Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How come all the repukes in the House, except for 6, voted against funding for Iraq and Afghanistan?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 05:54 AM
Original message
How come all the repukes in the House, except for 6, voted against funding for Iraq and Afghanistan?
Look, I applaud the 32 dems who voted against the war funding. They've all been consistently against the wars. My rep Peter Welch was one of them, and I'm proud that he's representing his contituents. But what about the repukes? Rememeber how the MSM went after dems for votes against funding, sayimg they weren't supporting the troops? Not to mention how the repukes attacked them over it. Now here we are. We KNOW these pukesters aren't against the wars. This is purely political. And the dems and the MSM are silent. Sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Simply because it wasn't presented by bu$h or Cheney
They are obstructionist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. yep. that couldn't be clearer. but where are the dems on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. See what else was in the bill
Some rider no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. I read yesterday that it was in protest because there was no provision
to block photos showing "detainee" abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. ah, thanks. well that gave them a convenient excuse
they would have found another excuse had that not been there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. No.. it was all about funds to IMF..
but it should make it clear to everyone that they put money ahead of soldier's lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. They voted against the IMF bailout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. If they actually thought that bailout might fail, they would have voted for it.
Or if President Bush was still in office they would have voted for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. They only care about getting power back.
If they vote with President Obama on anything, and things go good or bad, then they can't say anything.

But if they vote against him on everything, then they can say how he messed up, even when he doesn't and say they were against it.

Since there entire method is distortion of information through media, it does not matter how often they are wrong, nobody hears about it. It only matters that they get something that they can hope fails, so they can then say they were against it.

They don't care what happens to any people anywhere, they are just being the party of no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Repukes don't support the troops. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. I am disgusted that my "progressive" "anti-war" Democratic Rep John Hall voted for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I don't blame you. I would have been outraged if Peter Welch
had voted for it. I'm wondering if my Senators will stand up and vote against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Sanders will for you. I have Schumer and Gillibrand and know how they'll vote.
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
14. They hate our troops and are totally un-Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. They're always on the wrong side. Now that war is "in"
they're voting against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. Too much money for the IMF in the bill
Edited on Wed Jun-17-09 02:45 PM by librechik
they must stop any charity to brown or black people with funny names or Satan will show their names to Jesus!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC