Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lessons I learned from talking to an Ayn Randian

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:52 PM
Original message
Lessons I learned from talking to an Ayn Randian
Edited on Mon Jun-15-09 03:55 PM by Taverner
I had the privlige, nay OPPORTUNITY to talk with a real live Ayn Randian over coffee today.

Here's what I, the lowly government dependent (although I have a job, he does not) learned...

1 - The poor should pay more in taxes (if taxes are to be paid at all) because they use more services

2 - The poor should pay more for goods because they are responsible for their own poverty, and by being poor they hurt the rest of us

3 - The rich should get government handouts, if any handouts are to be given, because the rich are who built America, and who employ us and were the visionaries who came up with all the things we take for granted.

4 - If the poor starve or die it should be no concern of ours. They chose to be poor, and just suck off the public teat all day.

5 - We need to bring back mandatory sterilization and use it on the poor

6 - The rich need to be venerated as royalty because they are the brain of America. The poor need to be eliminated because they are a virus or cancer, on the body American

7 - Iraq is only bad because we were unsucessful in taking the land and oil from them. They aren't using their resources wisely, so we should kill them all and move alpha males and females onto the land instead.

8 - Israel should be supported because they bully Palestine. Bullies are the visionaries of America. We should only stop support if they show weakness.

9 - The US Anti-Bully campaign will destroy our youth. America needs bullies or everyone will think they can do whatever they want.

10 - That AYN RAND IS A FUCKING PSYCHOPATH!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. And this idiot doesn't have a job?
Does the irony not penetrate the extra-thick skull or what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Of course not
Because the guy was not "unemployed" but "self-employed" now. Oh he still collects Unemployment, but he puts all of his energies into "starting his own business"

Denial...denial...denial...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. shouldn't he be "eliminated" for collecting unemployment?
Why doesn't he do the right thing, and eliminate himself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chollybocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
50. I hope you didn't have to pay for his coffee.
Not a good tipper, I bet. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
43. Sounds like a certain plumber....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
85. I would have gut shot him, the fucker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. "The rich should get government handouts, if any handouts are to be given..."
Isn't this the policy of the last two administrations? Old Ayn is in the mainstream, now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yep
"Fuck the Poor" as national policy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. ayn rand was not in favor of "handouts" to anyone, but she WAS for total deregulation...
Edited on Mon Jun-15-09 04:35 PM by pepperbear
the "lite" version of her "Objectivist" philosophy is that individual achievement and artistic integrity should be revered above all else, and any kind, ANY KIND of intrusion from the government OR EVEN INTRUSION FROM THE PERSON WHO MIGHT BE PAYING FOR YOUR ART is tantamount to totaliterianism. It is an extreme sort of libertarianism (what I would call "neo-liberalism") as seen through the eyes of someone who had actually experienced Soviet-style communism. She was a social liberal, an anti-racist.....and very much into letting the J Paul Gettys of the world do whatever the hell they wanted. Limousine liberals and the Hollywood types adored her.

The problem was her failure to take human nature into account. Consequently, according to her philosophy, altruism became an unfortunate byproduct of the weak welfare state.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
checks-n-balances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #33
73. Good post, except 'Limousine liberal' is a rightwing slogan
Part of that "two-word culture" (brought to my consciousness by Ed Schultz) manufactured over the past 30 years by rightwing think tanks. For example, how many times did we hear the two-word tag "Brutal Dictator" before the 2003 Iraq invasion?

It may seem like I'm quibbling, but the first people I remember using that term were Phyllis Schlafly and her ilk during the 1970's; I don't remember a Democrat, Liberal, or Progressive type thinker ever using it.

Just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. LOL That kind of thinking gave us the Communist revolutions of the early 20th century.
Fuck the poor too much and they will rise up. The Rich should pay more in taxes because the Government is the only thing standing in between them and the pitchforks (to paraphrase Obama.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
41. Rand's family fled the USSR because of the revolution.
Some people never learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cannabis_flower Donating Member (386 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
78. Something I always say..
whenever the words "class warfare" comes up is "That is not class warfare, class warfare would be if poor people actually marched down to River Oaks (insert local insanely rich area) with pitchforks and torches and started looting and burning, that would be class warfare"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. And he made you buy his coffee, didn't he?
Just a guess, but I'm pretty sure I'm right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flakey_foont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Crikey!
That is some serious delusional ranting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dem629 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. You have far more patience than I. I couldn't talk to a crazy Randian for five seconds.
Kudos!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Honestly, I thought he was hilarious
He didn't but I did

He was a fucking nutjob
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ayn Rand is Scientology for selfish pricks.
Supported by the selfish delusion that because they "contribute" to society they deserve more from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life
"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs."

-- Kung Fu Monkey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Nice.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. oh, I like that....
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Praise Yog-Sothoth, I read Lord of the Rings
Also tons and tons of Lovecraft.
I never read Ayn Rand, and I never will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
36. I read "Atlas Shrugged" but
it must not of penetrated what it was about..I read it in my 20's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. It's incomprehensibly BAD literature - trust me. And I say this as a former
fan of Ayn Rand's and a former Libertarian (30 or so years ago).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
38. Oh that's wonderful!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
61. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #10
67. That is fantastic!
Thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
margotb822 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
81. Definitely forwarded this to a friend
Hilarious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. You had lunch with Ann Coulter?
Strong stomach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
80. Thanks for my laugh of the day. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. According to that idiot's philosophy, you would have been justified in
knocking their teeth out and stealing their wallet. After all, bullies rule!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I know, huh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Plus, if he doesn't work could one conclude that he's one those "parasites"
Edited on Mon Jun-15-09 04:16 PM by Guy Whitey Corngood
he complains about? If you take his argument to its logical conclusion then one could in theory do the rest of society a favor and "get rid" of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kooljerk666 Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
48. Actually you are right..........
Edited on Mon Jun-15-09 06:00 PM by kooljerk666
Stomp the shit out of them & deride them if they need law enforcement to save their life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. I only learned one lesson from talking to an Ayn Randian
1. Don't talk to Ayn Randians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. You know....
One of the things that finally caused me to start rethinking the whole Libertarian way of thinking was the sheer number of Ayn Rand worshippers in the LP, and their entire "Screw social liberties, economic liberty uber allies!" attitude.

There are times I jokingly call myself a "recovering Libertarian"..... :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Deep down, I am an anarchist
But I don't think now and here is the time for it....Homo Sapien has to evolve a little first...

So I'm a Democrat :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. The only difference between libertarianism and communism
is that communism at least made sense on paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
armyowalgreens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #27
57. Both are extremely similar on paper. But in reality, they are the exact opposites.
Edited on Tue Jun-16-09 03:17 AM by armyowalgreens
Anarcho-libertarianism is the most extreme form of individualism. Anarcho-communism is the most extreme form of anti-individualism or absolute community.

Both seem to function very well on paper. But in the real world of chaos, both would lead to failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. Did the guy look like this by any chance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Commonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
22. Please forward this...
...to you Randian acquaintance:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
84. lol that never gets old
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
23. one wonders what neil peart ever saw in her and her half baked philososophy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheltiemama Donating Member (892 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
25. Oh, dear.
I don't think he's thought this through. If he doesn't have a job, he will end up poor. And according to him, the poor should be eliminated.

Then again, taking him out of the gene pool might not be the worst idea ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
28. LOL!!! That Randian is my former business partner!!! I know that dude!
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

:spray:

The Randians drink their kool-aid deeply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
29. I recommend a viewing of The Fountainhead...
...based on Ms. Rand's novel of the same name, and quite possibly the silliest movie ever made.
Certainly the silliest Gary Cooper movie ever made. Watch it with friends, and shriek with laughter.
Or not...considering how Ayn Randian our beloved country has become in recent years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Is that the one where every line of dialogue is a soliloquy ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #29
65. LOL its the worst screenplay ever written!
she wrote the screenplay..
the ending is worth the whole thing, as Patricia Neal ascends on a little elevator, her scarf flying in the breeze, to meet Gary Cooper as he stands on the top of his large architectural penis..er...building, as his little woman rises to meet him at the top
i laughed and laughed and laughed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #29
68. It is a comedy classic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
30. As DU's resident Ayn Rand Apologist, I declare this fellow didn't understand...
what he was talking about. Ayn Rand didn't really distinguish between Rich and Poor. Her primary distinguisher was something more like Talent versus Mediocrity. And, she had no particular animosity towards the mediocre masses. Her main desire was that the mediocre "not get in the way of the talented." She worshiped Talent, not Wealth.

She was, however, still wrong. The idea that the mediocre were given too much authority over the Talented was mostly a colossal straw man argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #30
51. Thats what I took away from her stuff too.
Edited on Mon Jun-15-09 10:56 PM by juno jones
Horribly written stuff, I pooped out mid-Fountainhead, having worked my way up from Anthem to Atlas Shrugged. I kept reading trying to find out what the hoopla was about.

She had a way of cudgeling a theme unto death...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #30
56. Quite ironic... the mediocre "not get in the way of the talented."
Considering that her mediocre writing is still selling better than Hemmingway, Steinbeck, Fitzgerald and Capote. Truly getting in the way.:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
checks-n-balances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #56
74. Makes ya wonder what she would've thought of GWB n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #30
82. I am almost ashamed to admit I was a randian Objectivist for some time.
Until the self-serving nature of objectivism became apparent through the effects on my own family,through unemployment,military service,mental illness,public works.Ayn Rand lived in a rarified fishbowl,with few being allowed in it.I look back and find it hard to believe I believe that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
32. Really? I never even
knew what an Ann Rander believed..wasn't curious enough to look it up..but, from the captions around here I didn't think it would good.

But, this?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
34. To Ayn Rand, Altruism is verboten. "The Virtue of Selfishness"
is Randian Bible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Not exactly so...
She had nothing against charity, but did not feel that it should be mandated. She was of the (incorrect) opinion that govt support of collective welfare projects was a major source of the world's problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #39
49. "...the morality of self-sacrifice is the morality of death."
"...the morality of self-sacrifice is the morality of death."
Atlas Shrugged.

Seems to me she had a particular bone to pick with altruism for its own sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #49
66. Here is Rand, explaining her view of charity:
"My views on charity are very simple. I do not consider it a major virtue and, above all, I do not consider it a moral duty. There is nothing wrong in helping other people, if and when they are worthy of the help and you can afford to help them. I regard charity as a marginal issue. What I am fighting is the idea that charity is a moral duty and a primary virtue."

http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=faq_index#obj_q7

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
armyowalgreens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #39
55. She was most certainly against charity for charities sake.
She despised personal sacrifice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #39
63. correct
but it's also much more nuanced than that. The idea that providing collective welfare would cause some people to stop even trying to be self sufficient was an immaturity in the philosophy. We know from the card game of life that the joker is our very own unpredictability. Rand wanted human nature to be predictable enough that you could easily categorize people as 100% responsible for their own life situation, or else 100% in control of it.

The fact of reality is that we all have free will and building a philosophy on providence, chance and one's uber-alphaness is not remarkably different than building a philosophy on monarchy and divine right.

Nevertheless the principles ARE worth thinking about. We interfere with natural selection when we interfere to help what would ordinarily be bad genetic outcomes to survive and re-integrate into the gene pool. From a social perspective the poor tend to have more children to compensate but that higher birthrate doesn't change with advanced medical care and additional nutrition. There IS a culture of poverty whether anyone wants to believe it or not. Some people get ahead because they're willing to climb over other people's backs to do it - that doesn't mean they "deserve" to be ahead, or the people they have climbed over "deserve" to be behind.

Ayn Rand was an idealist who could have used some basic understanding from Wolfram's cellular automata, math models showing chaotic perturbations, and other demonstrations of equilibria. You cannot have alpha's if everyone is an alpha. Ultimately the idea that the individual is completely responsible for his or herself is a fantastic idea. It means that we rely on contracts, implied and real, for our social interaction, and that defines the terms of trade, for food, for income, for every one of our interactions with each other.

Imagine if you got paid for every hour you work instead of salary for 60 hours a week and occasional weekends. Unfortunately, Ayn Rand never got all the way there - she wanted a more nuanced society but delivered some barbaric ideas - some of them hyperbolic to stimulate discussion, and some of them out of pace with reality. But there are gems in there too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
35. thom hartmann has one on every monday. great fun.
thom hands him his ass every single monday, but he thinks he won, so he keeps coming back. sorta like a lava lamp, but for your ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
37. That "philosophy" is a piece of work, isn't it? I have found discussion impossible...
... with Libertarians.

Hekate


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
40. And now, here's "The Fountainhead" in 5 seconds.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeteytehMawnstar Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
42. Comment number 30 totally got it,
Edited on Mon Jun-15-09 04:43 PM by PeteytehMawnstar
this guy doesn't know what he's talking about. If anything, he's a bush corporatist. A friend of mine was living with a guy who was a Randian. He had copies of the Objectivist newsletter, and wanted to buy my own old 1960 torn version of Atlas shrugged. I probably could have made a few bucks, but I'm territorial over my books. I never had a crazy conversation with him, but i know he didn't support Bush. I'd be skeptical of people who took their marching orders all from one source. Which is what the asshat in the OP sounds like
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
44. He's not a true Randian - they don't believe in taxes at all. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
45. Have they ever heard of Paris Hilton? LOL
6 - The rich need to be venerated as royalty because they are the brain of America. The poor need to be eliminated because they are a virus or cancer, on the body American
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
47. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
52. Most of that sounds like Greenspan.
Who'da thunk it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattSh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
53. And if her so-called philosophy hasn't freaked you out enough yet, read this...
Romancing the Stone-Cold Killer: Ayn Rand and William Hickman

Part One: Ayn Rand's "real man"

Recently I was rereading Scott Ryan's fascinating, albeit highly technical, critique of Ayn Rand's philosophy, Objectivism and the Corruption of Rationality, and getting a lot more out of it the second time, when I came across a fact culled from a posthumous collection of Rand's journal entries.

In her journal circa 1928 Rand quoted the statement, "What is good for me is right," a credo attributed to a prominent figure of the day, William Edward Hickman. Her response was enthusiastic. "The best and strongest expression of a real man's psychology I have heard," she exulted. (Quoted in Ryan, citing Journals of Ayn Rand, pp. 21-22.)

At the time, she was planning a novel that was to be titled The Little Street, the projected hero of which was named Danny Renahan. According to Rand scholar Chris Matthew Sciabarra, she deliberately modeled Renahan - intended to be her first sketch of her ideal man - after this same William Edward Hickman. Renahan, she enthuses in another journal entry, "is born with a wonderful, free, light consciousness -- the absolute lack of social instinct or herd feeling. He does not understand, because he has no organ for understanding, the necessity, meaning, or importance of other people ... Other people do not exist for him and he does not understand why they should." (Journals, pp. 27, 21-22; emphasis hers.)

"A wonderful, free, light consciousness" born of the utter absence of any understanding of "the necessity, meaning, or importance of other people." Obviously, Ayn Rand was most favorably impressed with Mr. Hickman. He was, at least at that stage of Rand's life, her kind of man.

So the question is, who exactly was he?

William Edward Hickman was one of the most famous men in America in 1928. But he came by his fame in a way that perhaps should have given pause to Ayn Rand before she decided that he was a "real man" worthy of enshrinement in her pantheon of fictional heroes.

You see, Hickman was a forger, an armed robber, a child kidnapper, and a multiple murderer.

Other than that, he was probably a swell guy.

And much, much more here... http://michaelprescott.net/hickman.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #53
71. I'm glad to see that someone else knows about that talentless scribbler's hero worship...
of an absolute monster.
"But he's so dreamy!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
armyowalgreens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
54. If humans were in a state of absolute survival, those conditions would work...
But we are not at the edge of death trying to survive. We are a sprawling society with much prosperity. We can afford to and should care for the needy. The expense of doing so is minimal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Longhorn Liberal Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #54
58. Not even in the most dire of survival situations,
whether it be deep inside a tropical rain forest, or the driest desert on Earth, or inside the post-apocalyptic ruins of Los Angeles, would those conditions work.

Those who work together in the harshest environments, who share resources, who help each other, are way more likely to survive than those who only look out for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
armyowalgreens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #58
59. The mind defaults to selfish mode in dire situations...
Edited on Tue Jun-16-09 06:03 AM by armyowalgreens
A situation like the one in the book "The Road" is a perfect example. People who have no emotional connection with each other will literally kill one another for resources if that means surviving.

I'm not saying that you can't overcome that instinct. An emotional connection, like love, would "fight" back those urges. I'm just saying that what Rand talked about is very similar to what animals do in the wild. It deals with the primitive functions of instinct.

What Rand didn't calculate for, and what I'm sure she never actually experienced, was true love and compassion. It's the benefit of being conscious. We can love. I don't know what Rand did, but she did not love anyone else but herself. Which is truly tragic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Locrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
60. strange stuff
Its funny - the most intelligent, wise, "talented" people I know always knew that they didnt know everything. They were smart enough to know just how ignorant they were.

The Ayn Rand types seem to be "ignorant of their ignorance" = that fatal flaw of thinking they know everything when then in fact know so very little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
62. oh jeepers - the stereotypical worst of Ayn Rand
You don't have to swallow the philosophy whole and certainly having it interpreted for you by an unemployed idiot is not a good source of information.

I suggest reading Ayn Rand and deciding for yourself based on first hand knowledge. I'm not a hook line and sinker Randian but there are glimmers of ideas that resonate with me as a pragmatist and individualist.

Ayn Rand never had an opinion on Iraq, for starters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agentS Donating Member (922 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
64. I found the perfect place for a guy like this.
Somalia, which doesn't have a functioning government and operates on barter/anacro-capitalism. Plus the poor die in droves, and it has bullies in the form of pirates.

What are Liber-tard-ians waiting for? This is their Utopia!

Oh I forgot...there are brown people there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
69. I always call them "Rosenbaumians"...since that was her real last name
Fuck her and her adolescent attempt to reimagine some White Russian heritage
Little Alice: "And I will call myself...Ayn Rand!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
70. Ugh. I admire your patience in listening to them at all!
BTW, I hadn't heard of Ayn Rand till I joined DU! She just never had the same influence in the UK. Not that we don't have our own brand of RW-libertarians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
72. According to the rationale for #7, something similar should happen to America's upper class...
which through bad banking errors has led the economy into contraction, which is by definition operation below maximum capacity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
75. And this was all said with a straight face?
I could practice this list for years and still not get through reciting all these lessons without breaking out in hysterical laughter...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
76. Pretty much explains things since November 22, 1963.
It's been pretty much a continuous long slog of war and transfer of wealth from the working and middle classes to the rich and ultra-rich.

At least we got the tee vee, huh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
checks-n-balances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
77. #s 5-9 are absolutely chilling
Edited on Tue Jun-16-09 01:48 PM by checks-n-balances
and, no doubt, are in operation today by at least some of the stealth Powers That Be who have orchestrated the mess we're in today.

Has this guy figured out how the Poor should be "eliminated"? Perhaps by sterilization or starvation?

You're exactly right about #10!!

BTW, here's a clip of Rand on the Donahue show (I saw the original, circa 1978, and it was my intro to her) as she encounters a former admirer of her philosophy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxHdLjIxMhM

If this clip is any indication, she didn't take it well when she wasn't admired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
79. Glad you noticed #10
Quite apart from being deathly dull, wallbangingly preachy and really badly written, Rand's entire body of work consists of finding a faux-moral cover for naked greed. Gordon Gecko made the exact same argument much quicker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-16-09 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
83. 11 - Don't waste your time trying to reason with a Randroid.
Picked up that "Randroid" moniker back in college. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC