Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I wonder how many DUers will choose not to use UnRec

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:52 PM
Original message
I wonder how many DUers will choose not to use UnRec
I wonder how many DUers will choose not to use UnRec.

It might seem old-fashioned or "only on principle," sort of like investigating and Impeaching criminal administrations while they are in office; sort of like Rodney King saying "Can't we all just get along;" or remembering "back in the day" when progressive groups worked together and became a Progressive Movement in a Progressive Era.

Not knowing that there was a big issue with what got onto the Greatest Page and being unaware of the now-apparent bitterness about Recommended threads, this change -- and the rock being turned over -- has been a shock.

It's old-fashioned to think of "Recommend" in the traditional way -- as in a gracious recognition of value. Even the word "gracious" is old-fashioned and maybe irrelevant on an Internet discussion board.

It's old-fashioned to view UnRec as being as Orwellian as it is.

Unless you're ahead of your time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Your definition of "Orwellian" is pretty hilarious. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. It's Orwell's definition. UNREC.
Sounds like you're imagining what you think "my definition" is, instead of looking at UnRec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. The whole OP is pretty hilarious.
Rodney King? Impeachment?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Anachronistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Me. This smilie tells how I see the feature...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. LOL
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I think it's unhelpful to get slammed anonymously eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. UnHelpful, UnOpen, UnDone.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes this is just like impeachment of criminal administrations
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. "It might seem old-fashioned or "only on principle......."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Orwellian" = the ability to vote yes or no.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. UnRec. DoublePlusUnGood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Orwellian = walking on egg shells.
Least we might offend the heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
43. Well at least you know where you stand
on eggshells
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. Some. k/u.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Well k/u too!
:hi: :spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. I won't use it.
I hardly ever even recommend unless something is REALLY outstanding. I like to keep things equal. (It's the Libra in me.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Yeah Rec always seemed like a great endorsement, a gold star
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Same here.
Personally, I don't see the point of a 'greatest' page at all.

DU worked fine before the 'greatest' page was introduced. I have the site bookmarked to open to the main discussion page, so I never even see the 'greatest' list.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Me,too.
I don't think I've been to the "greatest" page once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. Call it doubleplusungood if you must
But I have chosen to unrec all threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. "All threads"
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
54. Yup
Even kittens!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. I unrecommended. But I also kicked u back to the top
so I'm sending mixed messages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. I thought you left.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
22. I haven't used it for over 24 hours, and I don't
use the Recommend feature either. I don't care about the Greatest Threads. I probably won't use either half a dozen times per year.

If I have a comment on a thread, I make it in the thread. For example, this thread is superfluous. It's just another anti-unrec thread, containing no new arguments.

That's my comment. I won't be clicking the Unrecommend option on it. I'll leave that to others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. You mean UnUnRec?
"It's just another anti-unrec thread, containing no new arguments."

Wrong. It's not. And the ideas are so new, some can't grasp them. Or old-fashioned.

I accept the change and wondered whether others will also choose to not use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redneck Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
23. Well, I'm definitely unrec'ing every thread whining about unrec'ing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Don't bother, they're all going down the sinkhole anyway............
Oh but I fergot. The UNREC is to make folks like you feel like you have some power.......... :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redneck Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. No, I just find the whining about it ridiculously amusing...
Edited on Fri Jul-10-09 02:50 PM by Redneck Socialist
and the small child in me cackles in glee whenever I get to use a feature that apparently causes peoples heads to explode.

On edit: I realize that the awesome power of influencing the greatest page shouldn't be abused, but I just can't help myself.

This is the greatest thing since MJ died. The only thing that could make it better is if the admins brought back the nuclear ignore option. That would be better than cornflakes on chicken!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Yes, the announcement has brought a lot of assholes out of their hidey holes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redneck Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. More crazy people than assholes it seems. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. Telling people that they're whining instead of dealing with the issues is rude.
Edited on Fri Jul-10-09 02:53 PM by EFerrari
And not only does it not solve the problem, it just creates bad feeling. But it is easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Yup.
Fun for wankers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
28. I plan on using it liberally...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #28
53. As opposed to using it conservatively? how...consistent of you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
30. Whaddaya mean? It's all I use anymore! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
32. I was thinking last night that it gives us one more way to be negative
when that's already too easy on discussion boards. And this particular way can be completely anonymous.

It's not very important to me but I hope it doesn't result in spitefulness or people getting their feelings hurt needlessly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marketcrazy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. I used it a couple of times yesterday
just for the hell of it, I wont be using it again unless the OP is extremely offensive ( to me ) and maybe not even then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. "Democratic Whores" is on the Greatest... if that's an improvement.....
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #39
52. It's a good thread.
You should try reading it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #35
50. I don't know what I will do. Guess am just waiting to see what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Well said
Edited on Fri Jul-10-09 02:54 PM by omega minimo
I'm using the Weed Out The Detractors feature, to see what the other 140,000 of us have to say. DoublePlusGood :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
38. Why not stop recommending posts as well?
Edited on Fri Jul-10-09 02:57 PM by WI_DEM
People should be able to decide by topic if they want to read a post rather than number of recommendations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marketcrazy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. how can i hide threads with the term "unrec" in them?
anyone??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Use the Hide Thread button
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
44. Nothing scares progressives more than new ideas, voting, and progress.
Oh, if only things were like they were back in the good old days when progressives knew when to keep their mouths shut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
45. Thanks for the laugh! Best parody of the day!!
That Orwellian shit was hilarious!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Thanks for IDing yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Thanks for IDing YOURself!
Edited on Fri Jul-10-09 06:59 PM by TexasObserver
Keep the humor coming!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
48. I must confess to having used it a couple of times yesterday but my goal is never to use it again.
I've never put anyone on ignore whether I agree with them or not, I heard someone mention hiding threads the other day, I don't know how to do that and don't want to know.

I'm out of here for the night.

Peace to you, omega minimo.:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Good on ya
I didn't want to use Ignore but all the belligerent glee in response to the Us vs. Them button was undeniable. There's over 140,000 members here and the mockery by the few who think they know what "nearly everyone" thinks is loony.

You be well, Uncle Joe
:hug: I'm going swimming. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
51. fap fap fap
proceed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC