Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Early April Quest for the Pulitzer in Terrible Journalism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProgressiveAmPatriot Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 03:06 AM
Original message
The Early April Quest for the Pulitzer in Terrible Journalism
Link to original: http://progressiveamericanpatriot.blogspot.com/2007/04/early-april-quest-for-pulitzer-in.html

The Early April Quest for the Pulitzer in Terrible Journalism
By a progressive American Patriot at the Progressive American Patriot blog

It would seem to me that as a journalist it is important to investigate stories, check the facts and give the public as accurate information as possible. It would seem that journalists would report on substance, rather than http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6n7jAVMLgQw">how a candidate looks in a swimsuit. This, however, is not the press we have come to know. So far, the month of April has been filled with terrible journalism.

This month, rather than investigate a http://www.buzzflash.net/story.php?id=10411">big story on a potential Wal-Mart policy shift that could affect millions of women’s health, the New York Times wrote a http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/05/business/05improve.html?ex=1176696000&en=7452960d08d7b142&ei=5070">fluff piece on the company’s “lessons in self-help.”

It is shame that the big story was on my blog and that the fluff piece was done by the New York Times. If it had been the other way around it might have actually changed people’s lives.

This month, the AP and CNN http://www.buzzflash.net/story.php?id=10342">distorted the nature of the “Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.” Both sources repeated the “Swift Boat Veterans for Truth’s” attacks on John Kerry, without acknowledging that the group was slanderous to say the least.

And last Thursday, Katie Couric and CBS joined the fro of journalists and corporate owned media outlets competing for a Pulitzer in terrible, apathetic and horribly deceptive journalism. As Media Matters http://mediamatters.org/items/200704130003">reported Couric repeated “http://mediamatters.org/items/200701230010">thoroughly http://mediamatters.org/items/200703200011#20070412">debunked” rumors that Obama had gone to a madrassa as a child. She actually had the nerve to ask, “Is America ready to elect a president who grew up praying in a mosque?” If she had read his autobiography, which I recommend, she would have known just how bogus this "question" is.

The New York Times was lazy. The AP and CNN should have known better. Katy Couric should read a book. They all have a lot to learn about good journalism. They could start by ceasing to repeat udder hogwash. They could learn a lesson from NPR and try to crack open another scandal like Attorneygate. I'll leave it to you to choose who wins the Pulitzer in Terrible Journalism.

If you liked this article http://www.buzzflash.net/submit.php?url=http%3A//progressiveamericanpatriot.blogspot.com/2007/04/early-april-quest-for-pulitzer-in.html]">buzz-it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProgressiveAmPatriot Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. shameless kick n/t
Edited on Sat Apr-14-07 12:13 PM by ProgressiveAmPatriot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveAmPatriot Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Truely Shameless kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC