Cheney's speech contained omissions, misstatements

[meegbear]

Former Vice President Dick Cheney's defense Thursday of the Bush administration's policies for interrogating suspected terrorists contained omissions, exaggerations and misstatements.

In his address to the American Enterprise Institute , a conservative policy organization in Washington , Cheney said that the techniques the Bush administration approved, including waterboarding — simulated drowning that's considered a form of torture — forced nakedness and sleep deprivation, were "legal" and produced information that "prevented the violent death of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of innocent people."

He quoted the Director of National Intelligence, Adm. Dennis Blair , as saying that the information gave U.S. officials a "deeper understanding of the al Qaida organization that was attacking this country."

In a statement April 21 , however, Blair said the information "was valuable in some instances" but that "there is no way of knowing whether the same information could have been obtained through other means. The bottom line is that these techniques hurt our image around the world, the damage they have done to our interests far outweighed whatever benefit they gave us and they are not essential to our national security."

A top-secret 2004 CIA inspector general's investigation found no conclusive proof that information gained from aggressive interrogations helped thwart any "specific imminent attacks," according to one of four top-secret Bush-era memos that the Justice Department released last month.

FBI Director Mueller Robert Muller told Vanity Fair magazine in December that he didn't think that the techniques disrupted any attacks.

<snip>

Click the link for the full article and list of omissions, exaggerations and misstatements.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20090521/pl_mcclatchy/3237981

[Blue Meany]

1. Who would believe evidence ginned up by Cheney anyway?

The "proof" he claims to have, and wants declassified, is a report from his own office files, that he probably requested be written to cover himself and his cronies. Why would competent journalists take this guy seriously? He has a record of twisting intelligence to reach the conclusions he wants, and has been proven wrong about every significant assertion in relation to the "War on Terror": WMD, the Sadam-9/11 connection, etc.

[Orrex]

2. If Iraqi agents had water boarded Cheney in an effort to preempt the firebombing of Falluja

Thereby saving countless thousands of innocent lives, would Cheney still be as cavalier about it?

[UTUSN]

3. K&R #1 for you beat me to it. Had already done the Googling, excerpting n/t