|
if there's a location where it's not profitable to open a store, then the people who live there don't have a nearby store. if there's an address that fedex deems to costly to service, they won't deliver there.
free marketeers would say that in the long run, people who live in these remote regions (such as inner cities :sarcasm:) either move or are compensated for the lack of service through the value or cost of the land or other local amenities.
that works well enough when you're talking about pizza delivery, but not so much when you're talking about health care.
people without insurance lack insurance because the free market has deemed them unprofitable. the free market is literally saying it's more efficient to train surgeons to do elective cosmetic procedures for rich people than to save lives of poor people. and people who get elective cosmetic procedures are voting with their dollars, again, to steer surgeons away from saving the lives of poor people.
i don't mind the free market when it comes to allocation of EXCESS resources, e.g., quality-of-life and elective procedures. but basic preventative, corrective, restorative, emergency, and life-saving care OUGHT to be treated as a basic human right.
what REALLY drives the point home is that we ALL benefit from this. the rich person who enjoys elective surgery might later contract anfectious disease from a contagious poor person who couldn't afford proper treatment. WE ALL BENEFIT from universal health care.
|