|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Stuart G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 06:23 PM Original message |
Solution to the unrecommended discussion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. How is the rec/unrec thing being "abused" ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. You want to give the moderators the ability to over ride the function? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stuart G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 06:29 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. No, of course not, Each moderator has the same vote as all members. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 06:49 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. If it isn't a special power, it already exists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
obliviously (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 07:13 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Some times I put a hex on them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 07:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Not a hex!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
obliviously (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 07:22 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I only do that to really bad posts!! N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 08:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
22. Don't they already have the ability to rec? I don't see what the difference would be. Serious here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. who cares about the unrec function |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
5. No solution is needed since this has already been decided by Skinner, the owner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stuart G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 06:48 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Skinner said he would look at all options, this is an option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 07:59 PM Response to Reply #7 |
21. No matter what is done, somebody will not like it, somebody will be pissed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
6. Better solution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stuart G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 06:51 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. I don't plan to use this feature. but some may abuse it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
10. There's no problem, why look for a solution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stuart G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 07:06 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. There is a problem, this will not go away, and I have tried to be honest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 07:15 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Some light reading for you, written by the guy who OWNS this site. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 07:15 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. The problem seems to be the fact that some here want to be the deciders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
11. Neutral already exists - it's called NOT VOTING! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
13. There's no problem to solve. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
19. So, you have a solution for something that isn't a problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostInAnomie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-18-09 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
20. Seems to be working great to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC