Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fallen Las Vegas cop was driving 109MPH with no lights or siren

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:00 PM
Original message
Fallen Las Vegas cop was driving 109MPH with no lights or siren
"We didn't interview the secondary officer because it was a traumatic event"....good gravy, but they certainly arrested the civilian driver and smeared his name accross the news. The "secondary officer" is Stuart Bowman. He is the one who told secondary responders the lights and sirens were on. (He also turned his own lights and sirens on AFTER the accident.)


=====

In the moments before officer James Manor plowed into a pickup attempting a left turn, he was driving his patrol car 109 mph without flashing lights or siren, Clark County Sheriff Doug Gillespie said Wednesday.

The speed was the equivalent of traveling the length of a football field in about two seconds. It gave Manor little time to avoid hitting Calvin Darling's truck May 7. At the time of impact, after braking and trying to steer out of the way, Manor was still driving 90 mph.

Gillespie called Manor's speed in the 45-mph zone on Flamingo Road "excessive and unsafe," even if his lights and siren had been on. The facts of the accident probably will alter the charges Darling faces, the sheriff said.

"The facts that we have I think certainly change the charges that are there," a stern Gillespie said in an afternoon news conference. "We do believe his speed was a significant factor in what took place in this accident. So yes, we are looking at those original charges."...

The information about the lack of lights and siren on Manor's patrol car reversed what Gillespie first said after the accident. The sheriff initially was adamant that Manor and an officer in a second patrol car were on their way to a call with lights and sirens on.

The investigation now shows that the second officer also was not running lights or a siren,Gillespie said. The second officer's speed has not been determined.

Gillespie said that when he addressed the media many hours after the accident, he had been given incorrect information by first responders to the crash. They said Manor and the second officer had their lights and sirens on.

"They were there right after it, and they thought that that's what they were told," the sheriff said. "And we didn't interview the secondary officer right away because it was a very traumatic event."

The department will review and change how it collects and releases information after fatal accidents involving officers, Gillespie said. He said the department wasn't considering disciplinary action against those officers who relayed the information.

http://www.lvrj.com/news/breaking_news/45619762.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Jeeeeeeeeez.........
......:puke: I hate bullshit like this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudbase Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. If it's confirmed that Bowman was lying,
he should be fired and have his certification(s) revoked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. The cop wasn't wearing a seat belt either..
One hundred and nine miles per hour, no lights, no siren, no seat belt..

:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm sorry the officer died, but there are two important issues here which can't be ignored
#1 is that the police need to find a balance between getting there quickly and the safety of the public and themselves.

#2 is charging a citizen with DUI and the accident when the cause was clearly the behavior of the officer involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. This type of accident is why if I am first in line and the light turns
Edited on Thu May-21-09 09:28 PM by MadMaddie
green I wait until cross traffic is actually stopped. Sometimes you can't gauge the actual speed of the oncoming cars.

It's too bad a life was lost. I am glad the department came clean though another mans life was close to being destroyed.

Maybe I missed it but was the officer going to a call? If not why was he speeding like this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. He was indeed going to a domestic violence call.
Usually this type of recklessness has happened pursuing other vehicles, not answering calls, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I could see if he didn't have the sirens on but not to have the lights
on and going through an intersection is a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC