nation of hypocrites?

I know the answer, and what is staring back from that mirror is utter hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #29
57. lol, nope, it's the neoliberal bullying part that sticks-but nice try ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. Could You Define Neo-Liberal, Sir?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. You
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. Surely, Sir, You Have A List Of Policy Positions, Stands On Issues, Common To This Demon Du Jour?
"I hate flattery, especially that awkward kind you have to work to believe."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #59
62. So, Sir, Coming On Twenty-Four Hours, You Cannot Provide a Coherent Definition?
Edited on Fri May-15-09 06:58 PM by The Magistrate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. The issue is (as Shultz is saying)
This is their -Bushco policy
Torture was a Bush policy - who gave the orders.
I don't care who goes down with them but they are my only interest at this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
42. Here's the thing
Edited on Thu May-14-09 05:40 PM by me b zola
Those who conspired and ordered the crimes are using this as a way to evade responsibility. Every mainstream news source, with very few notable exceptions, are still "debating" on their pages and airwaves if A) torture is illegal, B) if what the bush* administration ordered is torture, and C) even if it is illegal "so what" if it was done to "terrorists" or to protect Americans.

These news sources persist in acting as though there is a debate about those issues, that it is very likely that what the bush* administration has done was okay and the matter should be dropped. At the same time they are running with the "what did Nancy know and when did she know it" gop talking point. If they aren't sure and aren't going to pursue the crimes of the bush* administration, then WTF does it matter what Nancy knew and when did she know it?--except to obfuscate the issue and to divide US?

Make the goppers admit that torture occurred, that it is illegal, and that it did not keep us safer before we sacrifice someone who may or may not have been briefed on the matter after the fact.

Don't let them divide us. Don't let them hide behind smoke and mirrors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Hear Hear, Ma'am!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. Absolutely correct
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. And the 108th. They sat out the Taguba hearings with hardly a peep.
But, first things first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Yep, yet there is a certain priority-thanks for reminding me Beth...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. her knowledge or not, does not decriminalize one thing bu$h*/cheney did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. It is that simple
Give me the meat - Special Prosecutor time. Cheney and his sidekick Rumsfeld are going down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgolfer Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Pelosi and the Repugs
Pelosi is finding out that trying to play nice with Republicans is a waste of time.
They will rip her apart if she doesn't get a spine on this. She needs to open this
whole thing up with a House investigation and let the chips fall where they may.

Between Reid and Pelosi, I don't know which one lets the Repugs railroad them the most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. i haven't heard one 'pundit' ask, 'what did bu$h* know and when did he know it?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. It's like he never existed. Isn't that weird? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. Listen to Ed Shultz' OP ED
on now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. 100% Correct
I will not pay attention to obfuscation and diversion at this time.

This is about the Bush Executive branch of Government. If members of Congress go down with them, so be it but I want Bushco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMachineWins Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
30. Agreed, Pelosi answered all these questions years ago
It's a completely desperate move by a dying republican party to avoid being charged with war crimes which, they will be tried for anyway if the majority of Americans have any say in our so-called democracy anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
31. I'd forgive her if she would just put single payer on the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Just heard a clip that Obama doesn't want single payer right now.
I don't think the congress will pass something Obama doesn't want. He said it would be too big a change to up heave a sixth of the economy right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##



This week is our second quarter 2009 fund drive.
Donate and you'll be automatically entered into our daily contest.
New prizes daily!



No purchase or donation necessary. Void where prohibited. Click here for more information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #33
55. I agree with Grovelbot n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PopSixSquish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
47. Ok, For the Sake of Argument - If Nancy Pelosi Did Know...
Edited on Thu May-14-09 06:00 PM by PopSixSquish
and did what some folks here have suggested and stood on the floor of the House of Representatives and read this into the record, what would have happened?

Fall 2002 - one year from 9/11, one year from the anthrax attacks, troops on the ground in Afghanistan, the run-up to Iraq taking place...

Does anyone HONESTLY think that things would have changed?

The news about Bush/Rice and the August 6th memo and other security briefings came out and we got "Nobody thought that they would fly planes into buildings".

The news came out that Bush probably did go AWOL during his National Guard days and Dan Rather got fired.

The abuses at Abu Ghraib came out and Bush was re-elected President.

Do you want to know who is complicit in torture and war crimes? The news media who lapped up the the bullshit the Bush administration shoveled at them like a kitten with a bowl of cream.

Nancy Pelosi would have been pilloried from one end of this country to the other by the Republicans and the news media. Remember the Dixie Chicks and that comment was nothing.

I don't care about Nancy Pelosi. I want Bush and Cheney and all of the reporters who should have asked more questions and should have followed up on what they did know. I want them to do the perp walk. They are the ones who have blood on their hands.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #47
56. No it wouldn't have changed anything... except...
she might have kept her soul...

This is all if what they say is true and she turned a blind eye. I will wait to hear all the facts, then the guilty can go to prison and the compliant can lose their damn jobs. Sorry, but if someone is wiling to hide something like that so they can keep their power, their position and their money then they don't need to be representing the people of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #47
61. Good post
As expected Nancy Pelosi is the only game in town on GEM$NBC this morning.

More obfuscation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC