Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ben Nelson Tougher On Obama's Nominees Than Bush's

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:49 PM
Original message
Ben Nelson Tougher On Obama's Nominees Than Bush's

#1 if push come to shove I hope Obama does her as a recess appointee. #2 When the hell is he going to counter punch Nelson?

“Sen. Ben Nelson's opposition to President Obama's choice to head the Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel appears to be the key obstacle to her confirmation. Democrats say Dawn Johnsen, an Indiana University law professor, has 59 backers in the Senate -- just one vote shy of cloture. Nelson, a Nebraska Democrat, is standing firmly against her appointment, pointing to Johnsen's job 15 years ago as a counsel to the abortion rights group NARAL.

All of which has left Nelson's critics furious. Where was the principled opposition from the Senator during the Bush years? Why is he refusing to show Obama the same deference that he offered the previous administration?

The votes, they argue tell the story. Nelson supported cloture or confirmation for some of Bush's most controversial judges and political nominees, including several who were never able to be confirmed even under a GOP-controlled Senate. Moreover, Nelson often defended his positions by citing presidential prerogative.

"The president's nominees, especially to the Supreme Court, deserve an up-or-down vote," he said of the nominating process, "even if the nominee isn't popular with the special-interest groups in Washington."cont…

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/14/ben-nelson-tougher-on-oba_n_203447.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. I call his office every chance I get an tell his staff what a loser he is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oh good for you.
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Are You One Of His Constituents?
If yes...then fabulous. If not they'll probably ignore you, sorry to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's still good
to do. Even if they pretend to ignore someone, they are keeping track of how many people they ignore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Good Point Pond Master
Edited on Thu May-14-09 05:00 PM by Me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. There is a good reason
why the Bill of Rights protects a citizen's right to file complaints with elected officials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. No I am not, but it deflates their world anyhow
Edited on Thu May-14-09 05:03 PM by graywarrior
Plus, they never ask me where I live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. The man is an ugly and corrupt human being
who reflects very poorly on his state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. it's all good though
because he's from a red state, and we need him...

AMIRITE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. This kind of behavior doesn't win human reincarnation, Ben. Happy karma.
He has enough to tip the pot the other way, I'd think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. Folks don't realize that the obstacles to the key DOJ positions
work to allow the Bush appointed US Attorneys to continue with their crap. How can Obama appoint new US Attorneys to the state positions if he can't get these key positions filled? Holder and Obama will want their input when they vet the possible nominees for the state US Attorney offices.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Precisely
She's a good candidate and I hope Obama holds onto her and does the recess appointment thing if necessary. Nelson should be careful. He has a big thing for having scholarships go through Nebraska's banks and Obama says he's going to put an end to that. Fingers crossed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. it sounds to me that nelson
is what they call a DINO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
15. Nelson might vote against confirmation but for cloture, which would be fine
Getting the simple majority for confirmation will be no problem. The issue is whether we can bring the nomination to that "up-or-down vote" that was such a mantra on the right when it was their stooge who was doing the nominating.

With regard to Nelson and Johnsen, Sargent noted that Senators sometimes vote for cloture (the vote that counts, in many instances) but then vote against confirmation, to be on record as opposing it. Sargent added:

So I asked Nelson’s spokesperson whether this also meant he was leaning towards a No vote on cloture. His response: “He hasn’t decided yet, but he usually votes for cloture, as he is against obstruction and believes it is important for each issue to get an up or down vote.”

So this isn’t quite as bad for Johnsen, but Nelson is still validating the criticisms, and could vote No on cloture, too.


(You can read Sargent's full post .)

Obviously, Johnsen would have the full support of any real Democrat, not to mention any real public servant with a shred of human decency. Nevertheless, if Nelson votes for cloture, I won't get too excited about his subsequent vote against confirmation. Priorities, doncha know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
16. I think this guy is worse than Lieberman if that's even
possible.

Really sickening.

:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC